No intelligent person makes categorical judgements of entire populations based solely on their own opinions and prejudices. It's idiotic.
With respect to the OP: who cares?.
until the day when willy or harry flop it out and let everyone have a look, we will never know! :tongue:
No intelligent person makes categorical judgements of entire populations based solely on their own opinions and prejudices. It's idiotic.
With respect to the OP: who cares?.
There are disputed studies that suggest it reduces the chance of female-to-male sexual transmission. Big deal.I thought I'd read that it is believed that circumcision reduces the chances of HIV transmission in Africa. ...
For adults deciding for themselves, maybe. If a guy wants to whack off his foreskin based on those disputed studies, fine, that's his stupid decision. It doesn't apply to infants, however.That sounds like a pretty compelling medical reason to err on the side of caution and have it done. Besides its generally more hygienic.
That's fine, but in the next sentence ...In my personal judgment, a circumcised penis is much more aesthetically pleasing in appearance, at least in its flaccid state.
You're saying you'd impose you aesthetic preference upon them and to Hell with their right to body integrity? I hope you don't have male children.If I had little boys, I wouldn't listen to the "poor little boys, they lost their foreskin", crowd; I'd say "tough shit".
For anyone who's cut there isn't much choice other than to "get over it". What me and others who don't like it can do is: help prevent it from being done to tomorrows men.I think guys who are "mourning" the loss of their foreskin should get over it. They can still get plenty of pleasure from their cocks.
Are you a wannabe Sociologist? Here's some behavioral data for you: intact men usually retract their foreskins when they pee. Flow from said penises is similar to cut penises. You're research is flawed.On a side note, I finally figured out several years ago why some guys use the public restroom stall to piss rather than the latrine. Its so they can clean their uncircumcised cocks after they've pissed. This because I noticed guys using toilet tissue after a stand-up leak.
In my personal judgment, a circumcised penis is much more aesthetically pleasing in appearance, at least in its flaccid state.
If I had little boys, I wouldn't listen to the "poor little boys, they lost their foreskin", crowd; I'd say "tough shit".
I think guys who are "mourning" the loss of their foreskin should get over it. They can still get plenty of pleasure from their cocks.
On a side note, I finally figured out several years ago why some guys use the public restroom stall to piss rather than the latrine. Its so they can clean their uncircumcised cocks after they've pissed. This because I noticed guys using toilet tissue after a stand-up leak.
I thought I'd read that it is believed that circumcision reduces the chances of HIV transmission in Africa. That sounds like a pretty compelling medical reason to err on the side of caution and have it done. Besides its generally more hygienic.
In my personal judgment, a circumcised penis is much more aesthetically pleasing in appearance, at least in its flaccid state.
If I had little boys, I wouldn't listen to the "poor little boys, they lost their foreskin", crowd; I'd say "tough shit".
I think guys who are "mourning" the loss of their foreskin should get over it. They can still get plenty of pleasure from their cocks.
On a side note, I finally figured out several years ago why some guys use the public restroom stall to piss rather than the latrine. Its so they can clean their uncircumcised cocks after they've pissed. This because I noticed guys using toilet tissue after a stand-up leak.
Under present law in USA and other countries, cosmetic alterations are permitted via parental consent. That doesn't mean they should be done.Our parents make a lot of decisions for us when we're young. ...
Our parents make a lot of decisions for us when we're young. This is no different than choosing a particular school or having a child baptized in a particular church, etc, etc.
I thought I'd read that it is believed that circumcision reduces the chances of HIV transmission in Africa. That sounds like a pretty compelling medical reason to err on the side of caution and have it done. Besides its generally more hygienic.
In my personal judgment, a circumcised penis is much more aesthetically pleasing in appearance, at least in its flaccid state.
If I had little boys, I wouldn't listen to the "poor little boys, they lost their foreskin", crowd; I'd say "tough shit".
I think guys who are "mourning" the loss of their foreskin should get over it. They can still get plenty of pleasure from their cocks.
On a side note, I finally figured out several years ago why some guys use the public restroom stall to piss rather than the latrine. Its so they can clean their uncircumcised cocks after they've pissed. This because I noticed guys using toilet tissue after a stand-up leak.
No parent should have the right to make a decision about lopping off part of their child's dick, it should only be done in the rare cases it needs to be done for medical reasons, otherwise it's a decision only an informed adult has the right to make for himself.
Just out of curiousity, how do you feel about parents having infant's ears pierced?
Hmmm, body modification in your mind is the same as social modification? I don't get it.
It's now illegal to circumcise girls so there is obviously a double standard at play. Care to explain why?
I think it's silly and often done out of the parents own vanity.Just out of curiousity, how do you feel about parents having infant's ears pierced?
If circumcision is such a fantastic way to reduce HIV answer me this... Why does the USA (who circumcises) have the highest HIV rates of any developed country in the world?
quote] IMHO, this is because our public and parochial schools teach abstinence as the best way to avoid STD's and pregnancy.
You relish the fact that you've never met someone who is circumcised?!? Hmmm, either you are in the UK or perhaps just anti-semite...What the hell has ear piercing got to do with it? Ear piercing is hardly a surgical procedure and I don't see a newborn child being strapped down to have his ears pierced Actually the parent, usually the mom sits with the child in her lap holding her stationary.
Anyhoo. I dont even see why I am getting involved. I've never met someone who is circumcised and It is rare I ever will, So i'll relish in that fact :biggrin1:
You relish the fact that you've never met someone who is circumcised?!? Hmmm, either you are in the UK or perhaps just anti-semite...