Women: the Price for Watching Porn, is Rape, say Feminists.

[Gecko4lif]

"It isn't rape if I consent" :biggrin1:

No!!! You cant consent! You have stolen all my maculine dominating rapey power.

I am now rendered helpless

 

[dolfette]

No!!! You cant consent! You have stolen all my maculine dominating rapey power.

I am now rendered helpless

that made me snort in a most unladylike way.

 

[Drifterwood]

I am now rendered impotent

Dude, you always were.

 

[MickeyLee]

No!!! You cant consent! You have stolen all my maculine dominating rapey power.

I am now rendered helpless

rapey power :biggrin:

 

[Drifterwood]

rapey power :biggrin:

Is this two way?

 

[MickeyLee]

*blink* two way rapey power? *sees your and raising you a :shrug:*

wonder rapey twins power activate?

 

[Drifterwood]

*blink* two way rapey power? *sees your and raising you a :shrug:*

wonder rapey twins power activate?

Surely my super male rapey power play will win the day?

 

[B_hunghealinglover]

I have many an inappropriate response to make to that dear Drifter, but I shall settle for "It isn't rape if I consent" :biggrin1:

If certain feminists are to be believed, you are so inherently powerless as a woman within our society, so much a victim of your gender, that you are utterly unable to give consent, even if you think you have.


"Men's sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can 'reach WITHIN women to ****/construct us from the inside out.' Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women's own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced."- Judith Levine

 

[MickeyLee]

ya really wanna play misandry/misogyny round robin?


*flicks the great LPSG smite option*
all better now :smile:

 

[Drifterwood]

I have been the object of an experiment in these these things, oh great healing hung juan. I am getting the distinct feeling that healing ain't really your thang.

 

[B_hunghealinglover]

ya really wanna play misandry/misogyny round robin?

That sounds like a definition of a feminist chasing his/her own tail!

The biggest misandrists AND misogynists are feminists themselves. They see men as all powerful demons, and women as their helpless, almost retarded victims.

(okay Dolfette - SOME feminists :wink

 

[Drifterwood]

That sounds like a definition of a feminist chasing his/her own tail!

The biggest misandrists AND misogynists are feminists themselves. The see men as all powerful demons, and women as their helpless, almost retarded victims.

(okay Dolfette - SOME feminists :wink

OK - I admit I am tired and the wrong end of an 18 hour day, but let me be the one to lay their membership on the line, because this guy is a classic avoid other men operator.

You are a twat. Fuck off.

Good night.

Sorry if I got it wrong.

 

[Kotchanski]

If certain feminists are to be believed, you are so inherently powerless as a woman within our society, so much a victim of your gender, that you are utterly unable to give consent, even if you think you have.


"Men's sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can 'reach WITHIN women to ****/construct us from the inside out.' Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women's own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced."- Judith Levine

So at this point, you've opted to stoop to direct attempts to incite?

Not content with posing inflammatory content disguised as a genuine question, and ignoring reasoned explanations of others in an attempt to get some sexist point of view across, you now seek to uphold the very thing I've spoken out against, in the hopes that I'll either back off and shut the fuck up, or agree with your opinion.

What a shame I have an IQ above that of a rock, else it may have worked and I'd have been forced to choose between telling you what I think and getting myself banned, or becoming an outcast within decent female society for backing down and agreeing with such stupidity.

 

[B_hunghealinglover]

So at this point, you've opted to stoop to direct attempts to incite?

Not content with posing inflammatory content disguised as a genuine question, and ignoring reasoned explanations of others in an attempt to get some sexist point of view across, you now seek to uphold the very thing I've spoken out against, in the hopes that I'll either back off and shut the fuck up, or agree with your opinion.

What a shame I have an IQ above that of a rock, else it may have worked and I'd have been forced to choose between telling you what I think and getting myself banned, or becoming an outcast within decent female society for backing down and agreeing with such stupidity.

My intention was not to incite at all.

This all stemmed from the incorrect assertion that the feminist notion that 'all sex is rape' and 'all men are rapists' was a misquote.

"all sex is rape" is a misquote.

It's not a misquote. The literature is out there, and can be seen.

My point of view is not sexist. I have made no sexist generalisations. That's somewhat slanderous of you, and I'm offended.

 

[Kotchanski]

My intention was not to incite at all.

This all stemmed from the incorrect assertion that the feminist notion that 'all sex is rape' and 'all men are rapists' was a misquote. It's not. The literature is out there, and can be seen.

My point of view is not sexist. I have made no sexist generalisations. That's somewhat slanderous of you, and I'm offended.

I'm offended by pretty much everything you have to say, so if my comments to you have only offended you the once, I can life with that.

Now try playing a different game with those who aren't able to read correctly. I'll even help you by pointing out the issues with your content (I'll PM you something too, just so you know where I'm coming from!)

1. You enter a thread and essentially tell the women objecting to the content of said thread that they are being overemotional, that men would never behave like they are, and that if we're not taking all measures to protect ourselves from rape, we're asking for it.

2. When you don't like the replies from that, you start a thread of your own which you believe justifies your previous content by showing what you consider to be "one of our own" holding similarly vile opinions. At least once attempting to bolster your validity using her professional status.

3. When all this still fails, you attempt to back myself into a corner of either categorically denying any affiliation for feminism and a desire to to support anything potentially seen as feminist in nature so that I may continue to hold my own opinion, or to recant all opinions I've stated and agree with your opinion to maintain my feminist status (as applied by yourself, not I)

 

[dolfette]

My intention was not to incite at all.

This all stemmed from the incorrect assertion that the feminist notion that 'all sex is rape' and 'all men are rapists' was a misquote. It's not. The literature is out there, and can be seen.

My point of view is not sexist. I have made no sexist generalisations. That's somewhat slanderous of you, and I'm offended.

here's the thing...
you joined this site yesterday, yes?
a site about sex & dicks & such, yes?
yet every one of your 13 posts is in womens issues, picking fights with feminism. every single post. the only topic you've responded to and the only thread you'e created.

offended?
if it looks like a troll and smells like a troll...

 

[B_hunghealinglover]

if we're not taking all measures to protect ourselves from rape, we're asking for it.

I never, ever, said that.

 

[Kotchanski]

I never, ever, said that.

Your position makes the implication clear.

 

[B_hunghealinglover]

here's the thing...
you joined this site yesterday, yes?
a site about sex & dicks & such, yes?

I recently joined the website, but prior to that had been reading posts here as a non-member for some time.

yet every one of your 13 posts is in womens issues, picking fights with feminism. every single post. the only topic you've responded to and the only thread you'e created.

I posted in a topical thread, and continued to follow the discussion in a calm and measured manner, without any intention of inciting an angered response from anyone.

I posted this thread, because I considered it a related and equally interesting subject. As I said before, I actually FOUND this article through researching matters related to the previous thread.

offended?
if it looks like a troll and smells like a troll...

I am not a troll. I resent the accusation.

 

[B_hunghealinglover]

Your position makes the implication clear.

Then you have completley misunderstood me.