LPSG

Petite women with extremely well-endowed men.

I am 5'2' and have always seemed to have trouble taking cocks longer than 6 inches. Girth wise I don't have problems at all- once I am aroused and wet enough I could take any

is part of a discussion in the Women's Issues forum that includes topics on A special place for women (men are welcome to participate too).


Go Back   LPSG > Main > Women's Issues

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2010   #61 (permalink)
Pandora77 is offline


I am 5'2' and have always seemed to have trouble taking cocks longer than 6 inches.
Girth wise I don't have problems at all- once I am aroused and wet enough I could take any girth.
I've found that, when I haven't had sex in a while, I tend to tighten up a little, but after a good foreplay (maybe with some toys involved) I am good to go again

A very good friend of mine is about the same height as me but much thinner than me (I am usually around 120 and 130 lbs, but very curvy) and she is totally into really hung black guys. She has 3 kids too, so I am not sure if that is an issue or not, since I don't have any yet.
But I remember a few years ago, we both had a little no strings fun going with this hot Latin guy we both were friends with. We didn't know we both slept with him at the same time, but when we found out I told her I loved his dick and that he almost hurt me the first time we had sex cause he was so thick. And she said: Ah, I dunno, I think he's pretty small......at least compared to the guys I usually have sex with!!
Pandora77 is offline  
Old 02-10-2010   #62 (permalink)
Jedi Gigolo is offline


I'm 6'10" and my japanese gf is 5'2". She complains that her back hurts when I'm done. It doesn't matter what position we do it in or how soft and slow we go.

We figured that I'm poking something up in there and she's feeling transferred pain.

Measured myself when I was younger at 9 1/2 inches long and never really worried about size because the ladies I was with always commented on its size.

I've been with smaller woman though and pounded the hell out of them and no one ever complained about pain before. Then again, they were mostly one night stands.
Jedi Gigolo is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #63 (permalink)
TinyPrincess is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by chrissymgreen View Post
I'm just put off when people think the cervix is the back of the vagina (like the guy who posted "Most of the complaints I have heard are from too long cocks hitting the cervix or ovaries" or others like him). Like the hallmark of a big penis is that it will always hit the cervix.
You nailed it...

Princess by birth, size queen by experience
TinyPrincess is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #64 (permalink)
4herplsr is offline


Interesting how the meaning one gets from a post may actually say more about one's "baggage" than the intended meaning of the poster. If you read back to my original post you can not find any mention of the cervix being in the back of the vagina or that everybody says that big penises hurt them because they hit cervix in the back of the vagina. I passed along the most frequent complaints about painful sex. I find it amusing that the novice directs the expert to Wikepedia as the source of all knowledge. The cartoon drawings don't quite live up to seeing and feeling thousands of vaginas from every conceivable way including surgery, radiography and ultrasonography. Anyone who says they can't see how ovaries could be hit during intercourse is definitely ignorant. All of us are about most things, just nicer to be a little bit more humble. Here's another little bit of information. The cervix is toward the back of the vagina. The top 2/3 of the vagina develop from the pronephrose which is what the uterus (cervix being part of the uterus) and tubes develop from. Sometimes the uterus curves down behind the vagina and this is likely as well to be part of the discomfort of deep penetration. The cervix is not inserted into the vagina somewhere between the orifice and the back of the vagina,.. like halfway? It is back at the far end. When an object pushes past the cervix it is stretching the distensible vagina past the cervix not reaching back to the true posterior which is somehow way farther back than the cervix. Not that this thread has anything to do with any of this blather. Just that your tone was pretentious and pissed the hell out of me.
4herplsr is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #65 (permalink)
B_Hickboy is offline
Banned


Small women are where it's at.

What do want?
A CURE FOR TOURETTE'S!!!
When do we want it?
CUNT!!!
B_Hickboy is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #66 (permalink)
TinyPrincess is offline



Princess by birth, size queen by experience
TinyPrincess is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #67 (permalink)
ManlyBanisters is offline


Quote:
Originally Posted by HickBoy View Post
Small women are where it's at.
Reading your post history you didn't used to think that. Tell me, is there any chance you're slightly biased these days?

I don't need to fight to prove I'm right.
I don't need to be forgiven.
ManlyBanisters is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #68 (permalink)
Enid is offline


Quote:
If you read back to my original post you can not find any mention of the cervix being in the back of the vagina.
Quote:
The cervix is toward the back of the vagina.
So which is it, exactly?

And I'm still not sure how a sex partner could hit one's ovaries. They're inside your abdomen, not inside your vaginal canal.

Quote:
Most of the complaints I have heard are from too long cocks hitting the cervix or ovaries.
Quote:
If you read back to my original post you can not find any mention of the cervix being in the back of the vagina or that everybody says that big penises hurt them because they hit cervix in the back of the vagina.
This appears to be a contradiction.

There are not enough atoms in the universe to create the hard drive space needed to properly store the number of NOPES.

Last edited by Enid; 02-11-2010 at 05:40 PM..
Enid is offline  
Old 02-11-2010   #69 (permalink)
TinyPrincess is offline


Love the reply, Chrissy

Princess by birth, size queen by experience
TinyPrincess is offline  
Old 02-12-2010   #70 (permalink)
B_Hickboy is offline
Banned


Quote:
Originally Posted by ManlyBanisters View Post
Reading your post history you didn't used to think that. Tell me, is there any chance you're slightly biased these days?
No, not slightly.

What do want?
A CURE FOR TOURETTE'S!!!
When do we want it?
CUNT!!!
B_Hickboy is offline  
Old 02-12-2010   #71 (permalink)
D_wibbles is offline
Banned


iv been with women of all sizes i think is just a matter of geting the ladie comfy and wet but as for the cervix bumping happens to me can be pain funn for both if ur gental it can feel good deep slow strokes dont try to break it .

D_wibbles is offline  
Old 02-15-2010   #72 (permalink)
4herplsr is offline


The mark of intelligence is understanding subtle differences. Although not necessarily being at the back or far end of the vagina it is close to the far end as compared to closer to the orifice. The ovary is not in the abdomen. It is in the pelvis. it is intraperitoneal and essentially hangs off the uterus on the utero-ovarian ligament and can be almost anywhere in the pelvis depending on the length of the utero-ovarian ligament. It can be freely mobile or it can be adherent to anything else in the pelvis including bowel, uterus, pelvic sidewall or vagina. And it is at least as sensitive as a testicle and elicits pain when impacted. Thus we are back to the original question about smaller girls and how they handle larger cocks and one can see that the variables are endless.
4herplsr is offline  
Old 02-17-2010   #73 (permalink)
B_curiousme01 is offline
Banned


[QUOTE=Closet Donkey
Are there any women here who would consider themselves to be very petite, and have had, or are in relationships with very well endowed men (9 inches or more in length), and 7 inches or more in girth, and did his size pose a problem for you?

---I have never have but...

Quote: Secondly, would you date a man who was 9"+ in length, and over 7" in girth?[/QUOTE]

I would not choose to "date" a guy based soley on his size and would only date (date to me means seeing someone more than once) him if I liked him very much...however, I am small and do think intercourse could be a very big challenge for both of us. I would feel insecure and worry that he might not fit at all, hence the whole experience could be instantly ruined. Major Mood Killer. He would be unhappy with me and neither of us would have enjoyed it or each other. Terrible thought and one I have had before. :-(

Namaste
B_curiousme01 is offline  
Old 02-17-2010   #74 (permalink)
Libertiny is offline


I'm 5 feet tall and my husband is 8 to 9 inches, depending if we are playing with his prostate.

Our first time together was so bad, I thought I was a lesbian. I was so freak-en tight no one enjoyed it. But the 2nd time was tender and sweet.

I'd bleed, was sore and walked a little slower, but my pussy did adjust to accommodate him.
Libertiny is offline  
Old 02-18-2010   #75 (permalink)
passion_fruit99 is offline


I'm 5'3, 115 pounds and surprise myself at how big a dick I can take. So far I've had no problems with 8" by 7". I find I cum harder with the bigger ones.
passion_fruit99 is offline  

Tags
extremely, men, petite, wellendowed, women

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.lpsg.com/75629-petite-women-with-extremely-well.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Google INTERIA.PL - szukaj: sex petite This thread Refback 03-09-2010 10:22 AM 2


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs

On Cam Now
byron57, HighNTightDallas, malemouse, Mysticalangels, ParkerCute, plusadvies, zero_ga

Please read the rules.

Online: 1688 | Chatting: 42

Sponsors

Copyright 1999-2013 LPSG