Experience has changed my mind

Posted by me: 12/10/2006 http://www.lpsg.org/644720-post13.html
Hmm, after reading all of the posts and taking into consideration the experiences of my girlfriends and myself; I have opted to adapt the very nice chart done by Lee M.

0-2 = micro-mini
2-2.75 = mini
2.75-4.5 = small
4.5-5.75 = isn't that cute
5.75-6.50= average
6.5-7.75 = above average
7.75-8.5= big
8.5-9.25 = large
9.25-10= cervix pounder
10+ Porn Star

Revised: 3/5/2008
Taking into consideration my sexual experiences since I made this chart; I feel that I should change the scale a bit.

0.00 - 3.00 = micro-penis
3.00 - 4.50 = too small for me too fuck*
4.50 - 5.00 = isn't that cute
5.00 - 5.50 = average
5.50 - 6.00 = slightly above average
6.00 - 7.00 = above average
7.00 - 7.50 = big/large**
7.50 - 8.50 = hung
8.50 - 9.25 = cervix pounder
9.25+ = Porn Star

* I was with a lovely man who had a 4.5" penis last year and it was less than pleasurable. We both gave it the old college try but it was just bad.
** I prefer penises 7" in length or above.

Sorry fellas but since I am a girth loving gal anything less than 5.25" girth is unacceptable.

Comments

i like how your average is actually what the average penis size is as far as what studies have told us. average is an objective value derived from data collected in a scientific manner, so average should be the same on everyone's chart. as far as preference goes, average can be too small for one or too big for another.
 
Hmmm, kind of a mixed message njqt (my home state as well :biggrin1:). Here you list "hard numbers" :)rolleyes:) but on another thread you wonder why guys fixate on particulars. Well, when we see a table like this, can you blame us for thinking that maybe they matter?


Kevbo
 
I like how you lined up the decimal points in your version. Makes for a much easier read.

Posted 7 Hours Ago at 09:48 PM by unique_exposure
I have a touch of OCD I couldn't stop myself. :redface:


i like how your average is actually what the average penis size is as far as what studies have told us. average is an objective value derived from data collected in a scientific manner, so average should be the same on everyone's chart. as far as preference goes, average can be too small for one or too big for another.

Posted by snoozan
I did that on purpose. When I did the original chart I was basing it on the averages of men my girlfriends and I had been with rather than scientific data. The rest of the chart is still quite subjective though.

Thank you for the help. It's self explanatory as well.

Posted by stepbro
I do what I can.

A smart Jersey girl knows her numbers.

Postedby Mr. Snakey
I'm not a Rhodes Scholar but I am always willing to learn something new.

Hmmm, kind of a mixed message njqt (my home state as well :biggrin1:). Here you list "hard numbers" :)rolleyes:) but on another thread you wonder why guys fixate on particulars. Well, when we see a table like this, can you blame us for thinking that maybe they matter?
Kevbo

Posted by Kevbo
You tried to correlate height to penis size in a way that was most confusing.
 
Seems reasonable to me - obviously every woman if going to have a different idea of what is large. You have a strong sense of what you prefer and there's nothing wrong with that.
 
I think you have me mixed up with some other poster... I haven't correlated height with penis size. The "particulars" I was referring to was in a thread on vagina size in Women's Issues.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Principessa
Read time
1 min read
Views
238
Comments
11
Last update

More entries in General

More entries from Principessa

Share this entry