LPSG

Father/Son physical?

I remember watching this video where a son and his father were getting a physical and in the end he came onto his son and jacked his son off. I can't find this video anywhere.

is part of a discussion in the Gay Adult Websites forum that includes topics on Discussion and links to websites featuring gay adult content..


Go Back   LPSG > Adult Websites > Gay Adult Websites

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2011   #1 (permalink)
creditkodak1 is offline

Father/Son physical?

I remember watching this video where a son and his father were getting a physical and in the end he came onto his son and jacked his son off. I can't find this video anywhere.
creditkodak1 is offline  
Old 02-17-2011   #2 (permalink)
nudeyorker is offline


You realize it was not a real father and son right? It was actors pretending to be father and son. I think it's on It'sAllGay or Gayforit; a search of Father Son Physical should bring it up.

nudeyorker is offline  
Old 02-17-2011   #3 (permalink)
creditkodak1 is offline


Of course I realize that! If it were real, it'd be disgusting.
creditkodak1 is offline  
Old 02-17-2011   #5 (permalink)
D_Everette Hunglungfish is offline
Banned


I started a thread about this a few weeks ago - links in the relevant bit of my profile.
D_Everette Hunglungfish is offline  
Old 02-17-2011   #6 (permalink)
HellsKitchenmanNYC is offline


Just out of curiosity why is it ok to post this clip of a fake father/son duo in sexual activity but when I posted a link to 2 brothers falling in love (a drama not porn) all hell broke loose?

HellsKitchenmanNYC is offline  
Old 02-17-2011   #7 (permalink)
nudeyorker is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by HellsKitchenmanNYC View Post
Just out of curiosity why is it ok to post this clip of a fake father/son duo in sexual activity but when I posted a link to 2 brothers falling in love (a drama not porn) all hell broke loose?
Because... and I thought I explained it to you at the time.... They were brothers (which was not the issue) But one of them was portrayed as being under 18. Fantasy is OK at LPSG but if it involves a minor than no it's not OK.
You don' let go of things very easily do you? Are we going to have this discussion again in a year and a half?

nudeyorker is offline  
Old 02-17-2011   #8 (permalink)
HellsKitchenmanNYC is offline


Sorry, it's been ages since we discussed it and even longer since my lone viewing of it and I forgot the other bro was supposed to be under 18.

HellsKitchenmanNYC is offline  
Old 04-23-2012   #9 (permalink)
quent19791 is offline


I must be one of the few who found the father/son physical really hot. Most times people have mentioned it, they found it boring. But to me, that's what makes it hot. It happens in "real time", and is very lifelike. The sexual tension is what is arousing, not just the act itself at the end. Are there any other videos like this, where the build-up is really slow and taboo? Also, has anyone seen the guy who played the father in any othe scenes?
quent19791 is offline  
Old 05-04-2012   #10 (permalink)
B_Nicodemous is offline
Banned


Quote:
Originally Posted by nudeyorker View Post
Because... and I thought I explained it to you at the time.... They were brothers (which was not the issue) But one of them was portrayed as being under 18. Fantasy is OK at LPSG but if it involves a minor than no it's not OK.
You don' let go of things very easily do you? Are we going to have this discussion again in a year and a half?
The TOS makes NO distinction in this regard.

as explained by Kotch here

"Incestuous content

By incestuous we mean any content that involves family members in a sexual situation, including such things as 3somes where the related parties have no direct contact. "

It does NOT say "oh but fantasy is A Ok."

nor here

"Inappropriate content involving minors, animals, acts of incest, fecal excrement - by minors we mean those under the age of 18, incest is sexual acts of any kind between relatives, regardless of their age or relation to each other (brother/sister/father/mother and so on).

This rule covers all sections of the board such as threads, chat, social groups, blogs etc.

The fact is there are really great places on the internet for people to talk about their experiences as a minor and of course for minors to discuss their experiences. This is just not one of them.

Members, please report anything you feel is an inappropriate topic regarding this rule."

in fact I COULD paraphrase Pecker and say there are many places on the internet where people can discuss such things. This is not one of them
B_Nicodemous is offline  
Old 05-04-2012   #11 (permalink)
Kotchanski is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicodemous View Post
The TOS makes NO distinction in this regard.

as explained by Kotch here

"Incestuous content

By incestuous we mean any content that involves family members in a sexual situation, including such things as 3somes where the related parties have no direct contact. "

It does NOT say "oh but fantasy is A Ok."

nor here

"Inappropriate content involving minors, animals, acts of incest, fecal excrement - by minors we mean those under the age of 18, incest is sexual acts of any kind between relatives, regardless of their age or relation to each other (brother/sister/father/mother and so on).

This rule covers all sections of the board such as threads, chat, social groups, blogs etc.

The fact is there are really great places on the internet for people to talk about their experiences as a minor and of course for minors to discuss their experiences. This is just not one of them.

Members, please report anything you feel is an inappropriate topic regarding this rule."

in fact I COULD paraphrase Pecker and say there are many places on the internet where people can discuss such things. This is not one of them
This forum, much like the politics forum also has it's very own set of rules, which clearly state "fantasy porn" is not considered against the rules for incest.

http://www.lpsg.org/185339-forum-rules.html

Incest - Be it adults or minors involved is prohibited on this site. Images, videos or websites where two or more related members perform incestuous acts will be removed and subject to moderator discussion which could lead to warnings, temp or perm bans. This rule does not extend to "fantasy porn" where actors are merely depicted as relations but are in fact not. In short, acts of incest are prohibited here, faked acts are not.
Kotchanski is offline  
Old 05-04-2012   #12 (permalink)
B_Nicodemous is offline
Banned


Thank you Kthc for actually pointing that out.

Much appreciated.
B_Nicodemous is offline  
Old 05-04-2012   #13 (permalink)
Kotchanski is offline


Not a problem!
Kotchanski is offline  
Old 01-25-2013   #14 (permalink)
Rob_M_2015 is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by quent19791 View Post
I must be one of the few who found the father/son physical really hot. Most times people have mentioned it, they found it boring. But to me, that's what makes it hot. It happens in "real time", and is very lifelike. The sexual tension is what is arousing, not just the act itself at the end. Are there any other videos like this, where the build-up is really slow and taboo? Also, has anyone seen the guy who played the father in any othe scenes?

I agree, it is a HOT video, a HJ but more like a solid bonding moment at the same time.
Rob_M_2015 is offline  
Old 01-25-2013   #15 (permalink)
slurper_la is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by HellsKitchenmanNYC View Post
Just out of curiosity why is it ok to post this clip of a fake father/son duo in sexual activity but when I posted a link to 2 brothers falling in love (a drama not porn) all hell broke loose?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nudeyorker View Post
Because... and I thought I explained it to you at the time.... They were brothers (which was not the issue) But one of them was portrayed as being under 18. Fantasy is OK at LPSG but if it involves a minor than no it's not OK.
You don' let go of things very easily do you? Are we going to have this discussion again in a year and a half?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kotchanski View Post
This forum, much like the politics forum also has it's very own set of rules, which clearly state "fantasy porn" is not considered against the rules for incest.

http://www.lpsg.org/185339-forum-rules.html

Incest - Be it adults or minors involved is prohibited on this site. Images, videos or websites where two or more related members perform incestuous acts will be removed and subject to moderator discussion which could lead to warnings, temp or perm bans. This rule does not extend to "fantasy porn" where actors are merely depicted as relations but are in fact not. In short, acts of incest are prohibited here, faked acts are not.
Hold on a sec! Recently, "hung4hair" started a thread titled "Twins" in which several of us posted links. My post was removed and I received a warning. The thread was pulled by the MOD team.
The 2 links I posted were to clips from established houses; BelAmi and NiceJocks, both of which make a point of stating their "of legal age" disclaimers.

At the time I accepted fault and apologized but now the aforementioned quotes calls this into question. Clearly the two MOD quotes above are contradictory as NUDEYORKER says "...being brothers was not the issue..."

You may call me Tony

I'm not a porn star, I just play one in the bedroom

Last edited by slurper_la; 01-25-2013 at 09:03 AM..
slurper_la is offline  

Tags
father or son, physical

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Latest Threads
Sorry - Gif ID
8 Minutes Ago by Countr
Party Down South
51 Minutes Ago by bottom
Digital Love Industry
53 Minutes Ago by Fade
100%?
1 Hour Ago by BUSTER

Latest Posts
Sorry - Gif ID
3 Minutes Ago by Countr
just nice tits @@
11 Minutes Ago by riky

Latest Blogs

On Cam Now
bigchris21, dagone, doug_wales, FootballBro25, funguy3, hibernian82, roundmidnight01, SJ_SG, thick1901, TKinSF, trance999

Please read the rules.

Online: 2181 | Chatting: 69

Sponsors

Copyright 1999 - 2014 lpsg.com. All rights reserved