1
13788
Guest
NineInchCock_160IQ:
Indeed there have been studies. None very scientific or statistically significant. The most exhaustive study to date that I'm aware of is still the Kinsey study, which found erect length of whites to be 0.1" less than that of blacks. In flaccid length blacks were 0.3" longer on average. I wouldn't even really go on this survey though since there were a very small number of black respondents compared to whites. I have seen other surveys where the difference between asian/white/black are marked by differences up to one inch, but like I said, the results are not often what I would call scientifically or statistically significant. Taken altogther, since almost all of these surveys do agree, I'd say that it is safe to assume that, on average, white males are better endowed than Chinese/Vietnamese/Japanese/Thai/etc males (since Asian encompasses too many people and Oriental has somehow become a bad word), and that, on average, black males are better endowed than white males. But the differences between race seem to often be exaggerated, probably in much the same way the correlation between height or shoe size and cock size is so often exaggerated. There may be a seed of truth there but it is blown out of proportion and there are also always individual cases that disprove the rule. Plenty of white guys and a few asians on this board who are bigger than the 6.5" avg you listed for blacks.
Originally posted by ziggity@Jan 29 2005, 06:22 PM
9in, there have been studies. asian men are averaged around 4.5 to 5.5 in length, caucasians obviously average around 6", but black men are averaged 6.5+ with a noticeable ubiquitous difference in being thicker.
[post=278631]Quoted post[/post]
Indeed there have been studies. None very scientific or statistically significant. The most exhaustive study to date that I'm aware of is still the Kinsey study, which found erect length of whites to be 0.1" less than that of blacks. In flaccid length blacks were 0.3" longer on average. I wouldn't even really go on this survey though since there were a very small number of black respondents compared to whites. I have seen other surveys where the difference between asian/white/black are marked by differences up to one inch, but like I said, the results are not often what I would call scientifically or statistically significant. Taken altogther, since almost all of these surveys do agree, I'd say that it is safe to assume that, on average, white males are better endowed than Chinese/Vietnamese/Japanese/Thai/etc males (since Asian encompasses too many people and Oriental has somehow become a bad word), and that, on average, black males are better endowed than white males. But the differences between race seem to often be exaggerated, probably in much the same way the correlation between height or shoe size and cock size is so often exaggerated. There may be a seed of truth there but it is blown out of proportion and there are also always individual cases that disprove the rule. Plenty of white guys and a few asians on this board who are bigger than the 6.5" avg you listed for blacks.