I'm afro-brasilian, been in the states since I was 3. I am not circumcised because it is not given in Brasil unless it is necessary or requested electively. A friend thinks that a lot of guys are into me just because i'm uncut. So I have been asking friends randomly what they prefer and they mostly say uncut guys. Why? It doesn't operate differently than a cut cock. I don't get the obsession.
Why are Gay Men seemingly obsessed with uncut cock?
- Thread starter spaox
- Start date
Well, actually it does operate slightly differently than a cut cock. But I'd be into you because you're Afro-Brasilian, not because you're uncut.
invisibleman
Loved Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Posts
- 9,816
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 513
- Points
- 303
- Location
- North Carolina
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I think that they like you because you are Brazilian and that you are uncut. The combo makes for some alluring fantasies. I love those Kristen Bjorn films with those hot Brazilian guys in there. Whoo!!!:smile:
I would be soooo into you because of your descent and you being uncut. I spend a lot of times browsing in pages with well hung uncut Brazilians. I love an uncut cock because of the fun I have with a long foreskin.
What´s your size anyways? just curious, lol!
What´s your size anyways? just curious, lol!
Bryan_Lyte2
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Posts
- 1,595
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 23
- Points
- 183
- Age
- 39
- Location
- CA, between Rosamond, and Palmdale
- Sexuality
- Unsure
- Gender
- Male
If you mean in the U.S. the major religious influence calls for it making it "supposedly" rare, thus desirable. I'm like you. I could care less cut or not In a condom they have a smilar* feel. ouyside is a completly different story, but I've never ventured to find out.
Assuming one barebacks (less trouble, more consiquence) uncut is supposedly has less friction. Say what you will but I get enough rejection for being me that I've heard all the stories, myths, and excuses.
Assuming one barebacks (less trouble, more consiquence) uncut is supposedly has less friction. Say what you will but I get enough rejection for being me that I've heard all the stories, myths, and excuses.
"People are stupid and shallow that way"
spaox : Uncut is a little different. Among anumber of other things, it's a smoother ride for whoever you are nailing - less friction as bryan said - but that goes for with a condom too. The condom poses it's own set of issues for the uncut guys. Ultimately though, there is not really big difference.
It does work either way.
Bryan: Only a small percent of circumcised men (who are the majority in the US) were circumcised for religious reasons. I don't understand what you were talking about. Circumcision is common in America, while religious circumcision in America is compartively rare.
It does work either way.
Bryan: Only a small percent of circumcised men (who are the majority in the US) were circumcised for religious reasons. I don't understand what you were talking about. Circumcision is common in America, while religious circumcision in America is compartively rare.
I think that uncut cocks are fewer in this country than cut cocks. So, I think part of this is fantasizing over what you don't have yourself. It's something I wanted to try because I'm cut (American Jew). So once I did it with a guy with an uncut cock, I felt that I like all cocks both cut and uncut and for different reasons.
As an aside, the latest studies are showing that circumcised men are less at risk for contracting HIV and other STDs. Also women who have sex with uncut men have a higher rate of cervical cancer. There are cancers of the foreskin that get eliminated when a penis is circumsized.
For me the number one reason I would get a boy circumsized is for the spiritual reasons outlined by Jewish Law. I would want my sons to fully partipate in the Covenant and the Community. It's a practice that sets our people apart. The lack of a foreskin reminds us every time we look at our penises or play with them, we are a member of something larger than ourselves. This is a very personal decision for each family. These are my thoughts on this subject.
As an aside, the latest studies are showing that circumcised men are less at risk for contracting HIV and other STDs. Also women who have sex with uncut men have a higher rate of cervical cancer. There are cancers of the foreskin that get eliminated when a penis is circumsized.
For me the number one reason I would get a boy circumsized is for the spiritual reasons outlined by Jewish Law. I would want my sons to fully partipate in the Covenant and the Community. It's a practice that sets our people apart. The lack of a foreskin reminds us every time we look at our penises or play with them, we are a member of something larger than ourselves. This is a very personal decision for each family. These are my thoughts on this subject.
The problem I have is with people who are completely obsessed with uncut cocks. I was talking to someone online a while back and he was just COMPLETELY repulsed that my cock was cut. The problem is that I didn't really have a choice in the matter.
I think you are DEFINATELY onto something here. Most women are satisfied with their partner's penis cut vs uncut or long vs. short.
Maybe Im biased coz Im uncut too, but I definitely think cut and uncut cocks operate sooooooo differently, you can do so much more with a uncut penis, play with the foreskin etc. Also wanking a uncut cock is different as the skin moves so makes it a lot easier, and a cut cock, especially a tight one, it is hard to wank without lube, so rather than moving the foreskin up and down, is more like 'rubbing' it. A uncut penis usually still have the frenum attached which is the best bit ever for stimulation, and uncut's head is so much smoother and sensitive, most cut penises doesn't have the frenun anymore, and also the head dries up like a prune, making it 'old' looking.
Also I don't really like scars, I get squeamish about it, and to seeing a cut cock, to me its like seeing a scared penis, its really not too appealing to me. I'm glad I lived in a country where most people don't get it cut, so its very rare that I come across with someone with a cut one :biggrin1:
dcwrestlefan
Sexy Member
there is no preference for this among the gay guys i know; the title of the topic is not correct imho. personal preference is cut actually, but it's not a strong preference. most guys i have been with are "sliced", and am cool with that. EVERYONE i saw in the shower in hs and college and at the gym are circ, but this is the usa.
Bbucko
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Posts
- 7,232
- Media
- 8
- Likes
- 326
- Points
- 208
- Location
- Sunny SoFla
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Obsessed? Speaking strictly for myself, I have a preference for foreskin on the dicks I suck. It makes the entire exercise more interesting and it excites me tremendously.
I remember the first uncut dick I ever saw in high school PE. It belonged to a muscular Latino named Angel, on whom I had a little unrequited crush. Seeing his uncut dick between his legs just cemented the whole deal for me.
When I lived in France it was like an all-you-can eat buffet 24/7. I was in heaven.
But getting back to the original question: it's been my experience after 30 years having sex with other men that the vast majority is more fixated on size than whether or not said penis is intact, and that if there is a majority preference in the US it's for cut, not uncut cock. In all my experience, I've only met one guy who rejected me for being cut, but he was an anti-American bigot with much bigger issues anyway.
I remember the first uncut dick I ever saw in high school PE. It belonged to a muscular Latino named Angel, on whom I had a little unrequited crush. Seeing his uncut dick between his legs just cemented the whole deal for me.
When I lived in France it was like an all-you-can eat buffet 24/7. I was in heaven.
But getting back to the original question: it's been my experience after 30 years having sex with other men that the vast majority is more fixated on size than whether or not said penis is intact, and that if there is a majority preference in the US it's for cut, not uncut cock. In all my experience, I've only met one guy who rejected me for being cut, but he was an anti-American bigot with much bigger issues anyway.
spaox, many Americans are under the impression that Brazilians are a sensual, uninhibited people who are much more open minded about sex, including sex between men. Many Americans find Brazilians exotic. However, since you've been in the states since you were a child, these may not be factors in your case.
With regards to uncut cocks, most American men are circumcised and many have never seen or felt an uncut penis. To most Americans, uncut cocks are "normal" and uncut ones look weird. (Kenyth's perspective makes more sense: uncut cocks are normal, cut ones are scarred.) Many American men and women believe that uncircumcised penises are dirty and that they look gross. Up until recently, I think many gay American men had similar attitudes. I've heard of men, both straight and gay, getting cirumcised as adults because of the negative attitudes towards being uncut.
Over the past couple of decades, gay Americans has been moving towards a more foreskin-positive attitude, and some have even developed a preference for uncut cock. For some, this preference is based on an objection to needless body modification (some would say "mutilation"), particularly when it is performed on infants who cannot give informed consent. For others, it's based on actually experiencing an uncut cock and deciding that having a foreskin really is better. For some cut guys, it's just fun to play with something different than what you've got. For me, it's all of the above.
Why are attitudes changing? It may have begun when gay porn like Bel Ami and Kristen Bjorn began featuring uncut models, as Matthew and invisibleman mentioned. The first uncut dicks I saw were in Bel Ami photo shoots, and I was fascinated. I thought they were really gorgeous, and for the first time I began to wonder what it was like to have a foreskin and to consider what I might be missing.
Also, in general, I think gay men are more open-minded than the general population, especially with regards to matters of sex and sexuality. Obviously we're more likely than straight guys to think about the variety of dicks that are out there and to be curious about dicks that are different from our own.
spaox, you say that uncut cocks don't operate differently from cut ones. Actually, they do function quite a bit differently. Kenyth does a good job describing the differences. As he pointed out, when masturbating, cut guys rub skin on the penis, creating stimulation through friction. The skin doesn't slide much, if at all. Unfortunately, friction can also cause irritation, often requiring the use of messy lubes. (I hate having to use lube. It's expensive and no lube is perfect. The ones that give the best slide tend to dry out the fastest. The ones that last long have a less sensual texture, etc. When you run out you try lotion or even vegetable oil as a substitute, but they absorb too quickly.) Friction on the penis and the need for lube can also be problems during vaginal or anal intercourse.
With regards to uncut cocks, most American men are circumcised and many have never seen or felt an uncut penis. To most Americans, uncut cocks are "normal" and uncut ones look weird. (Kenyth's perspective makes more sense: uncut cocks are normal, cut ones are scarred.) Many American men and women believe that uncircumcised penises are dirty and that they look gross. Up until recently, I think many gay American men had similar attitudes. I've heard of men, both straight and gay, getting cirumcised as adults because of the negative attitudes towards being uncut.
Over the past couple of decades, gay Americans has been moving towards a more foreskin-positive attitude, and some have even developed a preference for uncut cock. For some, this preference is based on an objection to needless body modification (some would say "mutilation"), particularly when it is performed on infants who cannot give informed consent. For others, it's based on actually experiencing an uncut cock and deciding that having a foreskin really is better. For some cut guys, it's just fun to play with something different than what you've got. For me, it's all of the above.
Why are attitudes changing? It may have begun when gay porn like Bel Ami and Kristen Bjorn began featuring uncut models, as Matthew and invisibleman mentioned. The first uncut dicks I saw were in Bel Ami photo shoots, and I was fascinated. I thought they were really gorgeous, and for the first time I began to wonder what it was like to have a foreskin and to consider what I might be missing.
Also, in general, I think gay men are more open-minded than the general population, especially with regards to matters of sex and sexuality. Obviously we're more likely than straight guys to think about the variety of dicks that are out there and to be curious about dicks that are different from our own.
spaox, you say that uncut cocks don't operate differently from cut ones. Actually, they do function quite a bit differently. Kenyth does a good job describing the differences. As he pointed out, when masturbating, cut guys rub skin on the penis, creating stimulation through friction. The skin doesn't slide much, if at all. Unfortunately, friction can also cause irritation, often requiring the use of messy lubes. (I hate having to use lube. It's expensive and no lube is perfect. The ones that give the best slide tend to dry out the fastest. The ones that last long have a less sensual texture, etc. When you run out you try lotion or even vegetable oil as a substitute, but they absorb too quickly.) Friction on the penis and the need for lube can also be problems during vaginal or anal intercourse.
There are many factors to a woman's satisfaction other than her partner's penis size or circumcision status, including her feelings towards her partner, how well he communicates, how romantic he is, how responsive and attentive he is, how good his technique is, how attractive he is, etc.
It's widely recognized that many women are not sexually satisfied and many have difficulty achieving orgasm. Many women don't look forward to sex (and may even avoid it), and only do it to please their partners (who probably aren't satifsfied, either, because they can tell she's not enjoying it, and because they aren't getting as much sex as they want). This is a big problem in hetero relationships and one of the reasons those relationships fail.
There are lots of theories about why this is so, many of which focus on things like poor communication between partners, men's insensitivity and lack of attention to the woman's needs, and poor technique. All of which are probably true to varying degrees.
Women's satisfaction with regards to their partner's circumcisions status is difficult to assess. I doubt that many American women have had enough uncut partners (if any) to have formed an opinion about which is more satisfying. Most women I know base their preference on aesthetics.
Kristen O'Hara has published a theory that intercourse can be uncomfortable for women if the man is circumcised. I doubt that this possibility even occurs to most people. Wouldn't it be interesting if this turned out to be the "real" problem so many hetero couples face? Of course, much more research needs to be done.
Male Circumcision and Sexual Enjoyment of the Female Partner
Circumcision - Sex Effects of Male Circumcision
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Posts
- 6,059
- Media
- 9,229
- Likes
- 280,826
- Points
- 618
- Location
- Maryland, United States of America
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I have been cut for approximately 3/4 of the time I was uncut! Other than the fact that my cock stays cleaner cut and looked two inches longer uncut, there has been absolutely no difference in the way my cock has been accepted by others or for that matter in the basic way it functions. One thing I will admit is that my cock needs more lube cut than it did when uncut!
