LPSG

Are there positions that only work out for you with hung partners?

I have to say that from my point of view there are difficulties with a very large partner, but there are advantages too. Perhaps due to my shape, height, build or whatever, I have often

is part of a discussion in the Women's Issues forum that includes topics on A special place for women (men are welcome to participate too).


Go Back   LPSG > Main > Women's Issues

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-13-2007   #1 (permalink)
zaza is offline

Are there positions that only work out for you with hung partners?

I have to say that from my point of view there are difficulties with a very large partner, but there are advantages too.

Perhaps due to my shape, height, build or whatever, I have often struggled( and with a lot guys given up) with sex standing up, but it works perfectly with my boyfriend.

How about you guys, have you got any "only with the well endowed" positions?
zaza is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #2 (permalink)
Hand_Solo is offline


Reverse cowgirl takes a bit of length I think.
Hand_Solo is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #3 (permalink)
D_Al_K_Celtzah is offline
Account Disabled


Quote:
Originally Posted by bmbm View Post
Reverse cowgirl takes a bit of length I think.
My gf says the exact same thing. In fact, lots of positions where the guy is behind the girl work better with a bit more length because, in that position, it is easier for the penis to come out. However, I believe that my also depend on the shape of the girls vagina.
D_Al_K_Celtzah is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #4 (permalink)
Biggie77 is offline


Not to be crude, but if a lady has a big butt (baby got back) you need a big penis for doggy. One of the pluses of being big.
Biggie77 is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #5 (permalink)
zaza is offline


Interesting replies. I do have a big butt, but have never had a problem with doggie style with anyone i`ve tried it with, and there have been a few.
zaza is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #6 (permalink)
D_Neeson Niceone is offline
Banned


My ex complained her other boyfriends couldn't spoon because they couldn't reach, and the same for her on her stomach and the guy from behind.
D_Neeson Niceone is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #7 (permalink)
Biggie77 is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by zaza View Post
Interesting replies. I do have a big butt, but have never had a problem with doggie style with anyone i`ve tried it with, and there have been a few.
My kind of lady.
Biggie77 is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #8 (permalink)
rawbone8 is offline


I recall a couple of partners being impressed that we could easily switch from missionary position to rear entry without withdrawing or uncoupling, by sliding around and moving her bent leg across my abdomen and rotating. I thought that was something everyone could manage, but these women seemed genuinely surprised, in a good way. I still have no idea if it is common or uncommon for others. It just has always worked, and I'm not extremely long, at 7-3/4" length.

Another position that is fun is female laying on top with her back against my front. The sensitive frenum area (scar in my case) and glans of my cock is pressed straight up (or curved up) towards her G-spot and my hands are free to play with her clit and breasts as well as kiss her shoulder and neck. She can masturbate freely. If the strokes are too long I may slip out, but her hand or my hand is there to guide it back in.

Add a large mirror and it's the best in home porno.

rawbone8 is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #9 (permalink)
psidom is offline


standing up.
reverse cowgirl.
spooning...but that gets too tight for my taste.

Whoever loves becomes humble. Those who love have, so to speak, pawned a part of their narcissism.
Sigmund Freud
psidom is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #10 (permalink)
B_horribleperson is offline
Banned


you need lenght for spooning

beLIEve
10x7
B_horribleperson is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #11 (permalink)
Mackleanen Beebarf is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by rawrs View Post
My ex complained her other boyfriends couldn't spoon because they couldn't reach, and the same for her on her stomach and the guy from behind.
It's funny, but I've seen "her on her stomach and the guy from behind" listed as a deep-penetration position in more than one magazine article, advice forum, or other reference. Some even specifically describe it as a good position for smaller guys. For the life of me, I can't figure out how that can be.

In fact, I also saw it listed in an old Men's Health column as a good position for longer guys who have problems with going too deep precisely because the penetration is limited, which makes sense to me both in theory and practice. It's about the only position in which I can really cut loose and pound away with my wife without fear of poking too far.
Mackleanen Beebarf is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #12 (permalink)
rico 9x6 is offline


I would agree with an earlier post- doggy style always seems to work with me standing/crouching to really control the length going in as well as with the woman on top, which give complete control to the woman on how much she wants inside.

btw- it's such a turn-on when a woman really wants to take it all and will do what she has to do to get it all in!
rico 9x6 is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #13 (permalink)
B_superlarge is offline
Banned


After the first time we had doggy sex, I had a gf comment she didn't realise that we could do that position. I asked her why she thought that, and she didn't respond. I ask her again and she politely stated that she thought a guy had to be of a certain length. I was 5.75 length (4.75 girth) and she had had sex with just two previous guys -and ex husband and an ex bf - who both just so happened to be much longer than me (and somewhat thicker). I hardly ever slipped out though, and that despite her having a biggish round butt. She wasn't but 5'2" tall, but I never reached bottom with her no matter what position we were in. I swear I think she could have talked on the phone and the person on the other end wouldn't have known I was pumping her. I just couldn't seem to have an effect on her during intercourse (I could sometimes a bit during oral). I could even fold her legs behind her head in missionary and pound hard as hell and she looked completely unphased.

Last edited by B_superlarge; 07-13-2007 at 05:00 PM..
B_superlarge is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #14 (permalink)
B_Veronica_Divine is offline
Banned


Sideways scisored works way better with a lengthy guy.

I'm not looking for anything long-term; just something long.
B_Veronica_Divine is offline  
Old 07-13-2007   #15 (permalink)
B_capslock is offline
Banned


Quote:
Originally Posted by superlarge View Post
After the first time we had doggy sex, I had a gf comment she didn't realise that we could do that position. I asked her why she thought that, and she didn't respond. I ask her again and she politely stated that she thought a guy had to be of a certain length. I was 5.75 length (4.75 girth) and she had had sex with just two previous guys -and ex husband and an ex bf - who both just so happened to be much longer than me (and somewhat thicker). I hardly ever slipped out though, and that despite her having a biggish round butt. She wasn't but 5'2" tall, but I never reached bottom with her no matter what position we were in. I swear I think she could have talked on the phone and the person on the other end wouldn't have known I was pumping her. I just couldn't seem to have an effect on her during intercourse (I could sometimes a bit during oral). I could even fold her legs behind her head in missionary and pound hard as hell and she looked completely unphased.

small dick + jewish girl = pointless sex...

(i'm just being silly.....)
B_capslock is offline  

Tags
hung, partners, positions, work

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs

On Cam Now
capetonian, CumForMeFL, dakota1979, Frankdu, hairydaddy123, Handley, hunkster51, largeleo, mackan_, radams3396, shotasaki, st3v3nv3gas, THEPENISGUY, UKMonster, zauber_schwanz

Please read the rules.

Online: 2228 | Chatting: 65

Sponsors

Copyright 1999-2013 LPSG