LPSG

racism, alive and well

Originally Posted by h0neymustard You know what, I think I'm going to move to Compton. Think that'll be a good idea? Any good job prospects there? WTF is your problem? Can't the mods clearly see

is part of a discussion in the Politics forum that includes topics on Political and government related discussions..


Go Back   LPSG > Main > Politics

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-22-2012   #16 (permalink)
StormfrontFL is online now


Quote:
Originally Posted by h0neymustard View Post
You know what, I think I'm going to move to Compton. Think that'll be a good idea? Any good job prospects there?
WTF is your problem? Can't the mods clearly see what your reason for being on this site is? It is getting to the point that it would be worth getting banned from the site just to be able to tell you what I really think of you.



Justice isn't blind. It sees three colors....Black, White, and green
StormfrontFL is online now  
Old 11-22-2012   #17 (permalink)
sargon20 is offline


The Rush Limbaugh of LPSG deserves the ignore function. The politi-troll is deserving of nothing but silence. It will sail off into irrelevance like the party it trolls for. The last gasp of a dinosaur.

"The world’s a jungle. You want my advice, Anthony? Don't expect happiness. You won’t get it. People let you down…in the end, you die in your own arms."
– Livia Soprano
sargon20 is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #18 (permalink)
blazblue is online now


Heh, already did that a month ago
blazblue is online now  
Old 11-22-2012   #19 (permalink)
Fuzzy_ is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by kayman View Post
Well, I'll await our resident detractors saying "this is an anecdotal incident, but..."
It took a whole six hours. It's getting slower.

.
When in doubt, drunk dance!

The struggle for civil rights starts at the tip of your nose.
Fuzzy_ is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #20 (permalink)
englad is offline


Wow the forums have been having a fair amount of crazy bigots lately.
englad is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #21 (permalink)
Fuzzy_ is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by StormfrontFL View Post
Close but once again you prove yourself a joke. The murders were a crime but even as stated in the link you posted there was no evidence of it being racially motivated. If the perps had been shouting "death to whitey" or " kill the crackers" then you'd have a point.
Thanks for pointing that out. A crime where the perpetrator is white and the victim is black is not a hate crime by itself. It needs to be because they were black (an identifiable minority) to be a hate crime.

Fuzzy wonders if the kind of person who defends racism is the same kind of person who hates President Obama for no obvious reason. Actually, it was "extreme dislike," not "hate," if Fuzzy recalls correctly -- but the hatred wasn't entirely dismissed.

.
When in doubt, drunk dance!

The struggle for civil rights starts at the tip of your nose.
Fuzzy_ is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #22 (permalink)
StormfrontFL is online now


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzy_ View Post
Thanks for pointing that out. A crime where the perpetrator is white and the victim is black is not a hate crime by itself. It needs to be because they were black (an identifiable minority) to be a hate crime.

Fuzzy wonders if the kind of person who defends racism is the same kind of person who hates President Obama for no obvious reason. Actually, it was "extreme dislike," not "hate," if Fuzzy recalls correctly -- but the hatred wasn't entirely dismissed.
How long do you think it will be before someone comes running to HM's defense, and who do you think it will be? Three guesses

This thread reminds of a previous one in which someone like HM tried arguing that hate crimes shouldn't be designated as such. I wonder if HM would consider a random mugging and assault by a black guy on a white guy the same as a klansman going out and targeting a black guy and bashing his skull in? Both are assaults but only one is motivated by an identifiable characteristic. What's so hard to understand?



Justice isn't blind. It sees three colors....Black, White, and green
StormfrontFL is online now  
Old 11-22-2012   #23 (permalink)
Fuzzy_ is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by StormfrontFL View Post
How long do you think it will be before someone comes running to HM's defense, and who do you think it will be? Three guesses
Fuzzy would be shocked that somebody might defend racist acts. Yet this person has done it repeatedly and is clever enough to get away with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StormfrontFL View Post
This thread reminds of a previous one in which someone like HM tried arguing that hate crimes shouldn't be designated as such. I wonder if HM would consider a random mugging and assault by a black guy on a white guy the same as a klansman going out and targeting a black guy and bashing his skull in? Both are assaults but only one is motivated by an identifiable characteristic. What's so hard to understand?
Is it about understanding? It seems to Fuzzy that they don't want to understand so much as advertise their agenda on this free, popular bulletin board.

Fuzzy remembers the thread with poor VinylBoy and the "boy" comments. In that case, the racism was explicit. This new wave of bigots are much more implicit and intentionally vague. Remember, they don't "hate" they "extremely dislike."

Fuzzy put HM on ignore, mostly due to his superfluous Obama bashing. It didn't help much because he's quoted so often.... so now Fuzzy has to still sift through his crap.

.
When in doubt, drunk dance!

The struggle for civil rights starts at the tip of your nose.
Fuzzy_ is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #24 (permalink)
sargon20 is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzy_ View Post
This new wave of bigots are much more implicit and intentionally vague. Remember, they don't "hate" they "extremely dislike."
Methinks this 'new wave' is actually the old wave in a new guise with a new dog whistle at a higher frequency. This 'new wave' is aware what it takes to get banned which is rather eye-brow raising given it's newness to the site and suggests it may have happened before. It parses it's words very cleverly as it dances and does the tango around the T.O.S.

"The world’s a jungle. You want my advice, Anthony? Don't expect happiness. You won’t get it. People let you down…in the end, you die in your own arms."
– Livia Soprano
sargon20 is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #25 (permalink)
h0neymustard is offline


Quote:
When two white newspaper reporters for the Virginian-Pilot were driving through Norfolk, and were set upon and beaten by a mob of young blacks — beaten so badly that they had to take a week off from work — that might sound like news that should have been reported, at least by their own newspaper. But it wasn’t.
Quote:
The same article quoted commentator Michelle Malkin as pointing out, "This case – an attractive white couple murdered by five black thugs – doesn’t fit any political agenda. It’s not a useful crime. Reverse the races and just imagine how the national media would cover the story of a young black couple murdered by five white assailants."[50]
I'm just going to post these quotes again.
h0neymustard is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #26 (permalink)
sargon20 is offline


Did I see a link to a National Review article? That's rather hilarious.

From its founding NR held up the flag of racial segregation and white supremacy, championing racist regimes in the American South (8/24/57) and South Africa (4/23/60; 6/30/64).

A Racist at National Review? Do Tell

"The world’s a jungle. You want my advice, Anthony? Don't expect happiness. You won’t get it. People let you down…in the end, you die in your own arms."
– Livia Soprano
sargon20 is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #27 (permalink)
h0neymustard is offline


Funny I should find this. This goes well with Malkin's quote above:
PJTV - Bill Whittle - The Narrative - Political Correctness - YouTube
h0neymustard is offline  
Old 11-22-2012   #28 (permalink)
StormfrontFL is online now


Quote:
Originally Posted by h0neymustard View Post
Funny I should find this. This goes well with Malkin's quote above:
PJTV - Bill Whittle - The Narrative - Political Correctness - YouTube
Please continue with what you are doing. When you are finally banned it will be clear to everyone just why it happened.

Still waiting on an answer from you as to why you choose to ignore the fact that the media unfairly reports missing persons cases among minority groups and yet cry that they don't plaster the front pages with stories of black on white crimes?
A Woman's False Accusation Pains Many Blacks - NYTimes.com
Missing white woman syndrome - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Also wondering if you were aware of crimes committed by whites who falsely accused blacks? Those cases received national coverage. A white woman killed her 2 kids and blamed a black man. A black woman killed her 2 kids and claimed it was an accident. Both lied but only one chose to blame someone else. Now go on and say that Susan Smith was not more wrong than the other mother. I guess you'll never respond because you'd rather continue spewing your garbage. Michelle Malkin? Ha! She's more of a joke than Sarah Palin but less of one than you

On This Day: White Boston Man Kills Pregnant Wife, Blames Imaginary Black Man
A Woman's False Accusation Pains Many Blacks - NYTimes.com



Justice isn't blind. It sees three colors....Black, White, and green
StormfrontFL is online now  
Old 11-23-2012   #29 (permalink)
AtomicMouse1950 is offline


When is Limbaugh moving out of the country? He promised he'd move if Obama got re-elected.



Quote:
Originally Posted by sargon20 View Post
The Rush Limbaugh of LPSG deserves the ignore function. The politi-troll is deserving of nothing but silence. It will sail off into irrelevance like the party it trolls for. The last gasp of a dinosaur.
AtomicMouse1950 is offline  
Old 11-23-2012   #30 (permalink)
Fuzzy_ is offline


Despite being Asian, Malkin is indoctrinated into American colonialist hegemonic demagoguery. This is reflected in her manic racist discourse on crime.

Michelle Malkin disgusts Fuzzy. She's the worst kind of racist because she increases racial tension by trying to call out racism regarding black-on-white violent crime -- even if there is no proof of racism. It really is that specific: she focuses only on violent crimes because they are the most sensational, and only those that involve white victims with black perpetrators because she wants to re-tell these acts as racially-motivated crimes against the white establishment.

When presenting her conclusion that all black-on-white crimes are racially-motivated, Malkin first parses her sources with the following objectives:

1) Focus only on violent crimes because they are higher profile.
2) Focus only on those violent crimes that are black-on-white.

Malkin has seeminly formalized the following conclusion:

Malkin's Law: If any black person commits a violent crime against a white person, it's because of racial hatred; if any white person commits a violent crime against a black person, it's justifiable defense.

Her inference seems to be the news media and her own values, and her premises are her daily rhetoric regarding crime (both common among rationalists). So far, nothing in Malkins discourse has broken her law, so she gets props for consistency.

Sadly, a certain member of this site is also attempting to portray ALL black-on-white crimes as being racially-motivated attacks. Here is the quote:

Quote:
When two white newspaper reporters for the Virginian-Pilot were driving through Norfolk, and were set upon and beaten by a mob of young blacks — beaten so badly that they had to take a week off from work — that might sound like news that should have been reported, at least by their own newspaper. But it wasn’t.
As any intelligent person can see, there is no evidence that this crime is racially-motivated -- although the person who posted it wants you to believe that it is. The same poster offers a different narrative by Malkin below. Notice that these black offenders are now "black thugs," the white couple is now an "attractive white couple."

Quote:
The same article quoted commentator Michelle Malkin as pointing out, "This case – an attractive white couple murdered by five black thugs – doesn’t fit any political agenda. It’s not a useful crime. Reverse the races and just imagine how the national media would cover the story of a young black couple murdered by five white assailants."[50]
Malkin's spin is interesting but, despite her efforts, she fails to demonstrate any racial motive; it is simply a black-on-white crime. As for the "usefulness of crime," Malkin (an English major) seems to know nothing about sociological functionalism (normalcy, necessity [and perhaps latency] of crime). As a political pundit, she should see that productive discourse on deviant behavior can lead to crime reduction, including black-on-white crime, which is what she's so obsessed about.

When it comes to violent crime, Malkin only focuses on black-on-white victimization. When it comes to racial oppression, her racist attitudes are more broad. Her justification of the Japanese-American internment camps in WWII is a good example. These law-abiding, tax-paying, real citizens were taken from their homes and forced into camps simply due to their race. Malkin argued that the security of the nation superseded the rights of this small minority. Fuzzy argues that there isn't much of a nation to defend if ANY citizen can have their legally-entitled rights stripped for such arbitrary reasons. Restitution was paid and a public apology was given to the interned by the US government, but it was too little, too late. Despite the government's recognition of this atrocity, Malkin still continues to incite and divide... and profit form her bigotry.

Michelle, on the .00001% chance that you're reading this, please educate yourself about the usefulness of crime. Please quite making a bad situation worse by further dividing a nation and salting the wound. Stop profiting off of the pain of others. Please question why you're so vocal about protecting the rights of the white establishment.

.
When in doubt, drunk dance!

The struggle for civil rights starts at the tip of your nose.
Fuzzy_ is offline  

Tags
alive, racism

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Latest Threads
ID this thick cock?
13 Minutes Ago by scarle
male nipple suck/lick
27 Minutes Ago by iwant_
Creaming from Anal
31 Minutes Ago by dubbs9
help find more :)
58 Minutes Ago by cfc188
hello
1 Hour Ago by lollyg

Latest Posts
hey
1 Minute Ago by long_u

Latest Blogs

On Cam Now
amadeus84, bo55, DanP33, thatdude2713, zeone3000

Please read the rules.

Online: 2064 | Chatting: 44

Sponsors

Copyright 1999-2013 LPSG