100% straight

[mystromio]

For all those guys who post that they are 100% straight, you might be interested in this.

Experiments have been done with penile plethysmography (mercury-filled condoms that measures even the smallest increases in blood flow to the penis). Images of men and women were flashed to the study participants. The straight men who claimed to be only straight, and to only have interest in women showed MORE reaction to the male images than the straight men who were less definitive. In addition, as per the cliché, the more homophobic the straight man, the more increase in blood flow to his penis with the male images.

So, at least for those in the know, know your penis! And be careful what you say, in case we've read this study!

 

[Heather LouAnna]

For all those guys who post that they are 100% straight, you might be interested in this.

Experiments have been done with penile plethysmography (mercury-filled condoms that measures even the smallest increases in blood flow to the penis). Images of men and women were flashed to the study participants. The straight men who claimed to be only straight, and to only have interest in women showed MORE reaction to the male images than the straight men who were less definitive. In addition, as per the cliché, the more homophobic the straight man, the more increase in blood flow to his penis with the male images.

So, at least for those in the know, know your penis! And be careful what you say, in case we've read this study!

LMAO. I seriously just lolcano'd, you guys. That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. This is for you.


Your story sounds all good and well, but where a link of proof? Where's your quotes? Where's your references? Any argument needs concrete proof. You would have sucked at debate.


Oh, and...welcome to the board. Enjoy your stay. We're pleased to have you aboard. lol *curtsy*:biggrin1:

 

[Pecker]

Oh, I might absolutely burst a mercury-filled condom in such an experiment - my fantasies are quite vivid, but I have no desire to have physical contact with or by a male IRL.

Have you ever watched a heist movie and rooted for the bank robbers? Does that make you prone to rob banks?

I'll stick with my 100% hetero, thank you.

 

[PacknThick]

Thinking or reacting to an image, AND doing something to the image or subject are TWO different scenarios.

Women love to comment and talk about other women in respect to look regarding breasts, hair, style, etc. That is "gay" to some extent but more acceptable. DO they go out and wanna hook up with them, no.

 

[pichulon]

Straight men are straight, by definition there is no desire for the same sex. Bisexual is , by definition, a person that desires both. Gay, by definition, is a person that exclusively desires same sex partners.
I do not understand the insistence, on some members, to try to add bi characteristics to straight men. A man, who calls himself straight, but is attracted to men, is not really straight, but bisexual.
There is no in between.
It is simple.
As for the article, facts , references, prove...or else, it is just baloney.

 

[B_Stronzo]

LMAO. I seriously just lolcano'd, you guys. That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. This is for you.

Why did you post a photo of a cookie?

Why does it seem so 'stupid' to you? And if memory serves me correctly you 'lolcanco'd' this site about a week ago.

In the context of real homophobia I wouldn't deny that there's some credence to the post.

Your story sounds all good and well, but where a link of proof? Where's your quotes? Where's your references? Any argument needs concrete proof. You would have sucked at debate.

It's the individual's first post. Geeez. Give the poster a break.

 

[B_Stronzo]

Straight men are straight, by definition there is no desire for the same sex. Bisexual is , by definition, a person that desires both. Gay, by definition, is a person that exclusively desires same sex partners.
I do not understand the insistence, on some members, to try to add bi characteristics to straight men. A man, who calls himself straight, but is attracted to men, is not really straight, but bisexual.
There is no in between.

You don't actually believe that horse manure you just posted do you "pichulon"? The world is crystal clear to you isn't it?

 

[mystromio]

One of the articles I found is in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1996 vol 103 #3 pp440-445

You can read the article at this link:

http://www.oogachaga.com/downloads/homophobia_and_homosexual_arousal.pdf


As an exclusively gay man, I would nevertheless say I have heterosexual impulses and attractions. We shouldn't confuse someone who has had only straight experiences, never a gay experience, as being 100% straight. A closeted homosexual, like my own uncle (by his own admission), may only have had straight experiences and thus qualify as "100%" straight in this manner.

What we are talking about is, at least for some, homophobia. For some, saying "I am 100% straight" also means "don't call me fag", "I am not the least bit sissy" etc. (not for all....please don't misinterpret....but for some).

Homoeroticism abounds in the all-male world IMHO. I see all the straight hockey players at my gym showering after practice. I see how they interact, show off, stay needlessly naked and over-soap their dicks. I know they go home and fuck their girlfriends. This is all fine with me. I would never say they were gay. I would just like them to acknowledge this is part of sexuality, and it is not so perverted, hateful or scarey.

 

[BIGBULL29]

Mystromio, this is a fascinating thread subject. Other studies of this nature have been conducted, indicating that a naked man/ penis could trigger an erection among society's most heterosexual males.

I don't think mystromio has to post any study reports to make his case on LPSG. No studies can prove, but rather suggest and sometimes quite strongly that something is/is not the case. To think that there is absolutely no truth to these penile plethysmography studies measuring men's physical reactions to naked men/women to better explain sexual orientation would be equivalent to saying that LPSG does not cater to the big dick fetish.

 

[pichulon]

You don't actually believe that horse manure you just posted do you "pichulon"? The world is crystal clear to you isn't it?

Hey bud, I am just leaving quarters, so, I promisse I will reply to you.
got to go.

 

[Dr Rock]

i can't help wondering why the whole sexual percentile thing is such a constant topic. someone always seems to be positing this or that information in order to claim that this or that "orientation" doesn't exist. is it no longer trendy to just assume that other people may, in fact, know more about their own sexuality that you do?

 

[D_alex8]

is it no longer trendy to just assume that other people may, in fact, know more about their own sexuality that you do?

When was that ever trendy?

The entire history of humankind shows people constantly trying to force one another into pigeonholes that have little or no relation to the way individuals actually feel about themselves.

 

[Love-it]

I have a slight curve in my penis, does that mean I am not straight?

 

[Snakebyte]

well 100% straight in my case means I only will have sex with women. It does not mean that I can't think a man is sexy.

 

[Reese]

Straight men are straight, by definition there is no desire for the same sex. Bisexual is , by definition, a person that desires both. Gay, by definition, is a person that exclusively desires same sex partners.

Hmm. This leads me to a question: The wife & I are frequently in the habit of taking single guys to bed with us. While we prefer those who consider themselves bisexual (or at least bi-curious) so they're comfortable with any eventuality, such self-professed bi-guys are not always available. Thus, sometimes we'll relinquish our "rigourous standards" and acquiesce to a straight single male (as long as they're OK with single-entry double-penetration, that is).

However, when we get them into bed, I've been rather surprised at the number of "100% straight" blokes who don't seem to mind being touched, jacked-off or even sucked by a man when it gets right down to it. Is it the fact that they're being distracted by a pair of big tits in their face whilst this is going on, placing their focus entirely upon the woman (seems likely)? Is it simply a matter of "any hole's a goal" in a groupsex situation (less likely)? Is it that they're just putting up with this because they know they'll ultimately get to f*ck my missus (most likely)?

Despite the fact that these "straight" guys have allowed another male to interact sexually with them, I still wouldn't necessarily consider them fully bisexual unless they were willing to reciprocate the male-male attention - and, in 90% of the cases we've experienced, they're not. So...do we need a new label for straight blokes who don't mind a bit of "male bonding" provided a female is present? Or do we just lump these into the bi- category as well?!

 

[phantom73]

I had more sex with women after I came out of the closet. So maybe I shouldn't consider myself to be 100% gay??
Maybe...90/10 or 80/20...damn...what's that formula again?

Uuughh...what is it with all of this fucking math???

 

[fortiesfun]

The entire history of humankind shows people constantly trying to force one another into pigeonholes that have little or no relation to the way individuals actually feel about themselves.

It is true that this has happened, but I would suggest something else that has happened throughout history is at the heart of this debate: the way people feel about themselves is often at odds with their observable behavior. If you define "straight", as someone who recognizes attraction only to the opposite sex, i.e. as an identity, then one's feelings are of the upmost importance. But not everyone agrees that such labels are only about identity. Both orientation and behavior are also legitimate ways to define sexuality.

The world being what it is, there are political implications to privileging identity over orientation or actual behavior. A lot of men with 100% straight identities have sexual interactions with other men at some point, and more often than not, rationalize that behavior away rather than adjust their sense of identity. There is fallout from that when some, far from all, but some, then start making decisions about the civil rights of others based on their own sense of "rightness" about their personal identity.

Of course, nothing can be proved about anyone else's sexual identity, but it is interesting to note increasing bodies of evidence to suggest these (gay or straight) are not very accurate in predicting one's sexual practices over the course of a lifetime.

 

[dongalong]

For all those guys who post that they are 100% straight, you might be interested in this.

Experiments have been done with penile plethysmography (mercury-filled condoms that measures even the smallest increases in blood flow to the penis). Images of men and women were flashed to the study participants. The straight men who claimed to be only straight, and to only have interest in women showed MORE reaction to the male images than the straight men who were less definitive. In addition, as per the cliché, the more homophobic the straight man, the more increase in blood flow to his penis with the male images.

So, at least for those in the know, know your penis! And be careful what you say, in case we've read this study!

There are many threads like this where gay men try to convince heteros that they are really a bit gay. You just want more choice don't you?

I think that that test has flaws. What that test didn't show, was what is going through the participant's mind.
I like to check out other guy's dicks (on the internet and in porn) - not because I'd like to have a bit of bum-fun with them but rather, I imagine what it must be like fucking a woman with such a huge cock. Big cock hetero porn is my favourite, I get turned on by the women's reactions. This could be a reason for the increased blood flow in some participants. Of course others probably just want to screw the guy in the photo.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

Even if the study were 100% on the money, it still proves nothing about sexual orientation. Increased blood flow to the genitals while watching gay porn does not make you gay. Obviously. I mean, sometimes I get an erection playing Magic Online. Or driving my car. Or making a sandwich. There might be some correlation, maybe the strange and unfamiliar gay porn increased a more heightened state of awareness in the straight participants in the study because they had never watched gay porn before, as opposed to the gay guys in the study, who, for them, this was probably old hat. Or it could have led the straight men to think of other kinds of sex. Doesn't matter, it proves next to nothing.

Curiously, I fill all my condoms with mercury before use. I find the dementia it causes makes my orgasms more intense.

 

[B_NineInchCock_160IQ]

I had more sex with women after I came out of the closet. So maybe I shouldn't consider myself to be 100% gay??
Maybe...90/10 or 80/20...damn...what's that formula again?

Uuughh...what is it with all of this fucking math???

I'm starting to think that maybe I should be gay so I can get more women. Right now I'm straight and most of the attention I get is from guys. What is it with people always going after what they think they can't have?