Saying No To A Big Cock.

ignatius4446z

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Posts
408
Media
14
Likes
243
Points
78
Location
In the dreams of a mischievous demon
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I am a scientist and... no, this has no bearing in reality. Sorry, dude.

Woman with the deepest, widest, most accommodating vagina that I ever met was 4'11", half-Chinese half-Japanese, round face, large eyes, very small breasts, very small nose, teensy butt... I could go on, but you get the idea. She did kegals quite a bit and had the most amazing control of the muscles of her vaginal wall. Sufficed to say, she and I were very compatible.

Firstly, it's hardly scientific to deny the possibility of a correlation between physical characteristics without citing any experimental or theoretical support for your claim.

Secondly, it's hardly scientific to then attempt to validate your claim with a single instance anecdotal tale, which is similar to saying "I don't believe cigarettes are harmful because my grandad smoked 80 a day and he lived to be 96".

Scientist. Lol
 

Guy-jin

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
3,836
Media
3
Likes
1,368
Points
333
Location
San Jose (California, United States)
Sexuality
Asexual
Gender
Male
Firstly, it's hardly scientific to deny the possibility of a correlation between physical characteristics without citing any experimental or theoretical support for your claim.

Secondly, it's hardly scientific to then attempt to validate your claim with a single instance anecdotal tale, which is similar to saying "I don't believe cigarettes are harmful because my grandad smoked 80 a day and he lived to be 96".

Scientist. Lol
Where did I say my anecdote was some sort of ironclad scientific analysis? It was just a story counter to the various ones he told that were equally anecdotal.

The burden of proof isn't on the negative argument. He needs to pony up scientific evidence of his own before I bother to try to delve into the task of proving him wrong.

The default scientific position is to be skeptical.

And my life's work is literally the study of human cancer genetics. If you want to talk about that, I'd be happy to. Vagina depth, on the other hand, isn't an area I find overly interesting.

Bring something more to the table than being a smarmy dumbass and we'll talk.
 

ignatius4446z

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Posts
408
Media
14
Likes
243
Points
78
Location
In the dreams of a mischievous demon
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Where did I say my anecdote was some sort of ironclad scientific analysis? It was just a story counter to the various ones he told that were equally anecdotal.

The burden of proof isn't on the negative argument. He needs to pony up scientific evidence of his own before I bother to try to delve into the task of proving him wrong.

The default scientific position is to be skeptical.

And my life's work is literally the study of human cancer genetics. If you want to talk about that, I'd be happy to. Vagina depth, on the other hand, isn't an area I find overly interesting.

Bring something more to the table than being a smarmy dumbass and we'll talk.

What a touchy little prick......lol
 
5

589189

Guest
i say no to taking a big cock all the time..... i wear underwear almost 24/7 to ensure i dont have to deal with it, besides i hate to look down on the 'unemployed'.
 
9

916416

Guest
Only thing I've been turned down for is anal and deep-throating. Otherwise it always fits.
 

ten2ride

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
131
Media
14
Likes
1,545
Points
363
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Women who need to rub pelvis to pelvis in order to stimulate their clit and are not deep enough to take a huge cock without internal "bottoming out" pain become very frustrated, end up trying to take the pain just to get an orgasm, then are sore after for a few days.
He vast majority of women feel great pain when a long cock bottoms out inside them, and honestly few women's vaginas are deeper than 7 or 8 inches, so if experienced with cocks longer than that, and seriously know their bodies will most definitely turn down a big cock. I've been turned down quite a few times for these very reasons. Even some of the best fucks I've ever had eventually ended their sexual relationship with me because of the pain...really sucks to have a prize in my pants & have women know it won't work for them...
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted875903

Fencepost

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Posts
429
Media
3
Likes
789
Points
248
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I dated a tiny, beautiful lady. She was 5'1" and 97#. Slim waist and hips and a 34C bust- very big for such a small lady. Sex was always painful for her, even after much pussy licking. Both my length and girth were too much for her, and when we finished, she had tears in her eyes. She really liked me, and tried to be a trooper, but I could not bear to hurt her, and I broke off the relationship. Sigh. She was a super girl and I still miss her. I am really not huge, just big, but she was shallow and tight inside. Sigh.
 

shortymike

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Posts
233
Media
23
Likes
1,060
Points
323
Location
Hawaii (United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
The reaction I just got this weekend was "THAT THING IS RIDICULOUS!" I tried to assure her that I'd go slow and I wouldn't force it all the way in until she was comfortable. She responded--"No thanks I'll pass..."

It had been awhile since I tried dating a regular woman I met with my dating profile, I'd been getting by in life with porn and prostitutes. However, I gave it a try again recently. She was a very nice chubby and big breasted red head. I was hoping we'd hit it off. Her profile asked for a lot of characteristics that I have, but the title was "Seeking White and Well Endowed." In the pictures I sent and when we met she could clearly see my bulge. I'll have to start including dick pics with my responses again. I may end up offending some women, but it's better to save time I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tttfreetime

Betty_Cocker

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Posts
3,310
Media
0
Likes
8,539
Points
433
Location
United States
Verification
View
I find it rather interesting that people put things like "seeking well endowed" or "looking to meet up" in their bio and they are total BS.

Makes it really hard for the serious players to connect. I became super cynical during my play days.

I put both in my bio and 1. Never met a cock I would turn down for being too big and 2. Some guys think 6" is well endowed! 3. Many "wanted to play" in their head but was too afraid to step out from behind the computer.

And. .. if you are seeking a relationship based on sex. ... you don't have to send cock pick right off the bat but when the conversation turns in that direction. ...ask her if you can send one. I found camming to be a better option for verification than pix.
 

bobg4400

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Posts
2,718
Media
1
Likes
521
Points
258
Location
UK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
lol, that's pretty funny.

It's a lot easier to just snap a quick pic and send it than it is to use a webcam, especially since most people don't actually have one, so either they buy one or they use their phone as one, it's a bit of a hassle to go through the first time.
 

Shackleford

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Posts
1,264
Media
54
Likes
6,949
Points
543
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Why are guys so afraid to show their dick on cam?

I've never cammed with the intent of working toward a hookup, but my assumption would be most of those guys fell under your #3 above and couldn't deliver the goods they were advertising in their fantasy.

For the ones who were serious, well, you can re-take pics until you get the perfect one. On cam in that situation, you're being judged on one take. Maybe that's too much pressure for some.