Studs and Players

It has nothing to do with emulation. There is an actual difference between what you think and what you say EVERYONE else thinks.

I will once again point out the mere fact that people disagree with you is evidence that you do not speak for everyone.

That you cannot accept this is analogous to denying 2+2=4. That's why I call you stupid. Until you can get your head around this concept - there isn't a point in having this non-conversation.

(Sigh)

Again...

I NEVER said I speak for everyone.. Ever

Seriously what are you all reading?

All I said is that the MAJORITY of guys I know, including myself think this way, believe it or not, 6 or 7 people on a large penis forum are hardly a majority

& the thing is, its more women who are the ones that I know who think this way

Once you start reading what I actually say, maybe we can have a quality discussion

Are you suggesting that this:

Is some form of definitive proof of what you believe? That it applies to anyone besides the people that you've met? I can tell you it isn't true. I don't believe that stupid crap, and none of my friends do either.

Is that mind boggling for you? That people don't agree with you? And that those people in turn might have more friends that don't as well? You are the only one in this thread making definitive statements about the value of women, and you still don't get why people are bothered by it.

It's because you don't know what you are fucking talking about. I cannot explain why you haven't met anyone outside of your misogynistic circle jerk - but there are plenty of people in this world who do not subscribe to how you value women.

Don't mistake the fact that only 6 people bothered to argue with you as some sort of census on your ideas.

You cant make general statements about a group of people and think they won't have a problem with it. Actually that might be closer to the definition of insanity then anything else. Anyway, you said its more woman, when that is only based on your surroundings and viewpoints you've gained over your lifetime. You've also done the same with men. Your generalizations are the problem and you holding on to them so tightly is whats making you the problem.

Whenever you post or think about people just remember that not all ______ will _____. Its as simple as that.

You've cleaned up what you said by saying the majority of guys you know then said "including myself" which clearly states that you believe in whatever opinion you were talking about. And if that topic was douchey then you will be called a douche. Its as simple as that.

The thing is, I could easily say the same to you, of course people disagree on things. I'm sure not ALL of my friends & people I know think this way, & its pretty safe to assume not ALL of your friends think the way you do

But for the most part I met very few people who don't

& no, its not mind boggling that people disagree with me, its mind boggling that people disagree, & claim their opinion is fact (what you do) & don't even back it up with any kind of evidence to support your theory, but instead result to saying random insults like it makes you feel better about yourself

& my thinking that slutty behavior is unattractive is not sexist

Seriously, how many guys do you know go out of their way to look for trashy women for anything other than sex?

"Wow, look at her, she just blew a guy for a free cranberry vodka, she looks like the type of woman I can take home to meet my mom!"

Doesn't that just sound dumb? Use common sense dude

The type of behavior you are describing isn't stud behavior. It's bro behavior.

See, a stud is what you put out to pasture to impregnate all the mares and the jennys - you need the stud to ensure that the next generation is strong, healthy and productive. In human terms, that is much more complex, because there is a nurturing component to add to this. A human stud is a leader - not just of men, but of communities. They raise children, grow businesses, build schools, create wealth not just for themselves but for those who follow. A dude that can bang tons of "trashy" women but (in your case, let's be honest) repels healthy, intelligent women will not be producing healthy children (assuming you fail at the pregnancy prevention you are surely seeking). You are simply inflicting further damage on women that probably have a whole host of self-defeating behaviors due to a lifetime of poor role models without doing anything to perpetuate healthiness and productivity for yourself or for the next generation.

In short, your attitudes towards women are rather self-defeating in the long term because they are repellent to the types of women you claim would be willing to take home to mama and will only attract women that you wouldn't want as mothers, but bang enough of them and you might make a mother out of one. Look at the data - in 20 years, women will dominate the white collar, high-wage earning workforce. Your ability to relate to them in their terms will become increasingly important - from an economic point of view.

Definitely not a stud. Definitely a bro. From one pragmatic thinker to one who thinks he is - don't fool yourself. Check your ego at the door.

I don't claim my opinion as fact. The only fact I claim is that there isn't a consensus - which is the opposite of your point. You take your view as the one truth, when reality, there are obviously a few perspectives. But once again, don't let common sense convince you, you would've stopped 10 pages ago otherwise.

oh, and p.s. you ARE dumb because you can't reason through 2+2=4, as I pointed out pages ago. Don't think its just because I disagree with you. I can respect the intelligence of people I disagree with, but not when they present themselves to have the same insight as a neanderthal.

Studs, bros and hos. That's all I'm getting out of this thread!

"Hold up BITCH, you don't know me. If I thought they they were hot I would have admitted to it, but I did not say it. So further more you reaching at straws, and I am telling you to back the fuck off. I admitted how I feel about your species, so why not go for the gambit."<------I couldn't stop laughing at this post!

I seldom paid enough attention to know which of my male friends was getting the most women (or which of my female friends was getting the getting the most guys, for that matter).

Still, in my experience, if you want to pick up, be the following things: outgoing, confident, funny, and fairly loud.

As for the rest of the thread... people like what they like. And that's just how it is.

You're sitting on a gold mine, Trebek

I'll be as gentle as I can, because I think some of you are confused and lashing out. Try to read carefully if you want to respond, because I won't respond to anyone who egregiously misunderstands.

I'm not trying to hurt anyone's feelings or be mean when I talk about the lack of "mate value" of promiscuous women.

Girls: you know the "EWW" feeling you get when thinking about hooking up with a wishy-washy, insecure, enfeebled, timid "nice guy"? That's the same EWW feeling guys get when thinking about being in a long term relationship with a very promiscuous woman.

The reason is simply emotional: men are hardwired to avoid the risk of paternity fraud (pouring resources and love into a woman who's likely to cheat and become pregnant with another man's baby-- and then tricking the guy into thinking it's his--over 1 million men in the united states are unwittingly experiencing this right now; condoms don't negate the risk.)

A promiscuous woman is more likely to cheat. Simple as that.

You think you're special enough that she'll stop her sleeping around ways? It's possible (especially as she gets older), but don't count on it.

So men are wired to "love them" in the short term, but eschew them long term. This is the madonna/whore dichotomy--it's purely logical from an evolutionary perspective, and that's where our emotions come from. Logic and reason are ineffectual here--try to convince a woman who's not in love with some nice guy that he's the perfect catch. She can't do it. Her emotions hold her in thrall, just as they hold men in thrall.

Of course, there are exceptions, but there's a difference between exceptions and rules.

I have no hate in my heart, I'm just telling it like it is. Promiscuous women are usually unhappy and emotionally damaged, and the causality runs both ways. It's just sad.

they held each other and kissed
and pushed each other's darkness into the corner
believing in each other's light,
each other's dream



i carry your heart with me (i carry it in my heart)

the same can be said of promiscuous men.
myself and many other women find it incredibly unattractive. moreso than being 'nice'.

Photos (197)

There's something I've noticed that a lot people on this board cannot comprehend:

When someone says, "The majority of people I KNOW..." or "Most of MY experience has been..." etc.

Someone always has to come in and say, "You can't speak for everyone!?!" or "That's not the majority because it's not my experience!!"

Fact of the matter is that they never said it was. They said it was their own personal experience. It's a majority to them. It's a "most of the time" experience to them.

Don't get all up in arms because their truth isn't your truth and vice versa.

PSA: Extremely very few guys in the world are actually 9 inches long or longer. Therefore, if you claim that you or someone you know is that long or longer with no proof, it makes you look stupid.

Countryguy63 is my 50%, but I love him with 100% of my heart!

We are not born straight or gay. We are born bisexual. We just embrace either one side or both sides of our sexuality.

My Gallery & Album Updates Thread

So, what is the definition of "promiscuous?"

That's the question, as that can be extremely vague, and everyone has their own definition or standard.

I'm out of my mind, please leave me a message....

No i think its when people try to pass off their experiences as fact for the whole is when a problem arises.

Not only that but a couple people in this thread said they also agreed with the majority of those around them which meant it went from a "hey thats just what i see" to "hey thats just the way it is". The latter being wrong because of the generalized statements made.

Not only are the generalized statements well general when it comes to women but it is also deeply negative.

And the general tone of this thread has been one of a shut up an take it type. Something i'm sure people's mothers wouldn't feel to good about hearing from someone else.

Another point could be that people are disagreeing because of their experiences and with that i have to ask, whose experiences take priority over someone else's? Is there a rule book somewhere that i'm missing because i don't understand.

exactly.
the people you associate with are not representative of everyone. the culture in your tiny corner of society will not reflect the whole.