Thought about large dicks

Recently I've been thinking a lot about status and social value, and I have to say that my views on this have changed significantly since I've been on this site.

In the past, I assumed that large penises were automatically superior to small penises when it came to sex, but after being here I've come to understand that isn't the case because a lot of my views on status and social value were based around the erroneous idea that a large penis made a man sexually superior. If a large penis does not make a man sexually superior in what way does it make a man superior? this is the question I have been grappling with for the past several weeks.

It's obvious to everyone that big dicks are superior in some way, but I have no idea what that way is. In as previous post, I tried to relate big dicks to morals and character, but that was silly at best. Morality and large dicks are not related.

I just now had a thought. Perhaps I have been too narrow minded. If a big dick makes a man superior, what makes a woman superior? Obviously the woman's analogue for the penis, the vagina. Now this is where I think I might lose some of you, but bear with me and I think you will understand what I'm talking about.

During the embryonic stage of development, the penis and vagina are composed of the same anlage and differentiate at a later stage. This means that in a (very simplistic) sense, a vagina is an inverted penis. Therefore, if we accept the idea that a large penis is superior, a "large" vagina, one that is deep and able to accomodate thick penises with ease, is also superior.

I believe that this is a natural grouping mechanism for humanity. The superior people with large genitals are supposed to mate with each other, hence why their genitals match so perfectly. I don't know how strictly humanity is supposed to mate according to this genital matching system, but I don't think it's too far out there to assume that this is nature's way of making a kind of caste system.

This kind of genital caste system, if followed through would eventually lead to two different, yet interlocked, species of humanity, a population of ruling elites with extremely large genitals and a lower, working class with smaller/average genitals.

Now, I admit that the genital caste stuff is a bit out there and silly, but what I've written seems pretty logical to me. I will post more once I've had more time to think this through.

Comments

"I believe that this is a natural grouping mechanism for humanity. The superior people with large genitals are supposed to mate with each other" Well to be truth, what matters more in therms of mating, is the inmune system, and that is so complex that doesnt rely only, in how an individual looks or have

"This kind of genital caste system, if followed through would eventually lead to two different, yet interlocked, species of humanity, a population of ruling elites with extremely large genitals and a lower, working class with smaller/average genitals" i dnt know, unless carlos slim, the richest man on planet earth has a 10 inch down there, you theory is bad at best :laugh2:

Humans because of their brains, adapt to many situations, being that the case, anything can give you "social value", it just whats the group where you are into, i once knew what it was to have that, i was not popular at all in school, and this poetry contest turned all the guys that entered, into rckstars, all had girls following them around, even i had a couple, and many others trying to talk to me and such, my cousin was very popular in high school cause he was an amazing soccer player, so it could be anything
 
spotted_duck;bt28595 said:
I think you need a hobby...

I have a hobby, many in fact. I'm just trying to help people by explaining to them, the importance of penis and vagina size in their lives. Why is everyone so reluctant to accept these basic truths?
 
This is an entirely legitimate study surely, for heaven's sake. Concern about, or at least awareness of, penis size seems to be a common feature of the human male psyche. It's not a matter of who is better or worse, or more or less successful, it's just how most (all?) of us think and feel about that appendage, with the vast majority - that is, the 'averagely' endowed - thinking that the few with big ones must be overflowing with confidence, social status and, not least, sexual prowess. In a nutshell, just amazingly happy. So it comes as a shocking surprise to discover that, in many, many cases, they are not. Which disillusion does not, however, eliminate our continuing fascination and envy; and the underlying question: Why?

Else what can account for the worldwide popularity of a site like LPSG, at the heart of which is the advertising, and worship, of the Big Cock??
 
You were right in believing that morality and large dicks were in no way related. Now apply the same logic to the idea of big dicks = success in everything. Think about it - how would large genitalia automatically lead to a larger income.

And your suggestion of a caste system based on genital size sounds a little Hitler-esque, to be honest. How would the superior woman even be determined? Marching them down single file, plopping them down on the biggest dicks, and seeing which can take it? Would they then get a crown for having the ideal Deep Pussy? People amount to more than their genitals.
 
cheeseloglover;bt28604 said:
You were right in believing that morality and large dicks were in no way related. Now apply the same logic to the idea of big dicks = success in everything. Think about it - how would large genitalia automatically lead to a larger income.

I'm not saying that big dicks automatically equal a larger income, but I do think that big dicks are a sign of genetic superiority.

This is my personal opinion, so lack any kind of statistical data to back it up but, I bet if you were to get all the people with big dicks and compare them to those with little dicks you would find that the big dicks are more successful, athletic and attractive.


And your suggestion of a caste system based on genital size sounds a little Hitler-esque, to be honest. How would the superior woman even be determined? Marching them down single file, plopping them down on the biggest dicks, and seeing which can take it? Would they then get a crown for having the ideal Deep Pussy? People amount to more than their genitals.

I'm not sure how it would be determined. It's just an idea.

Yes, people are more than their genitals, but those other things that define them are at least partially determined by their genitals, IMO.
 
wallyj84;bt28605 said:
but I do think that big dicks are a sign of genetic superiority.
The only genetic superiority that really matters is about who lives longer, also, in therms of genes, its like in the olympic games, all athletes are designed to diferent things, its so hard to say who is "geneticaly superior" to other, cause no person can "do it all" , there is always something u cant do, and others can
 
Wow! I'm impressed. Seriously. You've come up with a genital-base system of Marxism!

Anyway, seriously - I give you credit for thinking about this. It's kind of interesting actually - in a theoretical-with-no-practical-value sense. But it is interesting!
 
wallyj84;bt28594 said:
Because it's important.

it's just most posts you make are about who is superior or inferior, or how you think you're inferior for not being endowed.

I think that men with large dicks are seen as better in some regard, but to me there is more to life than sex.
 
In terms of voyerism and exhibitionism. The bigger the dick the more of a turn on. You can relate that to superiority in terms of turn on level.
 
jbigncnc;bt28611 said:
Wow! I'm impressed. Seriously. You've come up with a genital-base system of Marxism!

Anyway, seriously - I give you credit for thinking about this. It's kind of interesting actually - in a theoretical-with-no-practical-value sense. But it is interesting!

Marxism? Really? There's nothing marxist about what I posted.
 
OldFirm08;bt28614 said:
The interest in penis size is often related to the fact that those who are getting no sex in their lives, are looking for visible reasons or rationality as to why they are sexually rejected. Be it a small penis or a 'too big' one, the concern often is because of their history of sexual rejection.

There's a lot of truth to that. But, that's not why I'm interested in penis size. This has actually been my best year in terms of getting laid, I've had multiple partners and encounters this year, but my views on the superiority of a large cock have changed little.
 
ILIW;bt28612 said:
it's just most posts you make are about who is superior or inferior, or how you think you're inferior for not being endowed.

I think that men with large dicks are seen as better in some regard, but to me there is more to life than sex.

A big dick affects far more than just sex. A dick size is the most important aspect of defining his personality.
 
wallyj84;bt28615 said:
Marxism? Really? There's nothing marxist about what I posted.
Also looks a lot like the view of hitler about how the world whould be ruled where, where physical apparence was more important than anything
 
To me-It has to do with what society deems as having a greater value. Its this consensus of society(accumulated over hundred of years) that determines if these variables of humanity are considered as a positive or negative trait.
 
D
Im sorry my dick size has nothing to do with my personality. What defines us is our jounery though ours lives. How, we relate to one another. Having many parters dosn't make one happy. You your self just showed that having a larger penis, dosen't make on happy....What makes one happy is being happy with one's self. That's the real answer, being happy with one self.
 

Blog entry information

Author
wallyj84
Read time
2 min read
Views
285
Comments
18
Last update

More entries in General

More entries from wallyj84

Share this entry