What was that word for forcing/coercing someone to do a sexual act they didn't want to? I swear, I have such a bad memory some times.
If a guy was asking how to get his GF into anal, and someone gave your response (withhold sex) everyone would call him an insensitive prick and say his woman should leave him for a real, understanding man.
And yes, I have tried it. It made me sick to my stomach and I had to poop. It was by no means an erotic experience. If a woman pulled your shit on me, I'd boot her ass out the door.
You def don't want to do this when you have to poop. And you defo want it well-lubed. The first time somebody did it for me they used no lube and my bum was kind of irritated for a couple days.
No, it made me want to poop. Or at least, feel like I had to.
No, it made me want to poop. Or at least, feel like I had to.
Of course I know it's rape; are you saying married people can't be raped? You were saying how she should carry on to get him to perform a sexual act against his will. You don't "playfully" penetrate someone that doesn't want it, regardless of sex or marital status. Threatening to withhold sex unless he complied is coercion. Not knowing whether you were joking or not can be chalked up to the joys of conversing on the internet. You can never tell on a site where piss drinking and butt fucking are regular topics.
I never said every man wouldn't like it. I said it shouldn't be forced on him. Additionally, I mentioned I tried it and didn't like it so you wouldn't reply with something asinine (didn't stop you) like "you've never tried it so STFU."
On the bright side, at least you responded in a well thought out fashion and didn't resort to name calling.
Ok to clairify...I had a private conversation with the op not too long after her post, and she found my suggestion to be quite helpful.
BTW... it was you who set the tone of my response. Rape (or as you inferred) should not of even been mentioned in any response given by you or anyone else. At no point in my response did I ever suggest to the OP forcefully try to penetrate her husband. My intention (which was obviously picked up upon by everyone other than yourself...which led to me referring to you as a dumbass) was to make a sort of erotic game out of it. Think kink. Now had the OP tried my methodology, and had it of caused harm to the relationship, then I would offer up an apoligy and asked for a moderator to remove my post. Seeing as (to my understanding) my method was a success and no harm came to anyone in said situation, there was no need to take such an agressive stance to my post.
Although I did reply to you in a derrogative manner, my point was made, and it got a rise out of you, thus giving me the satisfaction of annoying you!
No hard feelings mate!
EDIT: HAd you of read the OP's post closely, you would have picked up on the use of the word RELUCTANT. At no point in her post did she ever say he was hell bent on not getting his ass fingered, rather one could infer that he was nervous about such an event occuring, and therefore needed some coersion...nay...coaxing in order for the sceniario to play out.
Really? Uhmm, okay . . . then what's that 10% gay for in your profile?
