Originally Posted by RawDog
The drawback of being straight is that I don't have any interest at all in seeing other guys' penii. Curious as I am, I just can't bring myself to gawk at them for curiosity's sake.
You quoted my typo!
Benefit of being a straight girl is that I enjoy the galleries and the occasional cam session.
One guy with a longer foreskin (still provides coverage when erect) said that he actually cums faster with a condom because of the way it interacts with his foreskin and demonstrated by masturbating on cam for me. The condom was put on with the foreskin fully retracted. With each forward stroke (up the shaft, toward the head) the condom would move with the skin. The ring moved up and down the shaft indicating how much travel the skin under it had and at the head the condom, vacuum snug to the skin, it would suck inward along with the foreskin as it formed the cowl again with the loose skin forward. The extra stimulation, I'm assuming, is from the presence of condom, two layers of it actually, between the head and inner foreskin where normally there would be nothing as well as whatever sensation is created by having something at the cleft behind the head where the foreskin joins.
It's really hard to describe this. If you took a sock and pushed the toe back into the tube about 2/3s of the way then poked the toe only to point back out of the fold you'd made, that's sort of how it looks. Because the condom is tight to the skin on the cock, as the skin moves the condom moves with it to exactly
the same degree that the foreskin moves.
I reiterate that this isn't well known because it's rare to pull out and examine while in the midst of sex. For entry men often pull the skin back, with a condom it's a given. Pulling out after it's only intelligent to hold of the condom ring at the base to prevent slippage/leakage and it's likely second nature to do the same when changing positions.
If the foreskin still covers the head when erect and is fully retracted before applying the condom then it is still in action during intercourse. Any woman who has taken an uncut cock deeper than just the head, condom or no, cannot state that she's never had foreskin in her. It's a farcical claim.
When I have an erection, the base around my cock somewhat "pooches" out and almost resembles the base of a mountain (albeit a little smaller). More evidence I had a little too much taken off the top? Not sure, but whatever the case, I am happy being cut.
Yes, that's what that would suggest. And I'm glad you're happy with your penis as well you should be. From your descriptions it brings both you and your partners great pleasure. Should cloning become mainstream I might ask for some of your DNA.
How strange. I always thought it was obvious whether or not a guy was cut or uncut. Did his erections look like he was uncut? Futhermore, I'm remembering a discussion I had with one of my wife's friends in a hot tub once. My wife asked her if she'd ever been with an uncut guy and she said she wasn't sure. All the guys she'd ever seen were erect and they all looked similar. So, she somewhat assumes they were all cut.
Yup. His erections looked like was circ'd, but since he had been that's to be expected.
From a little over two years ago..
Originally Posted by Gillette
The second uncirced guy I was with I couldn't tell. I had asked him if he was and he gave only a wolfish smile in answer so when the time came I took a peek. He has larger and erect so the glans were exposed. I asked him why he hadn't just told me he was cut to which he replied a chuckled "shows what you know' as he demonstrated that he did, in fact, have a foreskin. I think I said, "Oh, would you look at that! Neat!" He's still in my top three 13yrs later.
It really depends on foreskin length and growth from flaccid to erect. A shower with a long foreskin will be obvious if he doesn't pull it back, if it's really long you'd still be able to tell from the ruching behind the head. A serious grower with a shorter foreskin you might never know had one until seen flaccid.