Do you mean "uncut" as in "not circumcised"? If yes, then I would say no, there is no king. Having experienced both states, I'd say that it's perfectly fine either way, unless there is a medical need for circumcision. Both the intactivists and the pro-circumcision movement are going to great lengths spreading false facts with the only effect of discriminating one group or the other. I oppose routine infant circumcision, but elective adult circumcision is a perfectly normal and healthy procedure that is getting way too much attention for all the wrong reasons.