Playgirl penis size survey

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by D_Cunningham Cumshipper, Oct 9, 2007.

  1. D_Cunningham Cumshipper

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've never heard of this survey before, but I found this online:
    "The most authoritative data on cock size was recently published in the March 2003 issue of Playgirl. Only one in every 100 men has a penis that is eight inches or larger. More elusive is the thick one - six inches around or more make up approximately one out of every 1000 of the schlong-sporting guys."

    I was just wondering if anybody had more data from this study to share as I have never seen it.
     
  2. bigbull29

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,666
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    51
    Gender:
    Male

    Perhaps I should be in Playgirl. I'd put all those playgirl boys to shame.:biggrin1:
     
  3. D_Mansworthy Meatwrench III

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0
    Great! Makes me happy at............8X6, that's for damn sure.

    I never believe that shit, surveys tend to be done in a very minor population cut, and applied to a large population, only to find out that indeed, not everyone eats Reese's Cups as previously believed by the last survey..........
     
  4. bigbull29

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,666
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    51
    Gender:
    Male
    The vast majority of men, including male porn stars, greatly exaggerate the size of their peters. We all should know that by now.

    Real Length Conversion Chart (relatively accurate:tongue:)

    8 inches length = 6 inches length
    9 inches length = 7 inches length
    10 inches length = 8 inches length (quite uncommon)

    Girth figures are rarely given because so few dudes have big girth (anything over 6.5 inches)

    Big length is still a lot more common than big girth

    Any girth truly over 7 inches is a rare commodity.
     
  5. vpasqual

    vpasqual New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    NY METRO AREA
    Not me! I am an exact 8X6 and can provide more picture proof if wanted.
     
  6. gcbenji0

    gcbenji0 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    452
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    rare, yes; i wouldn't call it a commodity.
    and yeah dudes lie alot about it, but i'm really 8 on (a good day)
     
  7. patrick222

    patrick222 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Virginia
    I like the conversion factors> television adds 10 pounds ; the internet adds 2 inches. Then add the following marriage conversion factors : 3 inches plus 7 MILLION dollars equals a 10 , 4 inches plus 6 MILLION dollars equal a 10 and so on
     
  8. bigbull29

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,666
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    51
    Gender:
    Male

    Here, a commodity = benefit, avantage

    It's a rare advantage...
     
  9. nudeyorker

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    42,925
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    NYC/Honolulu
    I'd like to know where they buy their rulers or measuring tapes, because going by the stats they give their centerfold, I'd be 10"
     
  10. bigbull29

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    4,666
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    51
    Gender:
    Male

    Going by the Playgirl measuring stick, I'd have an 11" inches and 12" length.:biggrin1:

    I think we need to redefine what it is to be hung. If most of these porn studs and Playgirl models are hung, I don't know what I am. :rolleyes:
     
  11. B_andyo

    B_andyo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Miami
    let call them donkeys.. :)porn =6.5-7.5 inches.
     
  12. sarahkuving

    sarahkuving New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    lowell, IN
    i've seen one that was 10.5
     
  13. LoneWolf10

    LoneWolf10 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    LA
    I'm on LPSG now ATTEMPTING to research cock size. Same problems as before:

    1) The "information" is scattered everywhere, almost impossible to find;
    2) There is almost no reliable information; and
    3) There is too much useless fucking bullshit about NOTHING.

    In this thread, about the dead Playgirl magazine (which has zero credibility in science) there is some "information" about a cock size study. BUT THE MOTHERFUCKER WHO POSTED IT HAS NOT READ IT!

    Nobody else who posted in this thread has read it.

    LPSG is fucking bullshit! It exhausted itself years ago and is just a social site where shit heads waste their time--because it's a BAD HABIT for them.

    I have a "Guide to Celebrity Monster Cocks" on the internet (it will also be included in one of my books) that makes LPSG look like a silly joke. It's the only such guide in the world, and I'm proud that I did it, but feel shame for humanity that I had to do it.

    Currently I'm working on a "Guide to Male Pornographic Actors" and LPSG is a fucking waste of time for this very experienced first-rate researcher. LPSG is shit!

    Get me out of here! Get this fucking useless website off the internet!
     
    #13 LoneWolf10, Feb 4, 2009
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2009
  14. D_Gunther Snotpole

    D_Gunther Snotpole Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    14,613
    Likes Received:
    3
    Huh???
     
  15. ZOS23xy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,073
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    directly above the center of the earth
    Rubi, can we all type "troll"?

    Or "useless contact"?

    I know we can.
     
  16. D_Maureen Biologist

    D_Maureen Biologist Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2008
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    hmmm- Lone Wolf 10...what a insightful rant.... I would say your moniker is appropriate.

    Such anger because this site is not providing you with what you "need" is very telling - in and of itself.

    Perhaps you need a break from your "research" as it seems to be warping your "little" mind....(could it be 'penis envy' rearing it's ugly head???)

    Chill - take a day off, go F*ck yourself - whatever it takes, but don't blame this site for your 'short-cummings'.... (wink)
     
  17. _avg_

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,706
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1
    zing!
     
  18. EL_Duderino

    EL_Duderino New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    lol, what a whiny punk. he doesn't have what he wants so he write a rant about how this site sucks cause he was not waited on hand and foot to be provided the information he wants for his "research".
     
  19. B_625girth

    B_625girth New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,373
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    midwest
    gee, let's dig up a year old thread and go on a rant.

    from the OP, I didn't know that having a thick girth, over 6", was 1 in a 1000 for "schlong-sporting guys." are there non "schlong-sporting guys."????

    i'm 7.25 x 6.25. if I was .75 longer I would be 1 out of 100 to go with my 1 out of 1000 for my over 6" girth. for sometime I have not put too much faith in any surveys or measurements.
     
  20. Beachbumm

    Beachbumm New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    22
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    travel all over the US
    I am relatively new here but i would still like to Welcome You to LPSG forum.
    The fact that you are doing research on this subject is amazing and I am sure that you will be able to help enlighten those that are around you.
    YES, there isnt much information here in this thread as you say
    However.... it was/is well over a year since the last post had been posted.
    Not only that, but as why are you looking for a study that has "zero credibility in science"

    If you are researching these things wouldn't you try to inform people about such subjects instead of wielding strong verbal lashings with vulgar language?

    I am sorry that you feel that "LPSG is bullshit" and "exhausted itself years ago"

    Congrats on your book, but why would you feel shame on something that you did on your own free will?

    If you are a "experienced first-rate researcher" and you use this type language....
    what do all the non experienced 23-rate researchers have to do to get to your level?

    I am currently a 50th-rate researcher and would like to crawl my way up through the ranks. Thank you for any information/experience or tips that you may be able to pass my way