natural selection

rate my theory on the correlation between natural selection and penis size !
More tribal open communities such as blacks and papua new guineans have the largest penises because the women they breeded with always had the penis in sight and chose according to it, a reason for blacks having particularly large flaccid penises. More closed societies on the otherhand such as indians and asians, would never even think of penis size being a factor when choosing a groom, its taboo in those cultures, so you dont get that selection,
it works out, because when you think about it, the physical characteristics of a race change according to its customs over a large period of time. For example in arab muslim countries facial hair has always been associated with masculinity, women went for men with larger displays of facial hair, therefore guys with deficiencies in facial hair were not selected and eventually were bred out, a reasons for finding few arab muslims with the inability to produce facial hair

think about it !>!>!

Comments

maybe its because they tie them nd stretch them in those pointy bamboo cones? How come african women still have clits after years of forced clit-ectomies? or why dont the women have long necks , after having those gold rings around them for so long? hahahah
 
Analyzing penis size makes ZERO sense in reference to natural selection.

Women have had very few rights until very recently. Women in muslim countries have no right to choose their sexual partners. Your theory really sucks because it is based on the idea that women have had a right to select partners. This has not been true long enough for natural selection to have an effect. Really only a few decades and only in progressive nations in the West.
 
It is much more likely penis size evolved as a male/male reaction. Gorillas have tiny dicks. Why aren't they huge? A large penis and erection was more threatening to other males.
 
The simple truth is that penis size is not at all correlated to reproductive success (the driving force in natural selection). Nor will you find penis size even close to being the driving force in mate selection; even if bigger penises universally made for a better sexual experience, the ability to provide (stability/whatever) for ones mate and/or offspring -- among other things -- has consistently been said to offset the occasional (and reportedly mild) additional gratification of penetration by a larger organ. I personally know of no link between penis size and political/social/economic success. Not to mention that this (and similar theories have) been long ago dashed to bits; sorry.

I personally feel that penis size is "hitch-hiking" on other, desirable traits; it goes up in conjunction with this other (genetically linked) trait that is being selected for. That might make for an interesting doctoral thesis, but I'm not sure who'd approve of that grant..!
 

Blog entry information

Author
indianyoungnhung
Read time
1 min read
Views
289
Comments
4
Last update

More entries in General

Share this entry