Quote:
Originally Posted by superlarge but... what senor? I had data directly corresponding to the OP's thread. Isn't it to be considered more accurate than what was posted in the OP? What about those postings? For some reason I'm the bad guy more so than those postings that are completely incorrect with no backing. Just because it's porn everything is a wash? Everything that isn't doctor studied and peer reviewed is meaningless? Have you watched his videos. Smoke and mirrors doesn't apply to his. Their aren't special angles. They shoot the shots from anywhere and everywhere. It even seems as if he uses the same camera crew everytime. His videos in and of themself are shot rather boringly. So what is so inaccurate about how deep they took him??? It is what it is. It isn't just this thread. Correlations found in some other factors that I've posted before have also been negatively reacted to, and they even contained doctor studies, and that's why I have good reason to believe it's the correlation part that was the underlining cause for attacking me in that thread. |
I'm not saying you're inaccurate or don't make a lot of sense.
You're probably right.
It's just that you have to pick your fights.
LPSG is fantasyland to a real degree, superlarge.
'Just because it's porn everything is a wash?'
Well, to a lot of people, yeah.
I get what you're trying to do. It's very well meant. Can't be argued with, really, imo.
But you
haven't got the right audience here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by superlarge If you of all people can't agree with this then there is no hope for me here, not that I'm staying either way. |
You should drop in your facts (and I think they pretty largely
are facts, though no one is always right), and then not get involved in arguments.
Or cool it to some degree at least.
It doesn't serve anyone to argue.
Just gets people's backs up ... even when you're bringing forth very valid stuff.
I repeat: I think you should stay.