Quote:
Originally Posted by manlandscaping  We all know it's not possible to "generalize" but in YOUR experience... The "biggest" cocks "seem" to be on men who are: |
great question. In the gay world at least, the biggest cocks seem to be bottoms. Maybe that's just adapting.
About ethnic groups, I do see plenty of guys with african ancestry who are showers not growers, but the biggest dicks I've ever seen were irish. Although the biggest freeballing floppers were arab. The nagging question for a scientific mind like mine, however, is this: did I sample a large enough base? and can the base sample ever be too large?
The irish were originally african, but they lost their pigment over 30,000 years of living in the cold wet forests up north. Lighter skin helps infants absorb vitamin D more quickly if babies tend to be bundled up when the sun comes out. That's why the lighter skinned babies survived more easily in colder climates, giving rise to superstitions about lighter skin color and survivability.
"Race" refers to nothing more than continental family resemblances that developed in periods when humans didn't migrate much. There is nothing real in biology that can be called race. So in fact "race" is nothing but a cosmetic distinction that was designed and used to separate and classify people. In itself, race is not real.
So wondering whether family resemblance is a predictor of other variances in asians, africans, or europeans is at best an indefinite venture. Luckily, statistics are the kind of thing you forget when you come face to face with a real, living, replaceable and very fleshy cock.
But I am curious. Has anyone seen similar questions about which ethnic or continental group tends to sport the biggest tits? Is there any interest in average vs mammoth tit size?
If not, why not? Are huge cocks better than huge tits or cunts?
