Tall Men over 7 feet, size comparable?

bobg4400

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Posts
2,718
Media
1
Likes
522
Points
258
Location
UK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I never believe anyone saying it's a semi. If there's one thing I can be certain of in this world, it's that most men don't release unflattering pictures of their dicks. This site is full of guys measuring and captioning it 'not fully hard', so that they can always say they actually grow bigger. Gets old really fast. It's usually just a guy who has a downward-pointing erection.

did you see that thread a week ago where that guy claimed his veiny, rock hard downward-pointing dick was 100% soft and just flopping into the sink?
 

bigman777

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Posts
284
Media
19
Likes
162
Points
288
Location
Aberdeen (Aberdeen City, Scotland)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Whilst I realise this is meant for people taller than me, just thought I'd add my thoughts to it, I'm 6'6 and whilst I'm not badly endowed, there are many others on this site better endowed than myself. Also, due to my height, what I do have doesn't look as impressive as it might do on a smaller person. Still I'm happy with both my height and cock, so can't complain!
 

IrishAsal

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Posts
56
Media
6
Likes
162
Points
178
Location
Texas
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Jesus this place is retarded.

It's well documented that men of average height are more likely to have bigger than average penii. Men who are at either end of the height spectrum are more likely to be smaller.

Hormones, how do they work?
 

BBClovingMILF

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Posts
212
Media
6
Likes
74
Points
263
Location
West coast
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Height and cock size have NOTHING to do with each other. I dated a guy that was 6'8' a couple of years ago and he was quite small. He was maybe 5 inches errect, which looked even smaller considering his height.

Same here EXCEPT we didn't date or have sex cuz it was too small. :biggrin1:
 

B_avast

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Posts
79
Media
6
Likes
0
Points
41
Location
western europe
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Jesus this place is retarded.

It's well documented that men of average height are more likely to have bigger than average penii. Men who are at either end of the height spectrum are more likely to be smaller.

Hormones, how do they work?

actually giantism is often linked to underdevelopment of genitalia due to hormones...
 

dude77007

Legendary Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Posts
565
Media
0
Likes
1,226
Points
323
Location
Texas (United States)
Gender
Male
I don't care whether there's a correlation or no correlation, I wonder why you seldom see nude pics of real tall guys, the over 6'5" types, I would like to, I don't care what they are packing. As a group, they seem to be real shy.
 

D_Aberchirder_Crustinuts

Account Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Posts
619
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
I don't care whether there's a correlation or no correlation, I wonder why you seldom see nude pics of real tall guys, the over 6'5" types, I would like to, I don't care what they are packing. As a group, they seem to be real shy.
It may be because everyone still assumes they have foot long dicks. May get better after a while as people get a little more sense.

On the other hand, we can't be so sure we don't see them already. Half the porn people are way shorter than they look, so if we can't always tell a guy is 5'6" from a nude/sex photo, maybe we can't tell that he's 6'5" either. :wink:

Crunch
 

theknob8

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Posts
121
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
53
I'm surprised by most of these answers. I've never known someone who was 7 foot but I knew a few who were 6'8 and they had big ones. I am 6'4'' and have a pretty big one. A lot of guys I know over 6 feet have big ones too.

I do have small hands though. so the whole hand to dick ratio is a myth.
 

Crvmad

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Posts
6
Media
8
Likes
129
Points
298
Age
41
Location
Tennessee
Gender
Male
Funny you should say this. I was at a football game 2 weeks ago and as I was walking to wash my hands, there was a kid just talking up a storm. He was asking a man who was 7 ft tall or more all these questions. Skip to like an hour and half later and i mosey on up to the pisser and guess who comes next to me but Mr. 7 plus. he was so tall that the urinal like like a kid sized on on him. Lets say that it wasn't what i expected
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
684
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm surprised by most of these answers. I've never known someone who was 7 foot but I knew a few who were 6'8 and they had big ones. I am 6'4'' and have a pretty big one. A lot of guys I know over 6 feet have big ones too.

I do have small hands though. so the whole hand to dick ratio is a myth.
There is a small correlation with height and penis lenght, just as it is for every part of the human body.
I wrote "small correlation". ( Vetruvian man - Da Vinci )
I'm just over 6 feet, have larger hands than many, big nose, big feet, big ears, big mouth and yes downwards also larger than many.
But a small correlation isn't a 1 on 1 factor... But the taller the man is, the more chance that he has something in his pants...
 

FuzzyKen

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Posts
2,045
Media
0
Likes
100
Points
193
Gender
Male
I am soooo curious...do tall men over 7 feet have a cock to match? if so how tall and how many inches is it?


There are a great number of factors that have to be considered here. Is the size or height the result of genetics or of a pituitary disorder known as Acromegaly. Megaloid males are not usually larger than the general population simply because the over abundence of growth hormone has a negative impact in other areas.

I have in my lifetime known two megaloid individuals. One female and the other a gay male. The gay male was in his 30's and was 7'3" in height. Genitals were above average in that they were about 7 in length and average girth. The condition caused rapid growth without bone closure which accounted for the general size of the body, but the same did not happen for genitals. Last time I saw this fellow he was doing well. By the way, talk about a fellow who had a hard time meeting people he was the poster child for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: what746 and malito

stratman

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
29
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
223
I am not gay (I know, famous last words) nor have I ever measured anyone other than myself, nor have I seen anyone erect (I think). But here is the anecdotal information on flaccid 7-foot cocks I have.

In the mid 80s, I covered the basketball beat for west coast conference university. Having seen hundreds of nude men and interviewed them nude (even some professional players) my experience is there is little difference among men up to around 6' 7" or so. Emphasis on "or so". Some appear huge, some don't. But so do guys at 5'10.

Things change at around 6'9" or so. I have never seen a "small" man at 6-9 or taller. Ever. the 7 footers all are significantly hung in a flaccid state. No question about it, at least in my sampling.

I am only 5-7 but have a number of non-sports friends who are well into the 6 foot range. My closest friend growing up is now 6-4 and is enormous. Scary thick and multiple times my size flaccid. He was huge and everyone who knew him.. knew it.

A kid who lived on my street is 6-9 (and wickedly skinny). He is hung. God bless him; not the most attractive guy but he got the girls. Not hard to imagine why.

But my college room mate who was 6-5 was remarkably average. A good friend I met later in life is 6-3 and probably larger than average.

Bottom line. Of the the tall guys or basketball players I saw, there are the normal differences. But I never saw an average hung guy of 6-9 or 6-10 or 7 feet. Compared to us normal folks, they blew away the averages (excuse the pun).

The largest I ever saw was a pro player. The guy was longer than my leg. Messed my mind up for a while; I felt ridiculous inadequate.
 

bobg4400

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Posts
2,718
Media
1
Likes
522
Points
258
Location
UK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I am not gay (I know, famous last words) nor have I ever measured anyone other than myself, nor have I seen anyone erect (I think). But here is the anecdotal information on flaccid 7-foot cocks I have.

In the mid 80s, I covered the basketball beat for west coast conference university. Having seen hundreds of nude men and interviewed them nude (even some professional players) my experience is there is little difference among men up to around 6' 7" or so. Emphasis on "or so". Some appear huge, some don't. But so do guys at 5'10.

Things change at around 6'9" or so. I have never seen a "small" man at 6-9 or taller. Ever. the 7 footers all are significantly hung in a flaccid state. No question about it, at least in my sampling.

I am only 5-7 but have a number of non-sports friends who are well into the 6 foot range. My closest friend growing up is now 6-4 and is enormous. Scary thick and multiple times my size flaccid. He was huge and everyone who knew him.. knew it.

A kid who lived on my street is 6-9 (and wickedly skinny). He is hung. God bless him; not the most attractive guy but he got the girls. Not hard to imagine why.

But my college room mate who was 6-5 was remarkably average. A good friend I met later in life is 6-3 and probably larger than average.

Bottom line. Of the the tall guys or basketball players I saw, there are the normal differences. But I never saw an average hung guy of 6-9 or 6-10 or 7 feet. Compared to us normal folks, they blew away the averages (excuse the pun).

The largest I ever saw was a pro player. The guy was longer than my leg. Messed my mind up for a while; I felt ridiculous inadequate.


The fuck? that would be over 2 feet in length :confused:
 

stratman

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
29
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
223
Sorry, I was not talking literally Should have said it "seemed" longer than my leg. It wasn't obviously, but it was longer than anything I had ever seen.

Not trying to exaggerate.
 

D_Aberchirder_Crustinuts

Account Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Posts
619
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
I have never seen a "small" man at 6-9 or taller. Ever. the 7 footers all are significantly hung in a flaccid state.
Maybe it's a result of the same thing that causes our own dicks to look smaller when we look 'down' at them. If you're normal height, isn't a 7' guy's dick like at "eye level" or something? :biggrin1:
 

stratman

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Posts
29
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
223
Crunch, you could be right. I've been shorter all my life :) so I don't know any other perspective. But I've seen all heights during my reporting days, and saw lots of differences. The 6-9ers -plus do seen significantly larger -- and my interviews were done when the athletes were sitting and standing.

But as you say: they are significantly taller too and sight line perspectives are different.

There are always exceptions and anomolies. But that was my insight for what it is worth.
 

Uncutsouthernboy

Superior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
1,704
Media
7
Likes
6,596
Points
418
Location
Georgia
Gender
Male
A friend of mine in college was 6'10. He had the smallest dick I have ever seen on an adult male. I even saw it hard one time. It had to be 2.5-3.0' on hard. He was also cut. He didn't seem to be very self-conscious about it either.