Recently I've been thinking a lot about status and social value, and I have to say that my views on this have changed significantly since I've been on this site.
In the past, I assumed that large penises were automatically superior to small penises when it came to sex, but after being here I've come to understand that isn't the case because a lot of my views on status and social value were based around the erroneous idea that a large penis made a man sexually superior. If a large penis does not make a man sexually superior in what way does it make a man superior? this is the question I have been grappling with for the past several weeks.
It's obvious to everyone that big dicks are superior in some way, but I have no idea what that way is. In as previous post, I tried to relate big dicks to morals and character, but that was silly at best. Morality and large dicks are not related.
I just now had a thought. Perhaps I have been too narrow minded. If a big dick makes a man superior, what makes a woman superior? Obviously the woman's analogue for the penis, the vagina. Now this is where I think I might lose some of you, but bear with me and I think you will understand what I'm talking about.
During the embryonic stage of development, the penis and vagina are composed of the same anlage and differentiate at a later stage. This means that in a (very simplistic) sense, a vagina is an inverted penis. Therefore, if we accept the idea that a large penis is superior, a "large" vagina, one that is deep and able to accomodate thick penises with ease, is also superior.
I believe that this is a natural grouping mechanism for humanity. The superior people with large genitals are supposed to mate with each other, hence why their genitals match so perfectly. I don't know how strictly humanity is supposed to mate according to this genital matching system, but I don't think it's too far out there to assume that this is nature's way of making a kind of caste system.
This kind of genital caste system, if followed through would eventually lead to two different, yet interlocked, species of humanity, a population of ruling elites with extremely large genitals and a lower, working class with smaller/average genitals.
Now, I admit that the genital caste stuff is a bit out there and silly, but what I've written seems pretty logical to me. I will post more once I've had more time to think this through.
In the past, I assumed that large penises were automatically superior to small penises when it came to sex, but after being here I've come to understand that isn't the case because a lot of my views on status and social value were based around the erroneous idea that a large penis made a man sexually superior. If a large penis does not make a man sexually superior in what way does it make a man superior? this is the question I have been grappling with for the past several weeks.
It's obvious to everyone that big dicks are superior in some way, but I have no idea what that way is. In as previous post, I tried to relate big dicks to morals and character, but that was silly at best. Morality and large dicks are not related.
I just now had a thought. Perhaps I have been too narrow minded. If a big dick makes a man superior, what makes a woman superior? Obviously the woman's analogue for the penis, the vagina. Now this is where I think I might lose some of you, but bear with me and I think you will understand what I'm talking about.
During the embryonic stage of development, the penis and vagina are composed of the same anlage and differentiate at a later stage. This means that in a (very simplistic) sense, a vagina is an inverted penis. Therefore, if we accept the idea that a large penis is superior, a "large" vagina, one that is deep and able to accomodate thick penises with ease, is also superior.
I believe that this is a natural grouping mechanism for humanity. The superior people with large genitals are supposed to mate with each other, hence why their genitals match so perfectly. I don't know how strictly humanity is supposed to mate according to this genital matching system, but I don't think it's too far out there to assume that this is nature's way of making a kind of caste system.
This kind of genital caste system, if followed through would eventually lead to two different, yet interlocked, species of humanity, a population of ruling elites with extremely large genitals and a lower, working class with smaller/average genitals.
Now, I admit that the genital caste stuff is a bit out there and silly, but what I've written seems pretty logical to me. I will post more once I've had more time to think this through.