05-08-2012
|
#301 (permalink)
| |
In my experience, I notice that straight women will dress up/be meticulous about their makeup not to attract straight men but to impress their lady friends. I think straight men are the same but about the kind of women we date. We see a standard of beauty that we're not necessarily attracted to personally, but believe that all our friends think is ideal. We'll try and date these women to impress our guy friends. I think this is the main reason guys will go for twiggy girls (nothing wrong with that if that's what you actually like), while if you look at any culture without mass media they almost always value thicker girls.
Personally, I try to keep good, intelligent people as friends, so what impresses them the most is a kind capable woman who treats me well. When I find a woman like that who also has a nice, big butt, then I'm very happy.
| | |
| |
07-02-2012
|
#304 (permalink)
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by aliuel Yeah, I've found that certain positions are logistically harder when there's a lot of belly fat etc. in the way. Don't get me wrong, having a chubby girl with lovely soft curves and boobs big enough to tit fuck is great, but as someone who is not that well endowed I found real BBWs to be just a lot of thrusting in the general area and not always sure whether I was hitting vagina or a fold of fat! | I've never fucked anyone really huge, the largest were both UK size 18 (US 16 I think) and I was about 250 at the time. They were possibly the best fucks I ever had, with both we tended to fuck mostly in missionary where our combined flesh might have robbed me of an inch of cock but by spreading her legs wide, putting my hands on her thighs, kneeling with my knees either side and having my body more vertical I'm sure I could get as deeply into either of them as I could into my skinny ex wife when I was 40 pounds lighter.
Fat squishes out the way, at least to a point :)
| | |
| |
07-05-2012
|
#305 (permalink)
| |
Yepp, 7X6, you accurately pointed out the methods for fucking a BBW. And size 16 / 250 lbs. fits within that category, by the way. Hopefully, your tips will be of value to newbies who've never experienced a heavier woman. May I also add the benefits of doggy-style as well as reverse cowgirl. With some deft movement of skin or creative angling, both of these positions can work equally well as missionary with a modicum of inch loss. They may not seem so from the sound of it, but if you take the time to maneuver a little and "squish" away some tissue, you're golden!
| | |
| |
07-05-2012
|
#307 (permalink)
| |
Yepp, spoon's a harder one to do with BBW's. I've managed to do it too. I think it was a combination of three things: (1) I was then, and am now, very thin so I had no guy of my own cutting down my size; (2) I'm also well-hung at over 7 inches; and (3) to the woman's credit she managed to keep her right leg elevated while I penetrated her in spoon which exposed more of her vagina and made it easier to plunge deeply into her love tunnel.
Not to take any of that credit away from her, but Point (3) was made easier for her because she did not have to keep that leg elevated for long. To give her even more credit, spoon felt so good with her that that was the position I came in. I think it had to do with the fact that I was thinking, "Shit, I'm actually doing this BBW in spoon!" but I got about 10 pumps in, pulled out and came all over her left thigh.
| | |
| |
07-05-2012
|
#308 (permalink)
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JR7 Yepp, 7X6, you accurately pointed out the methods for fucking a BBW. And size 16 / 250 lbs. fits within that category | Niether of the women were 250, I was and am now. The taller (5'9") of the two size 18 women told me what she weighed about 170 which probably means 180 so big but possibly not truly into BBW territory. Or maybe she was for some.
On the subject of my weight, i've been 30 pounds heavier and 40 pounds lighter than I am now and don't think it really has much effect on the size of my cock. At my lightest (210) I was easily 7" along the top with no "bone pressing" at all, at my fattest I could squish away a couple of inches of flab and still read almost 7". Obviously it had a huge impact on my apparent and flacid sizes though.
I've read in many places that for every 30 pounds you lose you gain an inch but I think it's only an apparent inch, I wish it wasn't, a 9" cock would be the inspiration I'd need to get below 200...
| | |
| |
07-05-2012
|
#309 (permalink)
| |
I'm a big guy, and have had my fair share, of big women. From strictly a mechanical perspective. sex with skinnier women is more enjoyable in my experience. They are more flexible, and lighter, so you can be more creative. Fat girl sex is either, them riding you, or doggy style, whereas, with the smaller women, I've been with, I've been able to manhandle them. Pick them up, and pin them to the wall. Spoon from the side, and when they ride it's nicer, because there isn't 185-200lbs of woman, squishing you.
I also, dislike the notion, that fat girls are dirtier, and such. Women of all shapes will suck the life out of your nuts, you just have to find em. I've met plenty of prude chubby chicks, that just wanted to make out.
| | |
| |
07-07-2012
|
#310 (permalink)
| |
chigity, I agree that not all fat chicks are dirty. You raise a good point. But I will say that I've never been with a fat chick who didn't let me go down on her on the first date. Certainly, some wouldn't have sex, but of all the heavy chicks I'd been with if I hooked up with them on the first opportunity I at least went down on every one of them. Very nice perk to making out with fat chicks as far as I'm concerned. Cunnilingus has always been one of my favorite things to do so it was a way of guaranteeing my satisfaction. And yes, though not always, I'd say 4 out of 5 times going down on a fat chick would result in 69.
| | |
| |
07-08-2012
|
#312 (permalink)
| |
It's been awhile since I had sex with a fuller woman, but in retrospect-I really enjoyed it. I could fuck her pretty good, she liked the fast, deep pounding. And I have to say, there is nothing like feeling the lovely softness of her body as mine pressed against hers with every thrust. Still good wank fodder for me today.
| | |
| |
07-08-2012
|
#313 (permalink)
| |
It's funny you mentioned "wank fodder," Ramsey. I've been with some conventionally rather attractive females in my day, but for some reason I have a very limited line-up for masturbation fodder and invariably it is the fat ones who make the list. Sometimes I can remember that the sex wasn't even that stellar, but the passage of time and re-creative ability of the mind allow me to see these past hook-ups in new lights. Like I sometimes weave a fantasy of what could have been had I had another session with them knowing what I learned 5 years after the original hook-up.
| | |
| |
07-08-2012
|
#314 (permalink)
| |
I am a curvier woman and have not had issues with positions like spooning or any other come to think of it. The two that get me off the most are standing with my partner behind me and I am in heels or on tippy toes; the other is from the side. I also like being on top or from behind bending my ass in the air
Are you actually trying to get into other positions or are you just doing what seems easier?
| | |
| |
07-08-2012
|
#315 (permalink)
| |
Well for me I am heavy set guy.
And for the men I have been with. I have never had a problem of getting myself into any position to accommodate the man.
And of the few times I have been with couples (MW). I have always had no problem getting into any position they require for me to be in. And I have been bent and twisted in quite a variety of men and women so they can get off.
What can I say I am very a accommodating person.
| | |
| | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | |
On Cam Now | | awjack87, Big_Teen94, Bounceraut1, ferrari98, furrygirth, hellmouth, imalearnya, J3KYLL, Johnsonnorth, Levva, longfella8, m8ie, naked_butler, nick4fun, Odair, pazek, samman1, selfer79, yourwanker | | |
Online: 2235 | Chatting: 82 |