Webcam hunk with HUGE tighty-whitey bulge & massive dick

[19274]

Hi, can anyone provide more details, or videos of this hunk, as he's truely beautiful- toned, broad, tall, handsome & hung with an amazing cock.

I think he goes by a few different names- Tyler, Barnyard_stud and Horse_hung_stud.

He has videos on the following website but haven't joined as of yet

horse hung stud : WorldGroups

Share your thoughts/info on this HUNK x

 

[Adomfg]

Nice, but I think this has been posted in the wrong section

 

[NickJ21]

very sexy guy indeed, any streaming websites with his content?

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Hi, can anyone provide more details, or videos of this hunk, as he's truely beautiful- toned, broad, tall, handsome & hung with an amazing cock.

I think he goes by a few different names- Tyler, Barnyard_stud and Horse_hung_stud.

He has videos on the following website but haven't joined as of yet

horse hung stud : WorldGroups

Share your thoughts/info on this HUNK x

No thought, but I KNOW this is in the wrong section.

Nice, but I think this has been posted in the wrong section

Yup.

 

[CardiffDillon]

The labels of 'Gay' or 'Straight' are completely irrelevant on a site that's all about looking at and talking about big cocks. It would be far less confusing if these sections were renamed 'Big Dicked Men' and 'Big Dicked Men with Women'

 

[19274]

The labels of 'Gay' or 'Straight' are completely irrelevant on a site that's all about looking at and talking about big cocks. It would be far less confusing if these sections were renamed 'Big Dicked Men' and 'Big Dicked Men with Women'

Well said, I find it confusing, so I posted this in both sections... The performer identifies himself as being straight, therefore it makes sense to put it into the straight section. However he performs solely by himself, and no other men or women, therefore can't it also fit into the 'gay' section so that gay guys can see the post too??

Whatever section it's meant to be in, it'd be great to see more x

 

[blkbro510]

It seems that even though the guy is straight and he's alone with his big dick it GAY. If its a scene of the movie but the guys are straight but since he's nude with his dick out, it needs to be in the gay section.


Really folks if you are really want women you go to xvideos and porno tubes but the REAL focus on this site is LARGE PENIS.

The labels of 'Gay' or 'Straight' are completely irrelevant on a site that's all about looking at and talking about big cocks. It would be far less confusing if these sections were renamed 'Big Dicked Men' and 'Big Dicked Men with Women'

 

[kansan]

Remember back when they split the forum into two sections? There were some gay guys that were really outraged by it....

And even now, gays guys feel compelled to post images that would really only be of interest to gays in the straight section.

I think that it gives some sort of thrill to them. Odd behavior.
I am not offended by the gay stuff. Just have no interest in seeing it.

 

[Adomfg]

Would love to see that massive cock stretching out a nice tight pussy though

 

[iceman888888]

any B/G vids of him?

 

[ellislarge]

truth be told they just need a solo section, because solo content can't be considered gay if it can't be considered straight. it just depends on what sex is looking at it.

i personally don't think women who want to see a naked man solo should have to go digging through the gay section. nor do i think that guys should have to dig through the gay section to see a woman getting off alone, but that type of content isn't any more straight, nor does it belong in the straight section any more than a man who's alone.

 

[B_Hung Jon]

Well said, I find it confusing, so I posted this in both sections... The performer identifies himself as being straight, therefore it makes sense to put it into the straight section. However he performs solely by himself, and no other men or women, therefore can't it also fit into the 'gay' section so that gay guys can see the post too??

Whatever section it's meant to be in, it'd be great to see more x

This makes sense to me.

 

[B_Bjen2848]

truth be told they just need a solo section, because solo content can't be considered gay if it can't be considered straight. it just depends on what sex is looking at it.

i personally don't think women who want to see a naked man solo should have to go digging through the gay section. nor do i think that guys should have to dig through the gay section to see a woman getting off alone, but that type of content isn't any more straight, nor does it belong in the straight section any more than a man who's alone.

i think they also need a cat section, because cat content can't be considered a fish if it can't be considered a baboon. it just depends on what discovery channel you're watching and your service provider (unless, of course, the cat identifies itself as a dolphin)

i personally don't think clownfish who want to see a partially clothed playstation controller should be digging around my homework from sophomore year of highschool just to see a butt cheek. nor do i think what i am typing makes any sense.

all in all, i think this is gay (unless the guy in the picture identifies himself as barack obama.. and if that were the case, i would be exponentially confused)