Is it just me or does it seem like a lot of big dicks are uncut? Obviously, there a lot of circumcised large men too, but I feel like there are more uncut big ones, and that the truly super huge ones are almost always uncut.
Thoughts?
Yes, they (the uncuts) tend to be 3 to 4 times longer and twice as thick as those which have been needlessly, senselessly stripped of their protective skin. Some say it's because they are so embarrassed by their nudity having had their cloak removed. Others say it's because the uncircumcised penis gets to live a life of luxury knowing it won't be subjected to brambles and thorns when cavorting naked through the woods. Still others indicate that it's because some of the lucious juices of a woman become trapped under the skin after sex, providing growth enhancing nutrients. Yet others, say it's because the penis is in a protective sheath during masturbation, so it doesn't get worn raw and therefore can concentrate on growing to full productive size instead of having to heal from the abrasions suffered at the merciless hands of a horndog teen who doesn't have skin.
The truth of the matter is that, as another said, there are more uncuts in the world so you're more likely to see more big uncuts. In my personal journies I have seen tiny cuts and big cuts, and the same with the uncuts. Some of each are thick, some of each are thin, some of each are short and some of each are long. Some are attached to loggers and some are attached to actors, others attached to butchers and a lot are attached to bakers.
A penis which is thick or a penis which is thin, to slash off it's skin, now there's a mighty sin. That said, I've not seen any actual correlation between the foreskin and size.
