Not all vaginas are created equal. Just like there are different penis sizes there are many different sizes of vaginas out there.
This is so true. I got the genetics from both sides of my family. Both grandfathers, uncles, father, cousins, all enormous. But growing up, my older relatives shared some things on how a man might tell about a woman's natural vagina size, and ability to stretch wider or not, and depth or not. I heard at an early age the limerick "Tall woman, big hole, short woman ALL hole." It was explained that "tall" was 5'9" and over, and short was 5'2" and less. Over the decades, I've heard others repeat that same limerick.
There are exceptions, of course. And some women get "stretched out" by natural birthing of multiple children, and extended relationships with other big to bigger to biggest very extremely endowed men.
And while it doesn't always hold true, I've noticed some other visual indicators of a woman's appearance that seem to correlate with the depth and size of a ladies vagina. Keep in mind that in my experience, these are not hard and fast rules, but do seem to have a correlation. And the more "indicators", the more likely I've found that it is true. And with those ladies who I've met who have three quarters or more of the "indicators" it has always held true, without exception. So scoff if you like, these are just things I've noticed. And interestingly to me, some of the women told me they themselves knew this too and how their own outer physical traits, within their own families, were indicators as well to them that had the familial trait of a "big pussy".
For a lady blessed with a deeper vagina...even in her own opinion she is herself "bottomless".
1. A long angular face structure.
2. A long forehead.
3. A long nose line.
4. A long angular chin.
5. A long neck.
6. Long, thin arms.
7. Long thin hands and fingers.
8. A long for her height torso.
9. Heavy/thick hair, eyebrows, and pubic hair (if she hasn't shaved/trimmed, this is easier to tell but often the remaining outline of where the lady grows to is the indicator).
10. Busty for her frame...though I've noticed this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but sometimes it is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.
11. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms. C on lpsg has similar legs.
For a lady naturally blessed with a wider stretching vagina, able to adjust comfortably to a lot of girth/width, not altered in life by multiple childbirths or experiences with other men.
1. A wide forehead with the hairline back on the sides of the head.
2. The eye sockets are wider to the very edge of the face contour.
3. The nostrils of the nose are wider and prominently so.
4. The mouth is wider than most women's.
5. Long hands and fingers.
6. Butt is not necessarily big, often high and somewhat small, but the pelvis seems to be wider creating a gap between their legs.
7. Thin or thinner legs, or athletic "dancer" legs. As an example I've noticed from her pictures Ms C on lpsg has similar legs.
8. Busty for her frame...thought I've noticed that this is not always the case for the tallest ladies who have all the other "features", but it sometimes is. Keep in mind "busty" is not a C or D cup, but significantly larger.
I am not a scientist, but I would suspect that untold generations of attraction and physical sexual compatibility have over millennium have genetically grouped characteristics that work and at least a modicum of attraction together to provide "types" that show some less....some more....of the physical traits. Very few women I've met have them all. But in every case, they all were the proud owners of a beautiful gigantically wide and super deep vagina, and always were also able to stretch easier for entrance to their uterus canal.