How can you tell if someone has a large penis

D_Martin van Burden

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 6, 2002
Posts
3,229
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
258
It only seems that way because, well, you're comparing a dick by a body frame. Think of two men equally well endowed: Guy #1 is as skinny as a rail and Guy #2 is built like a linebacker. They've got the same size, but Guy #1 looks "bigger" because his dick is worn against a smaller body frame.

It's the same rule as a member discussed in a post long ago: that because he's 6'3", his ten-incher seems more appropriately "proportional" than on a guy my height (5'10").
 

benderten2001

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Posts
933
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
258
For me, the "proportional" concept of size has always been an issue. By every statistic available, I qualify as
"well-hung" (I'm 7" soft / 9.25 hard) Yet, at 6'4" tall and
185lbs, I look somewhat "disproportionate" (I think) when I see myself in the mirror. Stupid isn't it? Yet, I feel I would REALLY like to be at least 11 or 12 inches erect (10" soft) to feel like I am "really hung" !! ???
And, yes, I am fully aware of (then) the other problems super-size would bring into my life! Yep...don't say it!
Go figure. :-/
 

benderten2001

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Posts
933
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
258
And, Oh! --By the way...(as a post-script to the above)
I (obviously) am tall, thin, big feet, big hands, and (somewhat of) a prominent nose, too! Think what you want when you see me coming! (It'll be true!) ;D
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
258
Age
40
And, at the same time, a fat guy actually is smaller simply b/c there's so much fat obscuring it. Just thought I should add that.
 
1

13788

Guest
reir: It seems that guys who have a smaller torso/upper body but longer legs seem to have a penis that's more in proportion with their legs than with their upper body. That's been true a fair amount of well endowed guys i've seen... they've been huge and they've had an abdomen and legs that's proportionately much larger than their upper body.
 
1

13788

Guest
hawl: In response to nodd's comment "my very cute friend from FLA,  she tells me, 'If I want to be sure what I'm getting into, I have to check'. Magnums in her purse and does not settle for anything less": what a woman! :p
 

B_RoysToy

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Posts
7,115
Media
0
Likes
291
Points
283
Age
34
Location
memphis, tennessee
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm sure after Adam and Eve and the advent of Cain and Abel, this discussion has ensued. It's all in the genes, guys, period.

But ! ! ! I have wondered if there might be some parallelism between a 'long' face and a long dick. This, only because I have known some guys with both. But, like the long legs and short upper body having a long penis hanging, there are always exceptions. I must be an exception to this because my legs should be 'bout two inches longer to go with my trunk. My shorter legs make my cock look longer, too!
 
1

13788

Guest
rikter8: My experience has been guys with a certain shape of nose.
SOme guys with a little bit larger nose - but slender have big ones.

But...when we formulate exactly how to know - Please let me know.
Im sick of gettin Lil Retired Wranglers :D

- hard up in MI....
 
1

13788

Guest
jackal1: Very interesting topic...I won't get into it but the shoe size thing doesn't apply to me.I'm only 5'5'' and my shoes is a size 7.Now that I think about it my dick is bigger then my damm feet lol!
 

Cobalt Blue

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Posts
2,264
Media
1
Likes
2,097
Points
433
Location
UK
No relationship has ever been found between the dimensions of the penis and any body-part. The differences have a much higher deviation. By that I mean that if you were to compare two men of the same height, and measured let s say, Man A s forearm to be 15 inches from wrist to elbow, it is practically impossible that Man B would have either a wrist to elbow measurement of either 30 inches or indeed 7.5 inches. However, ManA might have an erect penis 3-4 times, or even more - the volume of Man B s organ.
 
1

13788

Guest
bklynbigballs: A co-worker of mine had a theory that it wasn't about big hands, feet or noses so much as it was "disproportionality" in general. If something -- anything -- seemed too big for someone's body, they probably had a big you-know-what too. So that could be a nose or a pair of hands but it could also just be an asymmetry in general -- arms too long, waist too high etc. He said he couldn't exactly say in theory what indicated a guy was hung, but he could always tell by looking at the rest of their body.

The thing is? He was right. We had a gym at our office. He wasn't a member because he was a temp. I was perm so I'd work out with our co-workers. My friend would predict the size of our co-workers and I'd verify. He was usually dead on. Even stuff like thickness and curvature. He always knew.
 
1

13788

Guest
feared: i'm 6'6, 191lbs, i have a long face, small nose, size 16 feet and my hands are, from base of palm to tip of middle finger, about 10 1/2, 11 inches long. as for my measurements? i'd have to say my hands are closest to that (11 1/2in. hard).
 
1

13788

Guest
palladen: The big feet, big nose, big (insert body part here) correlation is bogus. I'm 5'10" and average in (almost) every way ;)
 
1

13788

Guest
raj: There was a famous book written back in the early seventies by Xavier Holland called the "Happy Hooker". She was a former prostitute (high class escort). I can remember ready it (after stealling the book from my fathers night stand) and noting her comment on how she could tell a man had a big one. She said look at the nose. Hand and feet size was very misleading. If anyone knows about guessing a mans size, leave it to a high class prostitute
 
1

13788

Guest
Dantesco: If that were true several of the men on this board would have trunks for noses.