Saying No To A Big Cock.

TinyPrincess

Mythical Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Posts
15,829
Media
2
Likes
31,048
Points
368
Location
Copenhagen (Capital Region, Denmark)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Maybe that depends on her Definition of her "well hungs males", her Definition of "big thick cocks" and mostly it depends on what PERFECTION means to her ;)

but if she knew that everyony has a different Definition of These things, she also knew her question is absolutely not neccessary... :D

:biggrin1:

Would she turn you down :wink:
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted515036

rope9839

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Posts
1,911
Media
11
Likes
4,012
Points
368
Location
Michigan, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I have never been immediately turned down outright, but a it has been a factor in the break up of a couple of short term relationship. You absolutely can be too big.
 

Thickster

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Posts
117
Media
7
Likes
66
Points
113
Location
Germany
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It can happen. Depending on the womanßs anatomy penetration till midshaft is impossible...even with a gallon of lube :/
 

TheBestYouCan

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Posts
827
Media
203
Likes
2,306
Points
263
Location
U.S.
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I went on a cruise last year with a group of people about my age. One of the girls that went and I hooked up frequently throughout. Recently we started talking about how it would be fun to meet up on a travel vaca again.. but when the subject of sex came up she was reluctant because of how uncomfortable sex was for her.

A combination of girth making her sore and also the ole cervix punch coupled with the time it takes me to cum. I blame porn and edging forever. So yes, you can get turned down and yes it sucks. This particular young lady is a blast to hang out with and also very sensual and enjoyable in bed.
 

zool80

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Posts
167
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
63
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
There can be a size mismatch between specific people - but there's IMHO no "too big" cock - just mismatch and personal preferences...

I agree...however, I'll wager that with increasing cock size the number of mismatches will also get up.

But personal preference plays a huge part too... I was rejected by a girl once, who could surely have accommodated my cock (I have a lot of girth, but not that big overall) from a purely anatomical point of view...but she just wouldn't want to try it because it was too thick for her taste.
 

rope9839

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Posts
1,911
Media
11
Likes
4,012
Points
368
Location
Michigan, USA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
There can be a size mismatch between specific people - but there's IMHO no "too big" cock - just mismatch and personal preferences...

Since I was referencing a couple of relationships and not a general preference, quoting only the last sentence of my post changed the meaning completely. Stating that it was a factor in a couple relationships wasn't anything close to saying it was a universal preference. Obivously, there was a size mismatch in these instances and their legitimate preferences (and mine) played a large role in ending those individual relationships.

Basically, if you would like to make a point, stick the the intent of the original post when you selectively pull out a single quote.
 
3

326807

Guest
I'm 9"x7" and I've never run into a girl who couldn't take me,perhaps my head bottoms out against their cervix,and perhaps I've only been fully deep throated once-but the silly claims of 5-6 " being too big to fuck are just silly or worse wishful thinking
 

Holly38G

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Posts
95
Media
0
Likes
13
Points
163
Location
Houston, but I work for an airline so I travel
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Female
Ladies ,

I'm having some trouble on understanding what I have been told my a couple of well hung males. Is it true that women actually turn down a large cock because of its size?!?!?!?!?! I am so in love with big thick cocks I could not imagine turning one down. Have any of you experienced this? I am in total shock that someone would turn away perfection.

I've been very lucky & have been with quite a few really enormous men. some where shockingly big but lots of fun & eventually took them all. I have only seen one too big. a long time ago some friends took me to a huge swingers hotel party. entire hotel for the weekend. one man was putting on shows & showing off his third leg tripod. it was a HOT show but he was so scary big no one would have sex with him.
 

BigItalianGuy

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Posts
113
Media
16
Likes
1,180
Points
463
Location
New Jersey (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
I had a fwb relationship with a short and slightly chubby ex-coworker that had huge tits and a pretty decent ass. We met a few times and she called it off because she said it was too big and hurt her too much. I did enjoy pounding her hard but she couldnt take it
 

Betty_Cocker

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Posts
3,310
Media
0
Likes
8,539
Points
433
Location
United States
Verification
View
I went on a cruise last year with a group of people about my age. One of the girls that went and I hooked up frequently throughout. Recently we started talking about how it would be fun to meet up on a travel vaca again.. but when the subject of sex came up she was reluctant because of how uncomfortable sex was for her.

A combination of girth making her sore and also the ole cervix punch coupled with the time it takes me to cum. I blame porn and edging forever. So yes, you can get turned down and yes it sucks. This particular young lady is a blast to hang out with and also very sensual and enjoyable in bed.
Just reading this. ..but proof that you can enjoy a guy's company and want to hang out without intercourse.

Just looking at your beautiful body and having intelligent conversation would be reason enough to vacay together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBestYouCan

Betty_Cocker

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Posts
3,310
Media
0
Likes
8,539
Points
433
Location
United States
Verification
View
Not all vaginas are created equal. Just like there are different penis sizes there are many different sizes of vaginas out there.


that's not part of our declaration of independence, huh? ;)

"all men (and women) are created equal" ... those men had no idea what they started!
 

BigBen

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Posts
3,563
Media
0
Likes
5,868
Points
593
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Not all vaginas are created equal. Just like there are different penis sizes there are many different sizes of vaginas out there.

This is so true. I got the genetics from both sides of my family. Both grandfathers, uncles, father, cousins, all enormous. But growing up, my older relatives shared some things on how a man might tell about a woman's natural vagina size, and ability to stretch wider or not, and depth or not. I heard at an early age the limerick "Tall woman, big hole, short woman ALL hole." It was explained that "tall" was 5'9" and over, and short was 5'2" and less. Over the decades, I've heard others repeat that same limerick.

There are exceptions, of course. And some women get "stretched out" by natural birthing of multiple children, and extended relationships with other big to bigger to biggest very extremely endowed men.

And while it doesn't always hold true, I've noticed some other visual indicators of a woman's appearance that seem to correlate with the depth and size of a ladies vagina. Keep in mind that in my experience, these are not hard and fast rules, but do seem to have a correlation. And the more "indicators", the more likely I've found that it is true. And with those ladies who I've met who have three quarters or more of the "indicators" it has always held true, without exception. So scoff if you like, these are just things I've noticed. And interestingly to me, some of the women told me they themselves knew this too and how their own outer physical traits, within their own families, were indicators as well to them that had the familial trait of a "big pussy".

For a lady blessed with a deeper vagina...even in her own opinion she is herself "bottomless".
1. A long angular face structure.
2. A long forehead.
3. A long nose line.
4. A long angular chin.
5. A long neck.
6. Long, thin arms.
7. Long thin hands and fingers.
8. A long for her height torso.
9. Heavy/thick hair, eyebrows, and pubic hair (if she hasn't shaved/trimmed, this is easier to tell but often the remaining outline of where the lady grows to is the indicator).
10. Busty for her frame...though I've noticed this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but sometimes it is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.
11. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms. C on lpsg has similar legs.

For a lady naturally blessed with a wider stretching vagina, able to adjust comfortably to a lot of girth/width, not altered in life by multiple childbirths or experiences with other men.
1. A wide forehead with the hairline back on the sides of the head.
2. The eye sockets are wider to the very edge of the face contour.
3. The nostrils of the nose are wider and prominently so.
4. The mouth is wider than most women's.
5. Long hands and fingers.
6. Butt is not necessarily big, often high and somewhat small, but the pelvis seems to be wider creating a gap between their legs.
7. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms C on lpsg has similar legs.
8. Busty for her frame...thought I've noticed that this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but it sometimes is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.

I am not a scientist, but I would suspect that untold generations of attraction and physical sexual compatibility have over millennium have genetically grouped characteristics that work and at least a modicum of attraction together to provide "types" that show some less....some more....of the physical traits. Very few women I've met have them all. But in every case, they all were the proud owners of a beautiful gigantically wide and super deep vagina, and always were also able to stretch easier for entrance to their uterus canal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rewardheragain148

Guy-jin

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Posts
3,836
Media
3
Likes
1,368
Points
333
Location
San Jose (California, United States)
Sexuality
Asexual
Gender
Male
This is so true. I got the genetics from both sides of my family. Both grandfathers, uncles, father, cousins, all enormous. But growing up, my older relatives shared some things on how a man might tell about a woman's natural vagina size, and ability to stretch wider or not, and depth or not. I heard at an early age the limerick "Tall woman, big hole, short woman ALL hole." It was explained that "tall" was 5'9" and over, and short was 5'2" and less. Over the decades, I've heard others repeat that same limerick.

There are exceptions, of course. And some women get "stretched out" by natural birthing of multiple children, and extended relationships with other big to bigger to biggest very extremely endowed men.

And while it doesn't always hold true, I've noticed some other visual indicators of a woman's appearance that seem to correlate with the depth and size of a ladies vagina. Keep in mind that in my experience, these are not hard and fast rules, but do seem to have a correlation. And the more "indicators", the more likely I've found that it is true. And with those ladies who I've met who have three quarters or more of the "indicators" it has always held true, without exception. So scoff if you like, these are just things I've noticed. And interestingly to me, some of the women told me they themselves knew this too and how their own outer physical traits, within their own families, were indicators as well to them that had the familial trait of a "big pussy".

For a lady blessed with a deeper vagina...even in her own opinion she is herself "bottomless".
1. A long angular face structure.
2. A long forehead.
3. A long nose line.
4. A long angular chin.
5. A long neck.
6. Long, thin arms.
7. Long thin hands and fingers.
8. A long for her height torso.
9. Heavy/thick hair, eyebrows, and pubic hair (if she hasn't shaved/trimmed, this is easier to tell but often the remaining outline of where the lady grows to is the indicator).
10. Busty for her frame...though I've noticed this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but sometimes it is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.
11. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms. C on lpsg has similar legs.

For a lady naturally blessed with a wider stretching vagina, able to adjust comfortably to a lot of girth/width, not altered in life by multiple childbirths or experiences with other men.
1. A wide forehead with the hairline back on the sides of the head.
2. The eye sockets are wider to the very edge of the face contour.
3. The nostrils of the nose are wider and prominently so.
4. The mouth is wider than most women's.
5. Long hands and fingers.
6. Butt is not necessarily big, often high and somewhat small, but the pelvis seems to be wider creating a gap between their legs.
7. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms C on lpsg has similar legs.
8. Busty for her frame...thought I've noticed that this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but it sometimes is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.

I am not a scientist, but I would suspect that untold generations of attraction and physical sexual compatibility have over millennium have genetically grouped characteristics that work and at least a modicum of attraction together to provide "types" that show some less....some more....of the physical traits. Very few women I've met have them all. But in every case, they all were the proud owners of a beautiful gigantically wide and super deep vagina, and always were also able to stretch easier for entrance to their uterus canal.
I am a scientist and... no, this has no bearing in reality. Sorry, dude.

Woman with the deepest, widest, most accommodating vagina that I ever met was 4'11", half-Chinese half-Japanese, round face, large eyes, very small breasts, very small nose, teensy butt... I could go on, but you get the idea. She did kegals quite a bit and had the most amazing control of the muscles of her vaginal wall. Sufficed to say, she and I were very compatible.