LPSG

What do you women think about BLACK COCK?

Aahhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeee! Stop fighting, children! Whenever this topic is brought up it always gets ugly! Jayranner, what are you asking exactly? As a woman I can not divorce a man's personal parts from him as a

is part of a discussion in the Women's Issues forum that includes topics on A special place for women (men are welcome to participate too).


Go Back   LPSG > Main > Women's Issues

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2005   #31 (permalink)
naughty is offline


Aahhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Stop fighting, children! Whenever this topic is brought up it always gets ugly! Jayranner, what are you asking exactly? As a woman I can not divorce a man's personal parts from him as a whole. I think that Orca hit the nail on the head, It is the man himself that makes the difference. Having dated men of all three races, this whole thing is ridiculous. There is one constant I have seen... men are from Mars and women are from Venus, period. I am sure you will find curious women of other races due to the stereotypical information out there.

Naughty
naughty is offline  
Old 02-01-2005   #32 (permalink)
shocked is offline


Quote:
Originally posted by madame_zora@Jan 30 2005, 04:13 AM
I think black cocks are darker than white cocks.
:D
shocked is offline  
Old 02-01-2005   #33 (permalink)
jonb is offline


Yeah, now that I look closer, it's female.

Here's a black cock.

And here's two of them. Soon after this picture was shot, one of them killed the other, though. Don't ask why.
jonb is offline  
Old 02-01-2005   #34 (permalink)
Pecker is offline
Retired Moderator


Quote:
Originally posted by jonb@Feb 1 2005, 06:46 PM
Soon after this picture was shot, one of them killed the other, though. Don't ask why.
One of them must have told the other, "I've got a bigger pecker than you do, you cluck!"
Pecker is offline  
Old 02-02-2005   #35 (permalink)
naughty is offline


JOnb,

That was great !

Naughty
naughty is offline  
Old 02-02-2005   #36 (permalink)
D_Humper E Bogart is offline
Banned


I wonder what !Cock Fighting" would mean on this board?
D_Humper E Bogart is offline  
Old 02-02-2005   #37 (permalink)
madame_zora is offline


Hey, if we have an lpsg cock fight, I get to make the outfits!



find music at www.pandora.com
madame_zora is offline  
Old 02-02-2005   #38 (permalink)
lapdog2001 is offline


Quote:
Originally posted by madame_zora@Feb 2 2005, 06:23 AM
Hey, if we have an lpsg cock fight, I get to make the outfits!
Madam Zora making costumes ...
"Let's see, here we have a Large, and here is an Extra Large, another Large, and this one is XXL"...,
...and Madam Zora takes a 'break' to custom fit the XXL!

LapDog :P

LapDog
100% Heterosexual, 7"+ by 6"
lapdog2001 is offline  
Old 02-02-2005   #39 (permalink)
jonb is offline


Quote:
Originally posted by ORCABOMBER@Feb 2 2005, 12:42 AM
I wonder what !Cock Fighting" would mean on this board?
As long as it doesn't involve attaching shivs.
jonb is offline  
Old 02-02-2005   #40 (permalink)
Imported is offline


jayranner1: Sorry, but John Holmes isn't in the same ballpark as Lexington Steele... that this is a baseball bat!

Quote:
Originally posted by thirdlegmeat@Feb 1 2005, 05:57 AM
And if you want to talk about extremes, just remember who the all-time cock King was:

John Holmes :)
Imported is offline  
Old 02-03-2005   #41 (permalink)
thirdlegmeat is offline


Someone recently posted a link to an article where Lexington Steele is talking about his life as a pornstar and his large penis.

Whoever has that could you please post it again, as it relates to this post.

But I'll go ahead and highlight a key point: Lex, himself, said he was "only 10 3/4 inches long." He also acknowledged that people often exaggerate his size, but that he doesn't like doing that because it's dishonest. Now 10 3/4 inches is still HUGE. But John Holmes was documented at over 12"...approaching 13 if I remember correctly.

I know that an edict came from "Naughty" for us to stop acting like children, but I think honest debate is healthy. And besides, I've never been one to avoid speaking the truth for fear of offense. That kind of appeasement never accomplishes anything.

Anyway, the article was recently discussed on LPSG a couple of months ago, and the link was posted. If someone has this, please post it again.

Thanks.
thirdlegmeat is offline  
Old 02-03-2005   #42 (permalink)
blar is offline


Quote:
Originally posted by ORCABOMBER@Feb 2 2005, 08:42 AM
I wonder what !Cock Fighting" would mean on this board?
lol we would need to buy penis sized boxing gloves and duke it out
blar is offline  
Old 02-09-2005   #43 (permalink)
D_Humper E Bogart is offline
Banned


I ain't winning this round. Maybe I'll enter the beauty contest. ;)
D_Humper E Bogart is offline  
Old 02-09-2005   #44 (permalink)
Imported is offline


doubtless_mouse: JayRanner1 - The site you linked to is so full of fallacies and stereotypical information as to be worthless. The Author uses text out of context and uses little tricks to add credibility to his idea. (an example of this is the changing of the text color to match the picture of Darwin, this makes the reader think that the following text is from Darwin when it in fact is not). The author references Natural selection, but only gives the "layman’s" explanation for it. Darwin was very specific in his theory to explain that Natural Selection referred to traits in species and not individuals, yet the author uses the "Survival of the Fittest" line and the "weak took a back seat" implying that individuals did not survive.

Another issue with this site is the authoritiveness of the site. The author very clearly states he is not a doctor, but does not list any qualification to support his theories. The site is not affiliated with any of the references he uses (and one would wonder if he obtained permission to use them). The author insults those that question his theory (calling them Short sighted whiners). The site is too opinionated, lacks any independent support (individual did no research only partial quotes to others who did). The site is clearly an advertisement for Penis Enlargement sponsors and Large Cock Porn sites, and other porn sites.

Just because you stumbled across a site that looks like it a really study on penis size, doesn't mean it has any merit. I am a very accomplished graphic designer, and have been designing web sites for a number of years, likewise I am a fairly decent academic writer (this post should not be taken as an example of my academic writing, this is a quick note before I jaunt off to bed), if I wanted to spend the time I could develop a web site that would seem to completely refute the claims in PenisDebate.com, the site would look professional, the materials would be presented in an appealing and well written manner. The issue though isn't about how well I write or how great the web site looks; the real issue is about the content of the material posted. I would not be able to post material with reliable content because this is not my area of expertise, just like it is not the author’s expertise.

Ramblings from the Mouse
Imported is offline  
Old 02-09-2005   #45 (permalink)
jonb is offline


Yeah, sexual selection is a lot more complicated than that.

It's a strange bit of k00kery. Until I saw that site, I'd devised the k00ks of human evolution into three categories:

*those who think evolution can't happen
*those who believe early hominid society was marked by endemic warfare
*those who think humans are natural vegetarians

But these are people who don't realize that evolution is itslef basically chaos theory.
jonb is offline  

Tags
black, cock, women

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs

On Cam Now
BigIvyGuy, birminghamlad, gooner18, jamesdeann, mackan_, nakedbro, Nycsac3, ronin001

Please read the rules.

Online: 1506 | Chatting: 40

Sponsors

Copyright 1999 - 2014 lpsg.com. All rights reserved