Latino/ Hispanic dick size???

[Bbucko]

Latino is definitely my flavor of men for many reasons unrelated to dick size, which is irrelevant except in as much as I prefer average/smaller-hung guys.

Probably the main pull is an almost-guarantee of not being circumcised, which is my preference.

But I am also very fond of the culture, music, foods and attitudes commonly associated with Latinos, which is diametrically opposed to my own as a New England Swamp Yankee. Polarities can either be highly complementary or really toxic, and over the years have found both.

The Mexicans I've met seem to be the least attached to their cultural heritage, but I think that living on the East Coast probably has something to do with that. Caribbeans seem the most in-touch with their roots, South Americans fall somewhere in between. Of course this also depends on how long they've lived here and whether or not their families live here as well or not.

I've always strongly disagreed with people (including the US Government) who insist that Latinos are a different race. Racial differences (such as they exist) are genetic, not linguistic. And the only thing Latinos have in common is a common language: Spanish (and of course, Brazilians are the exception with that gorgeous Portuguese they speak).

My mother's second husband was Puerto Rican (Newyorican, actually), and it was a big joke between them that his passport listed him as "Non-white" despite the fact that her skin tone was darker than his.

Racial ambiguity is nothing new in the US, and is actually rather fluid. It wasn't really all that long ago that Italians were considered not-quite-white, although any suggestion of that today would be considered the very height of bigotry. In the 1920s my grandmother was forbidden from marrying a gentleman from Puerto Rico by her stern Yankee father, and when her brother married an Italian woman he was disinherited!

 

[AquaEyes11010]

I'm responding to a couple of things...

First off, there is no genetic basis for applying the term "race" to human beings. Unlike other organisms which are broken down beyond the species level, humans don't have clear boundaries between adjacent populations. Claiming that this is due to "racial admixture" implies that the population in China, for instance, arose there independently from those of Europe, Africa, India and other places, and that these many points spread outward to meet at one point. That's not how it happened. Our ancestors moved out of Africa (one point) and moved out to all other points. As they did so, some physical traits intensified and others diminished along the way.

If you were to look at Africa, there is not one "black race" but many different populations which differ from those farthest away within Africa but are more similar to those more near. Expand on that while leaving Africa and you will see gradual transitions leading to more extreme differences the further away from the African point of origin you travel. And as you go in different directions, you will see different changes, but again, with gradual transition. Also, the number of genes responsible for the physical differences in appearance between someone of northern European descent and someone of central African descent are far fewer than the number of differences in genes within either population. In other words, what makes you different from someone of "another race" is less than what makes you different from an unrelated person of the "same race."

What happens today is that peoples from very separated origins come together in immigrant-based countries, and as a result, differences are magnified. Before world travel on such a massive scale, one would more easily see these gradual transitions from point A to point B, but today, our next-door-neighbor could have ethnic origins that are thousands of miles from those of our own.

Second, and someone beat me to part of this, "Hispanic" doesn't mean "from Hispaniola" but is a term used to describe Spanish-speaking people from South America and some islands in the Caribbean which were under Spanish rule. The word has as its root "Hispania" which was the Latin word for the lands we now call "Spain" (and which the Spanish call "Espania"). The "ic" on the end means they are of Spanish descent but not truly from Spain. It's the same as the term "Germanic" to mean "of German descent but not truly German" is used to describe nations/languages/peoples of neighboring countries. Many "Hispanics" prefer being called "Latino/Latina" or having their country of origin used as their term because being known as a group which is "like, but not really" is somewhat derogatory.

Third, when it comes to penis size statistics, numbers are often fudged. With regards to claiming that black people are larger than southeas Asian people, the real truth lies in the heterogeneosity of the different peoples. Since Africa is where humanity arose, that is the continent with the most genetic diversity. All other populations have lost some due to the founder effect. The further away you go, the more genetic diversity is lost, and southeast Asia is very far away. China, for example, was conquered and genetically swamped by a relatively few populations, and considering its size, has a much more homogeneous population than the same size area of any part of Africa.

As a result, there are fewer extremes in physical dimensions. So it's possible that since Africans are more genetically diverse, there's more of a likelihood of seeing really monster penises (and conversely, really tiny penises) than in a more uniformly "average" Chinese population. And this is where human error, intentional or not, comes to play.

It has been shown that the controversial book "The Bell Curve" author chose to disinclude extremes from his "racial statistics" that would have otherwise narrowed the gaps between averages between "races." In other words, when claiming that, on average, Africans had larger penises, he chose to not count Africans with, what he considered, "abnormally small penises", and at the other end, not count southeast Asians with "abnormally large penises." So he used the numbers which would back up his own claims.

We tend to ignore that which contradicts our preconceived notions and highlight those which support them. A similar instance occurs with many psychics giving "cold readings." Many people forget the "misses" and remember the "hits" when a psychic picks someone out of the audience and tells him his future, or something about a loved one who passed away. When debunkers actually tally the hits and misses on paper, it becomes astonishing how many wrong things are actually said but forgotten by the audience because of side-tracking and expanding on hits (i.e. reasking the "hit" questions in a different way).

So, there ya go.

 

[jimmyboi]

Why is this topic getting off-topic???

Hispanic/ Latino is used in the United State for ppl with Latin/ Central- American ancestry from a Spanish speaking country.



Lets get back on topic

My point was weather penis size has to do with race or not...why ppl always say Blacks then whites then asians..WHY DO THEY NEVER MENTION LATINOS??

 

[AquaEyes11010]

Why is this topic getting off-topic???

Hispanic/ Latino is used in the United State for ppl with Latin/ Central- American ancestry from a Spanish speaking country.



Lets get back on topic

My point was weather penis size has to do with race or not...why ppl always say Blacks then whites then asians..WHY DO THEY NEVER MENTION LATINOS??

Because people are ascribing to the outdated belief that there are "three pure races" and that everything else is some mixture. Since what people call Latino/Hispanic isn't really perceived to be a uniform population, they'll dismiss it by saying "well, if they look more black, they're hung...if they look more white, they're in the middle, and if they look more native [meaning sorta Asian, since the native population arose from Asian migration over the Bering land bridge], they're small." My point was that the topic of "penis size relating to race" was a moot point, (since there are no races), as is our perception that some peoples are always big or small.

 

[jimmyboi]

Because people are ascribing to the outdated belief that there are "three pure races" and that everything else is some mixture. Since what people call Latino/Hispanic isn't really perceived to be a uniform population, they'll dismiss it by saying "well, if they look more black, they're hung...if they look more white, they're in the middle, and if they look more native [meaning sorta Asian, since the native population arose from Asian migration over the Bering land bridge], they're small." My point was that the topic of "penis size relating to race" was a moot point, (since there are no races), as is our perception that some peoples are always big or small.

Ight u make sense...Ramon form bangros..cuban kinda black..so eya makes sense..

 

[dreamer20]

Why is this topic getting off-topic???

Hispanic/ Latino is used in the United State for ppl with Latin/ Central- American ancestry from a Spanish speaking country.



Lets get back on topic

My point was weather penis size has to do with race or not...why ppl always say Blacks then whites then asians..WHY DO THEY NEVER MENTION LATINOS??

The term latino does not define that person's racial origins i.e. "latino" is not a race.

 

[AquaEyes11010]

Ight u make sense...Ramon form bangros..cuban kinda black..so eya makes sense..

Well, here's a wrench in your theory: I am a gay man, and I have a gay porn with Brazilian men in it, and they're all different shades and with different features showing different degrees of European, Native or African descent. The smallest penis in the picture (probably about five inches, on one of the bottoms <surprise>) belongs to a very dark and very African-looking man. The two largest penises belong to one guy who has dark blond hair and very pale skin, and the other is kinda tan-olive with curly brown hair (but not as tight as someone who is of mostly African descent). I highly doubt the casting was done this way purposely. Mostly, I'm sure, they just looked for "hot guys from Brazil."
;-)

 

[jimmyboi]

The term latino does not define that person's racial origins i.e. "latino" is not a race.

TRUE but MEXCIANS dont consider themselves `white&#180; and they are NOT BLACK...

LA...mexicans hate whites...mexcians hates black..

anyway this is way oftopic..

whats the stereotype for mexicans..heard they are small..makes sense to the earlier post from aqua eyes, cause they look more native

and maybe u can post a screen pix of that gay movie scene..

 

[agnslz]

Why is this topic getting off-topic???

Hispanic/ Latino is used in the United State for ppl with Latin/ Central- American ancestry from a Spanish speaking country.

Because this is LPSG where threads are constantly veering off-topic.

TRUE but MEXCIANS dont consider themselves `white´ and they are NOT BLACK...

LA...mexicans hate whites...mexcians hates black..

anyway this is way oftopic..

whats the stereotype for mexicans..heard they are small..makes sense to the earlier post from aqua eyes, cause they look more native

and maybe u can post a screen pix of that gay movie scene..

As I said earlier, I am Mexican and Mexicans have the tiniest dicks imaginable.

 

[D_Roland_D_Hay]

Wow, as a latino/hispanic person, all I can say is that the latino/hispanic dicks that I have seen range from small to very large...just like other cultures. There are of course general stereotypes, but I haven't found them all to be true, hence stereotypes...there is no magic equation when it comes to dick size. We would like to believe that there is, however, it isn't there. With that said, some of the biggest dicks that I have ever seen have belonged to latinos (just a bias here...hah).

 

[AquaEyes11010]

Wow, as a latino/hispanic person, all I can say is that the latino/hispanic dicks that I have seen range from small to very large...just like other cultures. There are of course general stereotypes, but I haven't found them all to be true, hence stereotypes...there is no magic equation when it comes to dick size. We would like to believe that there is, however, it isn't there. With that said, some of the biggest dicks that I have ever seen have belonged to latinos (just a bias here...hah).

Ah, but if you prefer latino men, wouldn't that mean that your sample size is greater for that population? If, just to play with numbers, 1% of all penises are 9" or more, and you have many more latino partners than any other group, wouldn't that increase your odds of encountering the elusive? Sort of like if I had color-coded pairs of dice. The odds of getting a total of 2 on a roll are small. If I have ten pairs of dice, there's an equally probability of each pair of dice rolling a total of 2, but if I said eight of my pairs were blue and two were green, then I could say that I got more rolls with a total of two from blue dice, simply because there were more of them.
;-)

 

[dreamer20]

TRUE but MEXCIANS dont consider themselves `white&#180; and they are NOT BLACK...

Sorry to disappoint you but there are blacks in Mexico:

[SIZE=+2]A[/SIZE][FONT=Times New Roman,Arial Rounded MT Bold]fro-Mexican.[/FONT] By 1650, more than 150,000 blacks and mulattoes lived in Mexico, a figure that actually surpassed Spanish immigration. In fact, blacks outnumbered Spaniards in Mexico until after 1810. The Afro-Mexican presence is not widely known. Yet Blacks in Mexico have a long history here, and in both the east coast, (Veracruz) and the west Coast (Costa Chica) there are thriving communities. In Bobby Vaughn's Black Mexico, we explore the Costa Chica.


With Roberto Rodriguez and Patrisia Gonzales' "African Roots Stretch Deep into Mexico", we explore the still thriving African legacy in Mexico, where Mexicans play African "hand pianos" and perform "the dance of the black people." Mexican "corridos" -- or song-stories -- tell of slave uprisings. And the marimbas of Mexico, as well as those of Central America and Ecuador, all have their origins in Africa.






ETHNIC DIVERSITY IN MEXICO - In Mexico Connect - The Site and the Magazine

 

[Trigon]

TRUE but MEXCIANS dont consider themselves `white&#180; and they are NOT BLACK...

LA...mexicans hate whites...mexcians hates black...

To be fair Mexicans take disrespect very deeply, very personally and are slow to forgive. There's common everyday shit other people are blowing off that some Mexicans just can't let go and we'll be hating you for 'til the day you die--never forgive you. I think there are other groups--black, white Americans--who are very cavalier about how they interact with people, and they don't understand this, so we get a reputation for hating everybody. We don't- not true.

But some American blacks saying we're pushing them out of the cities, so some are shitty to us. There whites who are looking down on us, so what are we supposed to do? :biggrin1::tongue::smirk:?

Now ask some white girls from the suburbs and from the university what a Mexican's packing..if you really want to know. If we're so small why do they keep coming?! Do the math here, people.

 

[eyknough]

My dick, however, is particularly suckable (only joking!)

I'll second that! (That you're suckable, not that you're joking lol) :saevil:

 

[B_andyo]

I would say biggest as in average of countries that speak spanish would be Cuba, and Dominican Republic, maybe Costa Rica too..

 

[Northland]

All you hear is that Blacks are suposedly the biggest, Asian the smallest and white u got either a big one or small one..

What about the Latinos/ Hispanics? I know Hispanic aint a race, cuz u got white-hispanics (ricky martin) and black hispanics (C. Milian).

But to a certain extend most Hispanics are Mixed with Spanish, Amerindian and African blood. Admixture depends varies per etnicity.

I heard mexicans are smalll (typical mexicans are mestizo, half spanish/ indian anmd look like George Lopez). Then I hear Puerto Ricans are similar to whites (their admixture is pre-dominatly spanish, with minor taino and african blood). Also Cubans are said to be big, this makes sense since most cubans are mulatto which means they have spanish and african blood.

So my question where do they rank? Are they bigger than blacks? Smaller than whites?

The biggest in length and girth was a Costa Rican man named Jorge, the smallest was a man of African heritage (raised in Europe and the U.S. his parents were both born in an African nation), the Dominicans I encountered were similar to me (I am 5.8 in length). I have encountered large and small and average sized Mexicans and the same is true of Caucasian men. Size and nationality/ethnicity do not necessarily go hand in hand.

 

[Mr. Snakey]

Buscar Pinga.

 

[gatocangri]

puerto rican here

 

[SereneBlue]

I suspect the answer is similar to the one biologists and geneticists give about assorted animal and human populations - that within group variations will be more widespread than the average for that group vis-a-vis other groups.

 

[Blanquito]

<---- Puerto Rican/Caucasian and tired of all this "racial cock profiling" that is de rigeur on this site. That is why I rarely post. Come on people. Also, the reports on circumscision... while it is true that the majority of males here on the island are not circumscised, the "majority" may be around 65-70% in my estimation. It is even lower with males of Puerto Rican/Latino heritage born in the states. I would only put that at 50%. Anyone else on the island (or in general for that matter) that wants to communicate via private message with me is welcome, but I won't be responding to anyone that posts on rumor or stereotypical myths that have been perpetuated throughout the generations. Enough is enough.