Until we see some vague moniker of expertise like a doctorate in anatomy, physiology, or medicine hanging from your name, I think siding with science is better than siding with hot air.
The Penis is a Muscle!
- Thread starter remek
- Start date
I think you are a bit confused here....i am the one siding with science...you are the one buying the B.S. anyway, no hard feelings...oh and good luck to anyone who wishes to waste time, money, and risk damage for some imagined gain.:wink:
If you are siding with science then please produce any study that says it's impossible. Any!
I don't deny that doctors frequently say that it's impossible but then they've never investigated the subject nor bothered to research it. They're repeating conventional wisdom because they think it's the best thing for you psychologically.
Remember, just a few years ago erectile dysfunction (ED) was nearly always thought to be psychological in nature but when Viagra hit the streets, suddenly the preponderance of opinion changed to ED being nearly always physical. Medical opinion does change but there need to be catalysts to do so and, until there is more research, I don't think any physician can honestly refute the single study devoted to the subject. I agree that the Richards study sample was too small for statistical significance but it remains the only published study extant even thought the results were found to be promising.
No hard feelings either. It's just a boxing match to me. Short of this subject I think you're pretty decent.
I don't deny that doctors frequently say that it's impossible but then they've never investigated the subject nor bothered to research it. They're repeating conventional wisdom because they think it's the best thing for you psychologically.
Remember, just a few years ago erectile dysfunction (ED) was nearly always thought to be psychological in nature but when Viagra hit the streets, suddenly the preponderance of opinion changed to ED being nearly always physical. Medical opinion does change but there need to be catalysts to do so and, until there is more research, I don't think any physician can honestly refute the single study devoted to the subject. I agree that the Richards study sample was too small for statistical significance but it remains the only published study extant even thought the results were found to be promising.
No hard feelings either. It's just a boxing match to me. Short of this subject I think you're pretty decent.
B_Gaylord69
Experimental Member
No matter what you call the tissue in the penis, I will testify that most men can increase the size of their penis if they devote the time and effort necessary(no money) and at any age. At age 60 I started PE with self developed exercises, saw it would work, (like a dump ass)bought a canned program(threw it in the garbage), continued with self developed techniques and those found on a free forum. It took me a little over a year to go from 7" x 5.7" to 8.75" x 6.25"
My favorite self size comparison pic is attached. The largest is actual and the smaller ones resized to illustrate my size at that time. The smallest when I was 16, the middle when I was 60, and the last I was 67.
My favorite self size comparison pic is attached. The largest is actual and the smaller ones resized to illustrate my size at that time. The smallest when I was 16, the middle when I was 60, and the last I was 67.
Attachments
Who do you think you are fooling with those pictures?? please, this is just the kind of thing that lends even less credibility (if thats even possible) to those who claim to have permanent gains from PE.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Posts
- 22,256
- Media
- 213
- Likes
- 32,277
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
That's exactly the same pic enlarged twice.......My humble opinion, penis enlargement is equivalant to snake oil. My nonerect penis is about 2 inches, my erect penis is 8.5 inches. Where does all that "Muscle" go when I'm flaccid????
Radicaldick and Industrialized - It would be good if you two would read and understand the post before you criticize. I very pointedly commented that the first two pictures were to illustrate my size at those periods of my life.
The third picture was my actual size at age 67.
Now, I will say that you have a right to your opinion whether it be on whether PE works or not or what type tissue the penis is made up of. You even have the right to your opinion on whether I gained or not.
Again, I will state for a fact that I did gain from 7" x 5.7" to 8.75" x 6.25", To me that says that PE is not only possible but it works. I don't know how you arrived at the fact???? PE does not work if you haven't given it a fair trial. I'm sure you wouldn't make such a calm on hearsay alone.
The third picture was my actual size at age 67.
Now, I will say that you have a right to your opinion whether it be on whether PE works or not or what type tissue the penis is made up of. You even have the right to your opinion on whether I gained or not.
Again, I will state for a fact that I did gain from 7" x 5.7" to 8.75" x 6.25", To me that says that PE is not only possible but it works. I don't know how you arrived at the fact???? PE does not work if you haven't given it a fair trial. I'm sure you wouldn't make such a calm on hearsay alone.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Posts
- 22,256
- Media
- 213
- Likes
- 32,277
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
doesn't change the fact that it's the same pic 3 times and illustrates nothing
He said 16, 60, and 67. ROFL...he took the same picture, in the same place, three times, from the same angle, over the course of 44 and 7 years?
Bullshite, sir, bullshite.
Bullshite, sir, bullshite.
Wow...seriously? That's insane! lol.
I can't beleive I even take the time. Quoting the original post, "resized to illustrate". I told this forum up front that they were "resized" to "illustrate" my size at that time(age 16 and before PE) as compared to pic 3 which is present.
Just read playainda's response. Can't beleive 2 grown men can't read or comprehend english. I can beleive that most members would not subject themselves to the barrage of critcism from unqualified critics and naysayers.
I leave the rest of this discussion to all of you. I done.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Posts
- 22,256
- Media
- 213
- Likes
- 32,277
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
then I'll repeat myself again
doesn't change the fact that it's the same pic 3 times and illustrates nothing!
what was the point of showing the same pic 3 times????You would have been more convincing if you showed 3 different pics at 3 different stages of your "growth"
doesn't change the fact that it's the same pic 3 times and illustrates nothing!
what was the point of showing the same pic 3 times????You would have been more convincing if you showed 3 different pics at 3 different stages of your "growth"
crescendo69
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2006
- Posts
- 7,786
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 163
- Points
- 283
- Age
- 70
- Location
- Knoxville (Tennessee, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
This one is pretty simple to prove.
Normally I don't take the time to call people on fakes, but this one was so obvious. It's highly improbable to take the same picture the same way three times...nevertheless a picture from you being 16 to a picture where you are 67?
In the picture, he's standing over something...a chair/desk maybe. So he's kept this same chair/desk from age 16 to age 67? And I'm pretty sure his pubic hair would look slightly different from 16 to 67.
Normally I don't take the time to call people on fakes, but this one was so obvious. It's highly improbable to take the same picture the same way three times...nevertheless a picture from you being 16 to a picture where you are 67?
In the picture, he's standing over something...a chair/desk maybe. So he's kept this same chair/desk from age 16 to age 67? And I'm pretty sure his pubic hair would look slightly different from 16 to 67.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Posts
- 822
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 486
- Points
- 383
- Location
- Calgary (Alberta, Canada)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
This isn't rocket science people
The penis is mostly made of a sponge tissue, a tube for urination and ejaculation, and a nervous sytem (of which I think god on a daily basis).
People with more porous sponge tissue tend to shrink to be smaller when at rest and more blood is required to fill the same amount of sponge area than one that is less porous. Hense the difference between a grower and a shower.
The cock fills with blood giving the person an erection. The muscles at the bottom of the groin can be tightened and loosened to make the cock seem to be a muscle. On tightening a bit more blood is forced into the penis causing it to become harder and appear to be a muscle itself.
The penis is mostly made of a sponge tissue, a tube for urination and ejaculation, and a nervous sytem (of which I think god on a daily basis).
People with more porous sponge tissue tend to shrink to be smaller when at rest and more blood is required to fill the same amount of sponge area than one that is less porous. Hense the difference between a grower and a shower.
The cock fills with blood giving the person an erection. The muscles at the bottom of the groin can be tightened and loosened to make the cock seem to be a muscle. On tightening a bit more blood is forced into the penis causing it to become harder and appear to be a muscle itself.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Posts
- 822
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 486
- Points
- 383
- Location
- Calgary (Alberta, Canada)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
RE: My favorite self size comparison pic is attached. The largest is actual and the smaller ones resized to illustrate my size at that time. The smallest when I was 16, the middle when I was 60, and the last I was 67.
HA HA I really like the way the upolstry fabric dots get larger too!!
(sooooooooo busted!!!!)
HA HA I really like the way the upolstry fabric dots get larger too!!
(sooooooooo busted!!!!)
Fowfer states the picture does not show ANY growth.
The picture was posted to show the relative changes to his penis over time even though the picture shows NO growth and is NOT of his penis.
There is nothing to bust because Fowfer did not claim it shows growth.
The picture was posted to show the relative changes to his penis over time even though the picture shows NO growth and is NOT of his penis.
There is nothing to bust because Fowfer did not claim it shows growth.
Clearly.
I sometimes wonder why you bother with this site. I've grown very tired of spinning my wheels here, and don't really have the time lately.
Similar threads
