This is my first post here, and it is undoubtedly a provocative one. My intention here is not to engage in a debate on circumcision (personally I strongly believe that the removal of sexual tissue from a nonconsenting human, male or female, unless absolutely medically necessary, is fundamentally horrifying).
Rather, I wish to share an observation I have made over the years.
I should also state that I am circumcised.
One of the key points made in support of the idea that genital cutting is harmful is that the removal of erogenous tissue reduces the range and complexity of available sensation.
I now strongly suspect that circumcision, especially the ones which remove the bulk of frenular tissue, reduces the strength of orgasm. There is a speculative theoretical basis for this claim, but also a pretty robust empirical one.
I have noticed that the most powerful ejaculations in porn are produced by a group of men who are largely intact. Peter North is a notable exception, but he is a rare example of a circumcised male who shoots hard. And there are many european stars who shoot with more velocity and volume than him.
I am talking about the sort of cumshots which involve a large number of high powered spurts, where the fluid is literally sprayed due to the high velocity.
The theoretical (and admittedly speculative) basis which may underlie this observation runs something as follows:
In my own experience, orgasm seems to be produced when a system of interconnected nerve endings reach a threshold of stimulation. During the seconds leading up to orgasm, I can feel all the involved nerve endings ramp up their activity until they can no longer be contained. Once threshold is reached, they seem to release all the built up energy in a pattern of activity. This pattern of activity defines the flavour and dynamic of the orgasm, and can vary from session to session. Generally, the energy seems to be released in a series of pulses, and each pulse seems to send signals to the muscles which contract and release ejaculate. The more powerful each pulse, the more powerful each contraction, and the more powerful each spurt.
It would seem to follow that with more nerve endings, one can build up a larger store of energy. Circumcision often removes significant quantities of these neural modulators. Circumcised males often have remnants of this tissue at the ventral region at the scarline (underside of shaft). Intact males have the full array of tissue which extends up to the tip of the glans (head of penis).
Yes, ejaculations differ from person to person - yes edging makes a HUGE difference, yes kegels may help, etc.
all else being equal, it really seems as if intact males have more powerful orgasms.
I have also observed that circumcised males who have been spared the bulk of their frenular tissue are able to shoot almost as hard as intact males (though it is often very hard to ascertain this, since you need a good camera angle to see this).
I trust I am not breaking any forum rules by doing this - here are some examples of some intact cumshots.
free porn hardcore videos starring porn stars Peter North & Eve
Seventeen Video Full length teen porn movies
Pornstar.com :: Free Clips
Uk Road Trips British slut with big tits in outdoor fuckfest!
My Sexy Kittens brunette cutie swallows a thick load
Download Legal Skin #16 from Smash Pictures only at VideosZ.com
Mike in Brazil.com