Although most people probably prefer an uncut cock, I'm happy that mine is cut. I don't think I could handle excess skin on my dick—but then again that's just my opinion.
Since the head of an uncut cock is extra sensitive, doesn't that contribute to premature ejaculation? Because I'm cut, the head of my cock is less sensitive and I can continue a fuck for a longer time before I cum.
^I am uncut and have not had any premature ejac issues. I think most of my partners would kill me if i lasted any longer. I can lasts hours on end and not cum. I have delayed ejaculation. Sometimes I go en entire 2 day session (obviously not fucking two days straight through! lol) and don't cum.
I think like anything it is more the individual quirk of the body in such cases. My current guy is cut and I can get him off in 2 minutes by deep throating and screaming/humming on his cock as it works shallow (just past soft pallate) to add vibration to it. He has tried that on me, and though it will get me off it still takes at minimum 30 minutes or more.
Having a whole intact penis does not cause premature ejaculation or any other dysfunction. Common sense should make you to know that cutting off part of your genitals might cause sexual dysfunction but leaving your body whole and intact is not going to be harmful. If you are happy with being mutilated, then I guess what they did to you when you were a helpless baby just happened to work out for you. Then again, you don't know what it is like to have the complete male genitals. Personally I would not let anyone cut off my foreskin any more than I would let anyone cut off my eyelids to let my eyeballs get all dried out and irritated.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.