U ever wonder what sex looks like from inside a vagina?

[Putzo]

I downloaded this video. It looks so weird

I did too, seriously disappointing. That last cum shot doesnt look real at all, I've never seen sperm looking like that. it looks more like dirty water than cum to me......

 

[Bariton]

Not from the inside, but here's a picture of a couple during intercourse in a MRI-scanner:
Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal.
Good for an "Ig Nobel Prize".

 

[D.G.]

Wow! Erections on terrestrial TV. Whatever next?

I just watched the Channel 5 programme and it was quite interesting and strange at the same time, watching the penis going in an out of the vagina, as shot from inside!

Looks like this could be a good series!

 

[Latiszari]

I do....could be kinda hot...like they could place a small camera near the cervix and record all the action

Hmmm, i am sincere: being me a romantic kind of people, i don't find this so intriguing. I don't think about it as something of disgusting, but honestly i may live well whitout know and see this.:tongue:

 

[D.G.]

I have episode 2 downloading at the moment. I'll post here when I've watched it.

 

[OPPinSLC]

I just found this link Everything you ever wanted to know about the missionary position - Videos @ m90.org

Maybe that BBC thing people are posting.
Not my cup of tea, however, I like a little mystry to life.

 

[D.G.]

OK, just watched episode 2.

This week they were discussing the doggy style position with the cock cam and the internal camera.

Again, some interesting footage of how the penis and vagina move during intercourse. I never knew how much the cervix end of the vagina 'tented' during arousal. Makes me wonder how I'll ever fill it with my cock! I'll post some caps later if anyone's interested.

Other things that they discussed were: some penis enlargement products, stimulating the clitoris and a man who had to have his penis stitched back on.

 

[D.G.]

OK, these caps are from episode 1, which featured the missionary position. I have some more to come from episode 2, which was doggy style if anyone is interested.

 

[uberzig08]

DG that is amazing pic. Wow! Modern science is amazing.

 

[Jaime]

Oh My!

 

[jordanj]

Eww. I promise you that I'm no prude but really, in such horrifically close-up detail as that? Reminds me of those autopsy things that Channel 4 broadcast over the last couple of years.

 

[Paul Vincent]

Is that penis soft or just small when it enters? It looks under duress...I didnt think the vagina could bend a penis, I know it cant bend mine...

Cock of Steel.

Downloading the first episode now

Torrentspy.com - The Largest Bit Torrent Search Engine

If you want to too ^

Or maybe thats his glans and I cant see the urethra...weird.

 

[BlueWolf]

Downloading the first episode now
Torrentspy.com - The Largest Bit Torrent Search Engine

Thanks for the link Paul!

 

[284352]

anybody know if the video is still available?

 

[_chrizzian_]

XTube Videos

 

[D_Coyne Toss]

Cool!!! The guy in the pics doesn't seem that hung, however.

 

[pronatalist]

I wouldn't have minded seeing that in Biology, just so long as presented in a moral pronatalist setting.​

Is this really so new?

I remember being shown something like this in high school biology. The view was from inside the vagina showing the head of the penis as it intruded and subsequently spit up. I distinctly remember a classmate crying out, "Is nothing sacred?!!".

Of course it's "new" because it's curiously interesting, "scientific," and of course, an interest aspect of "animal biology" to see the act of the already "huge" human population growing further.

Should it be a "private" matter not to be shown in school? Maybe, but then, what people do in the privacy of their bedrooms swells human populations and makes us to populate the planet more densely. So it's also a very public matter, as the billions of penises in the world continues to grow. It has profound effects upon the world, most of which are actually positive, not negative. Not that "education" must always take some controversal position, and if it does of course any Sex Ed should favor the human race to go on growing naturally, merely to understand better the truth about why it should, and how to better ACCOMODATE our growth, if they can even get into all that. Anyway, I suggest the very public matter as a partial rationale as to why the public may enjoy watching humans reproduce, in a moral "educational" fashion, but of course. Just because human population may practically be nearly impossible to "control," doesn't at all imply that we should make any effort to. Until very recently, human population was accepted as just a "given," something to welcome and design around. Population is what it is.

Is nothing sacred? Yeah, humans like their privacy for sex. And yet, with so many people all around the planet so frequently "doing it," people may see other people copulating in some settings, walking in on their parents, or small cramped housing in developing countries, or during a family camping trip, or on that too small RV—many still don't have a separate "bedroom." So if people are probably seeing other people have sex in some setting, they might as well see the curious sight of the semen flowing from the penis into the vagina from within. To see the actual flow of human life and population growth, is quite a beautiful curious wonder. Yeah, it may help awaken or stir powerful reproductive urges for more people to have more babies, but that's generally a "good" thing to encourage anyway.

And it hardly seems out of context for a "biology" class. It is natural biology after all. I recall my biology class, all we had is those reproductive system drawings in our textbook, and a teacher who talked about sex somewhat, as if it was just a natural part of biology. No immoral explicit Sex Ed beyond what would reasonably be said in a Biology class.

I should add the observation that we had in some discussion as to the immoral trends in pushing Sex Ed, that co-ed classes may serve to break down healthy modesty between the sexes, a bad trend to promote that could lead to premarital sex. So part of the remedy there is to consider whether males and females should be separated for any "Sex Ed" class, or whether Sex Ed or a certain fashion should even be allowed. But then, separating the sexes may be a bit excessive, if it is after all, only a Biology class, and even more so, if at the college level? No doubt many young women also wouldn't mind seeing a penis "spit up" into a vagina. Would they think twice before engaging in sex and the baby fluid going into their bodies, or would that just make them want to do sex more?

Because it is sacred, is why any means of "birth control" should be discouraged, so as to not interfere with the natural flow of human life. I hardly think that "studying" the flow is near so bad, as hindering it.

Anyway, I'm not so sure that merely showing the "educational" aspect of how humans reproduce, violates the sacred, so long as the flow of human life is respected and natural and not interfered with, unless of course necessary to help it along with various infertility issues. In other words, I would vehemently object to the "advertising" of shoddy contraceptive use, not so much the "intimate" encounter, if male and female are husband and wife, and reproducing naturally and traditionally. No "kinky" porno garbage.

And parents should have their appropriate option to voice input or opt their children out of such things.

 

[pronatalist]

Are you sure you aren't a prude?​

Eww. I promise you that I'm no prude but really, in such horrifically close-up detail as that? Reminds me of those autopsy things that Channel 4 broadcast over the last couple of years.

Well it wouldn't be so curiously interesting, if not close-up.

What do you want? "Suggestive sex" like in the soap operas? A couple lying in bed together, about to do it, or already having done the deed? Wouldn't that then be more like trashy porn or dirty romance novels, and not so much "educational" then?

That's simply a "hazard" of such a visual medium as TV.

BTW, I'm no fan of autopsies, but surely those would have to be "close-up" as well?

And it's hardly a trashy porn "sex" channel, if it's "educational," "medical," or "biology." I don't see where natural human "biology" would be necessarily excluded.

 

[EboniGoddess]

Didn't I just create a forum with the video like a week ago? Are u refering to that?

 

[HyperHulk]

I do....could be kinda hot...like they could place a small camera near the cervix and record all the action

No, I've never wondered about that.