He cum inside my ass?

[D_Gunther Snotpole]

He also admits to watching lots of gay porn which leads me to believe he is very closeted. Such alleged disgust and dislike usually has curiosity and love at its root.

A familiar and sad syndrome.

Yup, the guy's not just a hater, but a self-hater.
Count me on the pro-buttfucking side.

Done.

 

[D_Bartasiah Candlestick]

Having unprotected anal sex these days is just damned stupid but I guess there are people who are willing to risk their health. Their choice but dont expect anyone to feel sorry for you when you get some social disease. People these days have an "it wont happen to me attitude", all I can say is I hope it doesnt.

 

[technopeasant]

The actual statistics for condoms is 12% per couple year for vaginal sex. It is higher for anal sex. In fact the FDA does not rate condoms for anal sex. That 12% per couple year is simply 100 couples having vaginal sex for 1 year, at the end of that year using a condom consistantly 12% will be pregnant. That is 88% effective. Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Labeling for Male Condoms Made of Natural Rubber Latex

The FDA does not trigger a shutdown of a company manufactoring condoms until the test failure rate = 4 in 1000. That test consists of a water test of two pounds of water for 2 hours. This is the FDA standard. The american manufactorers of condoms use an electrical test that consists of charging the form with an electrical voltage to a water bath around the condom. If the voltage punches through the condom fails. This is also the test for latex medical gloves. The FDA also added an Air burst standard in Apr. of 1994. New Ways to Prevent and Treat AIDS (FDA Consumer Reprint)
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/comp/056.pdf

The FDA apparently has not found a better way to rate condoms and the statistics are supposed to be the same for latex and polyurathane condoms. The rate of failure for spillage of a virus has to be much higher because a virus can get through a much smaller hole than a sperm. That is just a logical deduction on my part. Why would anyone want to have sex with a HIV positive person? I can think of no reason but love.

A report in 2001 reported that there was an 85% rate in decrease of aids in condom users. Does that mean they are 100% safe? That same report states,

However, the review panel concluded that epidemiological evidence is currently insufficient to provide an accurate assessment of the effectiveness of condoms in preventing spread of chlamydial infection, syphilis, chancroid, trichomoniasis, genital herpes and genital human papillomavirus (HPV) However, the review panel concluded that epidemiological evidence is currently insufficient to provide an accurate assessment of the effectiveness of condoms in preventing spread of chlamydial infection, syphilis, chancroid, trichomoniasis, genital herpes and genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.

2001.07.20:Scientific Review Panel Confirms Condoms Are Effective Against HIV/AIDS, But Epidemiological Studies Are Insufficient for Other STDs

Another report in 2006 says

A Workshop on condom effectiveness conducted in 2001 by the FDA, CDC, NIH, and USAID1 concluded that there was “no epidemiologic evidence that condom use reduced the risk
of HPV infection.” This analysis is the largest ever conducted to review the available scientific data on condom effectiveness. While it did find that condoms reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of HIV and gonorrhea (for men only), it also concluded that that “the published epidemiologic data were insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions about the effectiveness of
the latex male condom to reduce the risk of transmission of genital ulcer diseases (genital herpes, syphilis and chancroid).” Additionally, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) found that “condoms are ineffective against HPV.” In a statement to Congress, the NCI stated that “the conclusion that condoms are ineffective against HPV infection is based on the results of several long term studies that have failed to show that barrier contraceptives prevent cervical HPV infection, dysplasia, or cancer.”2
HPV infection is the primary cause of cervical cancer, and there is no cure for HPV infection, which may also cause genital warts, and may be transmitted to children during childbirth. Cervical cancer will kill an estimated 3,700 American women this year.

In the five years it has taken the FDA to comply with this simple law, an estimated 27million Americans have become infected with HPV, over 50,000 women have been diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer, and nearly 20,000 women have died from the disease. Despite these tragic numbers, very few Americans are even aware of HPV or its link to cervical cancer.

http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/04n0556/04n-0556-EC28-Attach-1.pdf

This all sounds like Russian roulette to me, I am not saying don't use condoms, I am saying you better know the person you are fucking well. Personally, I wouldn't bet my life on one.

Please, understand I am not judging anyone I am just saying if you are going to do the behavour just know the real facts. Those are not the word of mouth guesses of anyone on this board. The are the standards of the industry that makes condoms. If you want to gamble know the stakes. If you practice random sex sooner or later you will find someone with HIV or some other potentually fatal disease. If you get it or not deponds on the luck of the draw and how you hedge your bet.

 

[B_AndyA]

More of a response would dignify your shit! You are a moron. End of.

If you want to debate then do it without name calling. Name calling is never nice.

 

[B_AndyA]

AndyA, here's some reading material for you.

http://www.lpsg.org/sex-with-a-large-penis/50174-anal-sex-how-to.html
http://www.lpsg.org/adult-websites/49022-double-anal-porn.html
http://www.lpsg.org/young-and-hung/47399-why-so-much-hating-anal.html

I looked at those posts and there are negative comments about anal. I'm not the only one. This is how I look at it. There are healthy things in life and unhealthy things. We strive to do the healthy things and we want the best for others. We only have one body, so it's best we take care of it. If someone is on coke of course I would tell them to stop because they are ruining their body. Sex is no different. I have a doctor in the family who has many doctor friends and they all say anal is extremely unhealthy. It doesn't mean people aren't still going to do anal or anything else that the medical community determines is unhealthy. It's important to get healthy information out there for people to read and make their own decisions. What I've done is no different than what pro anal people have stated, so I'm not really sure why people are taking offense. After all, we are all adults.

 

[B_AndyA]

Having unprotected anal sex these days is just damned stupid but I guess there are people who are willing to risk their health. Their choice but dont expect anyone to feel sorry for you when you get some social disease. People these days have an "it wont happen to me attitude", all I can say is I hope it doesnt.

I agree with this poster, but if I said that I would be attacked. Nobody attacked him, not that I would want you to.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

If you want to debate then do it without name calling. Name calling is never nice.

I do not want a debate - you are a moron, moron.

(And who said I was nice?!)

 

[B_AndyA]

AndyA seems to be on quite the one-man crusade poo-pooing anal sex and the deviancy known as homosexuality. It's sickening.

Yes, the pun was intentional...shoot me (but not in the ass).

Yes I am poo-pooing anal sex because it is unhealthy. What's so wrong about that? And I don't think homosexuality is deviant. I have many homosexual friends and think the world of them. Not all gay people or straight people are into anal.

 

[B_AndyA]

I was rebutting AndyA's ignorant posts in another thread that dealt with anal sex. When I checked his post history and profile, quite interesting. He's only been here since May, yet he seems set on banning the world of anal sex.

He also admits to watching lots of gay porn which leads me to believe he is very closeted. Such alleged disgust and dislike usually has curiosity and love at its root.

Ignorant posts? So my posts are ignorant but everyone else's are wonderful. And I'm not out to ban the world of anal sex. It would be nice. There'd be a lot less disease. But no, I'm not that powerful, but I thank you for your confindence in me.
Of course I've seen plenty of gay porn. I've also seen plenty of straight porn. I'd never comment on anything that I hadn't seen. A straight watching gay porn does not make one closeted. It's no different than a gay watching straight porn. It doesn't make them straight.

 

[SteveHd]

AndyA, the three threads I singled out all dealt with females taking it up the ass. Apparently you missed that. If you were truly concerned about "unhealthy" anal sex, you wouldn't differentiate between male/female or straight/gay. All groups do it.

Your agenda isn't well disguised.

 

[hyperionic]

Then don't do it. Just because you were dumb and had unprotected sex with someone who you didn't know was HIV+ doesn't mean you need to lecture those of us who know their partners HIV status and are smart enough to know that if someone is positive you need to use protection.

you're quite the sensitive dumbass..

 

[ashlar]

I do not want a debate - you are a moron, moron.

(And who said I was nice?!)

I think I'm in love.

 

[B_AndyA]

AndyA, the three threads I singled out all dealt with females taking it up the ass. Apparently you missed that. If you were truly concerned about "unhealthy" anal sex, you wouldn't differentiate between male/female or straight/gay. All groups do it.

Your agenda isn't well disguised.

It is unhealthy for men or women to be the recipient of anal sex. Do you feel better now? Here's a biology lesson. Women can be penetrated in their vagina or their anus. Men can only be penetrated in their anus. More gay men participate in anal sex than do straight people.

According to the CDC:

The risk for anal cancer is 17 times higher among gay and bisexual men than among heterosexual men. The risk is also higher among men with compromised immune systems, including those with HIV.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

I think I'm in love.

:biggrin1: I'd ruin you...

 

[D_Tintagel_Demondong]

I never understood why gay men continue to think of their ass as a vagina. I've read so much of the ass=mangina propaganda on gay websites and I wish they would just get off that kick. They are influencing far too many young gay men.

There are far more straight men performing anal sex on women than gay men performing it on other men. It's always been that way, and it always will be that way.

Your anti butt-fuck crusade is mostly going to piss off your straight buddies and their 3hole sluts.

 

[Principessa]

It is unhealthy for men or women to be the recipient of anal sex. Do you feel better now? Here's a biology lesson. Women can be penetrated in their vagina or their anus. Men can only be penetrated in their anus. More gay men participate in anal sex than do straight people. Well duh! It's the only orifice other than the mouth available to them. I know men love blowjobs but I would imagine even great blowjobs get boring after a while.

What about the straight men that enjoy anal sex via there woman using a strap on? Theres no semen involved is this okay for you?

According to the CDC:
The risk for anal cancer is 17 times higher among gay and bisexual men than among heterosexual men. Maybe thats because some gay and bisexual men refuse to wear condoms for a variety of reasons. Some just get caught up in the heat of the moment, there's no risk of pregnancy, Sometimes one partner is disease free but the other isn't and lies about their status. (FYI - I think straights do this a lot as well) . The risk is also higher among men with compromised immune systems, including those with HIV.

You always sound like the Anti-Anal Sex Police. I have no idea when or where your nonsense has worked; but thus far no one here seems to be on your side. Why stay where you are so clearly not wanted?

Here's an option. I noticed you have no signature line. Why not add one that says, " I do not approve of men or women having anal sex." Then have a link to whatever site(s) you can find that support your opinion.

 

[Principessa]

There are far more straight men performing anal sex on women than gay men performing it on other men. It's always been that way, and it always will be that way.

Your anti butt-fuck crusade is mostly going to piss off your straight buddies and their 3hole sluts.

Hey! I resemble that remark! :redface:
Hear that straight and bi-guys? I've got three holes, no waiting. :05: :flirt: :05:

 

[D_Tintagel_Demondong]

Sorry to be crude. I get that way when i get angry. I guess that I shouldn't waste my time on idiots like AndyA

 

[Principessa]

Sorry to be crude. I get that way when i get angry. I guess that I shouldn't waste my time on idiots like AndyA

No, you shouldn't; I shouldn't either. But he is such a fun target! You just know if the opportunity ever arose he would be on his back with his feet in the air before you could say butt slut.:biggrin1: :tongue:

 

[SteveHd]

Fun target? Is that why he has hasn't been (re)banned? :biggrin: