Is that in response to me? Because I'm totally not seeing the words "one true king" or even "good ruler" in my post. I was just saying that I found the character interesting and felt that the writers really didn't do him justice. Also, regardless of losing battles he was a great warrior.My argument isn't about whether Stannis would be a good ruler, it is about the claim to be the One True King, as opposed to Renly... One Robert Baratheon does not a dynasty make. He didn't even rule very long.
Daenerys Targaryen has as much right to that claim as Stannis.
A/B
I'm actually a bit confused by the one true king thing myself because what does a royal line mean in a world where the throne can be taken? As far as I'm concerned, it belongs to the person who takes and holds it, though I'm personally disgusted by the idea of kings and queens. I actually liked (show) Renly a lot (not just because Gethin Anthony is cute as fuck) and think he would have made a good king, especially given the options. I was curious as to why Robert gave Storm's End to Renly and sent Stannis to Dragonstone. I read that it was in part because Dragonstone was the ancestral home to the Targaryens and Robert felt Stannis could keep order there. It was also suggested that Renly was given Storm's End because he had a way with people and Robert knew Stannis could never manage the politics involved with all the lords and such like Renly could.Honestly, even if I believed in the following the line business, I think Stannis would have been a pretty bad king, especially with Melisandre influencing him.