Tight scrotum
- Thread starter icebergslm5506
- Start date
handcuffsfan4
Admired Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2006
- Posts
- 550
- Media
- 14
- Likes
- 783
- Points
- 248
- Location
- Arcata (California, United States)
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
yeah hypolimnas mine make that noise when i go down the stairs or i run. its also wierd jumping rope and doing jumping jacks.
hypolimnas
Superior Member
handcuffsfan4 said:
Dude: Do Not jump rope, or do jumping jacks, when flopping your balls around on the stairs!
I have the opposite problem and it REALLY REALLY bothers me. My balls are hanging too low, which makes it uncomfortable and makes the cock look small. Any way to make it tight? I always wanted to go to public showers but this is blocking me. HELP.
From what i read i see that some guys LOVE low hangers, why?
From what i read i see that some guys LOVE low hangers, why?
bulbul said:
There's a wide range of what's normal when it comes to male genitalia. You need to be happy with what you have. Mine aren't as extremely low hanging as yours are but as I've gotten older they do hang more than they used to. Bike riding is awkward but not impossible.
I've never heard of an operation to reduce the scrotal sac. Don't let it stop you from having a life as life is too short the way it is.
digitalninja
Just Browsing
I personally like it when my sac hangs low. Like stated before it makes me feel like I have a longer penis. Its Psychological.
cute5
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Posts
- 146
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 11
- Points
- 163
- Age
- 68
- Location
- North Texas
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
i thought i might resurrect this thread as I used to suffer the same thing. One other reason why the scrotum may tighten is because of some kind of stress in the body. It is related to the 'fight' or 'flight' reaction ie. your body will pull your scrotum up close to the body, if threatened or stressed, to make it diffcult to be kicked in the nuts - don't laugh, it's true! Google it.
In my case, my body suffered a different type of stress - a food intorance, which stressed my body and a tight scrotum was one of the reactions. I have just done a test through my doctor where I was put on a strict diet, systematically excluding different types of food which are known to cause problems (for me it ended up being caffeine).
After a couple of days on the diet my symptoms started to disappear, I was feeling much better and my scrotum was behaving as normal - this was a secondary symptom, by the way, i was also having other types of symptoms (digestive) too.
I'm not saying that this might be what's causing your problem but i thought i would share my experience with you.
In my case, my body suffered a different type of stress - a food intorance, which stressed my body and a tight scrotum was one of the reactions. I have just done a test through my doctor where I was put on a strict diet, systematically excluding different types of food which are known to cause problems (for me it ended up being caffeine).
After a couple of days on the diet my symptoms started to disappear, I was feeling much better and my scrotum was behaving as normal - this was a secondary symptom, by the way, i was also having other types of symptoms (digestive) too.
I'm not saying that this might be what's causing your problem but i thought i would share my experience with you.
I wouldn't bet on age. That shit depends on your skin's elasticity. My senior english teacher was 56 and had the best legs and tush I'd ever seen. And it was all natural. Mine hang low, and are always hot and large. But I work outside in the blistering sun all the time. Sometimes I shock them with cool air because they tighten up and look less grotesque than usual. But my girlfriend prefers them hangin, so I see where you're coming from.
If there is discomfort, I would consult a urologist for possible surgery. Maybe they can snip the sac and pull it down or some shit? Do you want to be uncomfortable until you get old?:biggrin1:
If there is discomfort, I would consult a urologist for possible surgery. Maybe they can snip the sac and pull it down or some shit? Do you want to be uncomfortable until you get old?:biggrin1:
headbang8
Admired Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2004
- Posts
- 1,628
- Media
- 12
- Likes
- 821
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Munich (Bavaria, Germany)
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Same here. When I was young, my balls would cling close to my body at orgasm, and sometimes enter the body like Titanic Jake's. Since they were such large balls, this turned out to be incredibly painful.Sorcerer said:
Now, though, they hang loose enough to be sat on, accidentally. Every silver lining has a cloud, I guess.
For me - there are just times when you want your balls to hang low - it just looks sexier. When the sac is all tight - the "look" of the package isn't so attractive (in my opinion).
In knowing the body's response to heat/cold for protecting sperm, I wish there was a way to just "release" a tight scrotum and just let the balls hang - on command - just like you can make your cock swell "on command".......
In knowing the body's response to heat/cold for protecting sperm, I wish there was a way to just "release" a tight scrotum and just let the balls hang - on command - just like you can make your cock swell "on command".......
Just keep stretching your sac and they will end up like these:
http://forums.newart.com/uploads/cbelow.jpg
or if you really work them hard, these:
http://forums.newart.com/uploads/img_3222_165.jpg
Franky
http://forums.newart.com/uploads/cbelow.jpg
or if you really work them hard, these:
http://forums.newart.com/uploads/img_3222_165.jpg
Franky
Oncamale28
Sexy Member
they can hang a bit if very warm, usually medium hang, but draw up tight when gettting close to cum and way tight almost inside when cumming...
I have always wanted those pendulous low hangers - mine sit up quite high, and it can make the bulge look a bit odd.
I'm 45 and they're still tight as ever. No body has mentioned this, but my left testicle is tighter than the other one and retracts right into my body even if it's just slightly cold. I had one doctor doing my physical that actually said, " you've only got one testicle?"
In the summer, they hang out like best friends slapping around on my thighs, you'd never know they were shy. But the minute I step into an air conditioned building, the left one almost retracts into my throat. Despite all that, I have to say I have no problem with it, they hang when they're supposed to (like in a change room, or on a nude beach) and I have a kid, so I know they funciton. They're just shy sometimes.
In the summer, they hang out like best friends slapping around on my thighs, you'd never know they were shy. But the minute I step into an air conditioned building, the left one almost retracts into my throat. Despite all that, I have to say I have no problem with it, they hang when they're supposed to (like in a change room, or on a nude beach) and I have a kid, so I know they funciton. They're just shy sometimes.
I'm not saying you can't prefer low hangers, but such an obsession with them is fetishistic and unhealthy. Just like I'm not saying you can't prefer uncut penises, but an obsession with the foreskin is fetishistic and pervy.
I don't know what you think women/gays like in a scrotum, but most people outside the realm of fetish think low hangers are gross, or at least less aesthetically pleasing.
The nutsack gets really tight before orgasm, and it is a sign of great excitement, arousal, and sensuality.
And when you have an erection, a tighter scrotum is more aesthetically pleasing, the curves of the genitals flow together more smoothly.
And penis size is not really an issue when it comes to the testicles hanging. Yes, low hangers may expose a little more shaft on the bottom, but they add all sorts of gross dangling skin and wrinkles and "webbing" potentially. Only someone obsessed with incremental size differences would care.
And you don't measure along the bottom anyway. All the exposed bottom-shaft in the world wont make you look bigger because people judge that from the top-length, no matter how much some porn tries to create the illusion of "huge" penises by always showing them from the bottom up (and zoomed so that they compare deceptively with the face and rest of the body in the distance). A full-body profile side view of a man with his erection is really the only way to judge size accurately, especially in photos or videos. And you will notice such straightforward side-view displays of erections are rare in porn, as it tries to create it's illusions by making the size ambiguous and not providing good markers for objective comparison.
But low hangers are gross. They make the balls look...exhausted. The sack "melts" like that when it is hot or tired. Tight balls make you look ready to burst, filled with semen and potency. Low hangers look empty and exhausted, like they've been overused and are now weak and passive and less engorged.
During sex/masturbation, the balls get tight, and it can be pleasurable to rub them and the scrotal skin then. When they're loose and exhausted...not so much. Just as the erection is the ultimate stage of the penis in terms of phallic potency and symbolic masculine eroticism, tighter balls (as they are during intense sex) are the expression of that in the testicles, NOT low hangers. Except for fetishists.
Now, it's true, you don't always want the penis erect, and you don't always want the balls so tight. Being super-tight can make them look smaller if they withdraw too far up near the body. BUT, low-hangers are the testicular equivalent of a super loose, super empty, super exhausted flaccid penis, or maybe a gross impotent-looking exhausted semi-erection (I think semi-erections are the ugliest stage of the penis). And that's not aesthetically appealing.
No. Even when flaccid, you want the penis, though totally unerect and soft, to be still sort of swollen and full looking. As puffy as it can be without becoming elevated (because once you get elevated a bit...that's a semi and it's ugly). You dont want the wrinkly, exhausted look. Same thing with the testicles...you want a smooth, full, young healthy look. Same thing with the testicles. Loose folds of extra skin make it look like you have old-woman labia between your legs...and except for fetishists, that's ugly.
Now, like I said...they shouldnt be super-orgasm tight all the time. A tight, firm, round, crinkly armidillo sack is nice with an erection, and can feel good to touch...but with a flaccid penis, obviously, you want something a little looser and softer. Still, pretty tight however. Perhaps just loose enough so that you can start seeing the definition of the balls themselves and distinguish as seperate the curves of the two of them (because super tight makes looks like the scrotum is one big sphere, which is fine with an erection, but not flaccid).
And this is ideal for size in some ways too. Too tight and they can get pulled somewhat into the body even and look small. But too loose...and there is no engorging effect which can make them look smaller and empty too. Really loose low hanging balls are very distinct as balls,true...but they get none of the "cushioning" boost to the appearence of their size that comes from the puffiness of a somewhat tighter scrotum and its skin and fluids.
Also, low-hangers look bad in other ways. Ideally, the flaccid penis will rest relaxed and lazy ON the scrotum. The bottom side of the flaccid penis should, in most people's aesthetic ideal, rest heavily on the front curve of the scrotum. However with low-hangers, especially if you have a very tight ligament...the penis may seem elevated a little, even when fully flaccid, and sort of "hang out" with space between it and the front of the scrotum that makes it look like a pathetic little semi.
Similarily, higher, tighter balls (especially big ones) provide an excellent "seat" for the penis in creating "the bulge". Low hangers make no bulge. They dangle "between" your legs...but that doesnt create any contours out in front of your crotch. Balls higher and tigher ride foreward and in front, allowing them to push the flaccid penis foreward and the whole thing creates the volume need for the bulge. Low hangers, too often, are a lot of empty skin sac that dont take up too much space, and the balls themselves, all loose and slippery, spread out and maybe even just end up near your anus...which creates no "bulge".
I don't know what you think women/gays like in a scrotum, but most people outside the realm of fetish think low hangers are gross, or at least less aesthetically pleasing.
The nutsack gets really tight before orgasm, and it is a sign of great excitement, arousal, and sensuality.
And when you have an erection, a tighter scrotum is more aesthetically pleasing, the curves of the genitals flow together more smoothly.
And penis size is not really an issue when it comes to the testicles hanging. Yes, low hangers may expose a little more shaft on the bottom, but they add all sorts of gross dangling skin and wrinkles and "webbing" potentially. Only someone obsessed with incremental size differences would care.
And you don't measure along the bottom anyway. All the exposed bottom-shaft in the world wont make you look bigger because people judge that from the top-length, no matter how much some porn tries to create the illusion of "huge" penises by always showing them from the bottom up (and zoomed so that they compare deceptively with the face and rest of the body in the distance). A full-body profile side view of a man with his erection is really the only way to judge size accurately, especially in photos or videos. And you will notice such straightforward side-view displays of erections are rare in porn, as it tries to create it's illusions by making the size ambiguous and not providing good markers for objective comparison.
But low hangers are gross. They make the balls look...exhausted. The sack "melts" like that when it is hot or tired. Tight balls make you look ready to burst, filled with semen and potency. Low hangers look empty and exhausted, like they've been overused and are now weak and passive and less engorged.
During sex/masturbation, the balls get tight, and it can be pleasurable to rub them and the scrotal skin then. When they're loose and exhausted...not so much. Just as the erection is the ultimate stage of the penis in terms of phallic potency and symbolic masculine eroticism, tighter balls (as they are during intense sex) are the expression of that in the testicles, NOT low hangers. Except for fetishists.
Now, it's true, you don't always want the penis erect, and you don't always want the balls so tight. Being super-tight can make them look smaller if they withdraw too far up near the body. BUT, low-hangers are the testicular equivalent of a super loose, super empty, super exhausted flaccid penis, or maybe a gross impotent-looking exhausted semi-erection (I think semi-erections are the ugliest stage of the penis). And that's not aesthetically appealing.
No. Even when flaccid, you want the penis, though totally unerect and soft, to be still sort of swollen and full looking. As puffy as it can be without becoming elevated (because once you get elevated a bit...that's a semi and it's ugly). You dont want the wrinkly, exhausted look. Same thing with the testicles...you want a smooth, full, young healthy look. Same thing with the testicles. Loose folds of extra skin make it look like you have old-woman labia between your legs...and except for fetishists, that's ugly.
Now, like I said...they shouldnt be super-orgasm tight all the time. A tight, firm, round, crinkly armidillo sack is nice with an erection, and can feel good to touch...but with a flaccid penis, obviously, you want something a little looser and softer. Still, pretty tight however. Perhaps just loose enough so that you can start seeing the definition of the balls themselves and distinguish as seperate the curves of the two of them (because super tight makes looks like the scrotum is one big sphere, which is fine with an erection, but not flaccid).
And this is ideal for size in some ways too. Too tight and they can get pulled somewhat into the body even and look small. But too loose...and there is no engorging effect which can make them look smaller and empty too. Really loose low hanging balls are very distinct as balls,true...but they get none of the "cushioning" boost to the appearence of their size that comes from the puffiness of a somewhat tighter scrotum and its skin and fluids.
Also, low-hangers look bad in other ways. Ideally, the flaccid penis will rest relaxed and lazy ON the scrotum. The bottom side of the flaccid penis should, in most people's aesthetic ideal, rest heavily on the front curve of the scrotum. However with low-hangers, especially if you have a very tight ligament...the penis may seem elevated a little, even when fully flaccid, and sort of "hang out" with space between it and the front of the scrotum that makes it look like a pathetic little semi.
Similarily, higher, tighter balls (especially big ones) provide an excellent "seat" for the penis in creating "the bulge". Low hangers make no bulge. They dangle "between" your legs...but that doesnt create any contours out in front of your crotch. Balls higher and tigher ride foreward and in front, allowing them to push the flaccid penis foreward and the whole thing creates the volume need for the bulge. Low hangers, too often, are a lot of empty skin sac that dont take up too much space, and the balls themselves, all loose and slippery, spread out and maybe even just end up near your anus...which creates no "bulge".
Similar threads
