In keeping with Fuzzy's previous post of putting modifiers as close to the verb as possible, here's another thing that irks Fuzzy: the placement of only.
Here are Fuzzy's interpretations:
- Only Jane drives her car on the sidewalk.
- Jane drives her only car on the sidewalk.
- Jane drives her car only on the sidewalk.
- Jane only drives her car on the sidewalk.
1 implies that Jane, and nobody else, drives her car on the sidewalk.
2 implies that Jane has no more than one car.
3 implies that Jane drives her car on the the sidewalk and nowhere else.
4 implies that Jane performs no tasks other than driving her car on the sidewalk.
Fuzzy often sees 3 and 4 interchanged, as if the authors don't think that the placement matters, as long as the modifier is close to the verb. But the order does matter.
If Fuzzy were to convey that Jane does more than just drive her car but when she drives her car, she does so on sidewalks and nowhere else, Fuzzy would say: "Jane drives her car only on the sidewalk." However, it seems that many-- if not most-- people prefer to say: "Jane only drives her car on the sidewalk." The problem is that, looking at syntactic structure and scope, only is much broader in the latter proposition -- it is too broad because, as stated above, it suggests that Jane does nothing but drive her car.
Does anyone disagree?
One of my pet grammatical hates is the misuse of the words "less" and "fewer". Broadly speaking, less is correct when the subject is singular or generic - eg: less money, less rain - and fewer is correct when the subject is plural - eg fewer dollars, fewer raindrops.
I hate reading or hearing things like "there are less fans here tonight" or "I wish this recipe included less ingredients".
Let's hear it for the word fewer. It's in danger of extinction!
I was taught that fewer is used for countable nouns, while less is used for uncountable nouns.
I couldn't care less aboot Canuckionics!Merkun talk.
This is exactly right. Certainly, one says, "My present car has had fewer [not "less"] mechanical problems than its predecessor," and "My present car has less [not "fewer"] room in the trunk," but if one is talking about the capacity of the fuel tank, one would say, "It holds less than [not "fewer than"] 15 gallons." Even though gallons are countable, in this instance one is talking about an amount of fuel rather than a number of units.I was taught "less in amount, fewer in number"….
AB, it really wouldn't hurt you to speak like the ruling class. Get with it, dewd.I couldn't care less aboot Canuckionics!
Huh? You told me I sounded like I was drowning.Well.. Unless they are generously speakin' the "International Language", in my bed... ;-)
And I didn't die. It's all fun to you, rite, AB?I like the *gurgling* sounds you make...
And I didn't die. It's all fun to you, rite, AB?
What if you're laying on your side? What if you're being sarcastic? What if you're from Bizarro World?In most places - the nodding of the head i.e. the head moving in an up and down motion, indicates agreement or willingness.
What if you're laying on your side? What if you're being sarcastic? What if you're from Bizarro World?