I bought a Spanish version of the 1001 Books at el Aeteneo bookstore in Buenos Aires several years ago. The biggest problem I have with the list is that it focuses almost exclusively on Western Civilization. It does include the Ilyad, Oddyssey, and Homer's Epic poems, some Aristotle, and some Roman poets (Pliny for example). But there is a stunning absence of Hindu literature (the Vedas, Bhagavad Gita!), Chinese literature (The Analicts of Confuscius, without which South Korean business could not operate including I Ching, and Tao Te Ching), virtually no mention of Buddhist texts (Theravada, The Lotus Sutra, in fact none of the many famous sutras).
The list is heavy on English literature, beginning with Chaucer, and many obscure works by eastern European authors. It's equally heavy on French and German literature. What Spanish language works are listed are mostly modern 20th Century writers.
But the compilation of recommended books has been under fire by most academics of world comparative literature since the first edition was published.
Of more importance, if, as someone mentioned earlier, you find The Great Gatsby difficult to read and your only language is English, well . . . that's a major tragedy. Obviously you'll never be able to wade through translations from the original German into English of such works as Magic Mountain (no, it's not a ride at Disney World). God forbid 'Mericuhn intermediate and high school students should be challenged develop reading skills that give them entrance into the prose of Henry James, (or his brother, William).
I maintain that anyone who cannot easily read 20th Century American authors (Light in August, by Faulkner for example) and whose native language is English is living evidence that the public school system in the USA has been purposefully dumbed down by the various State Departments of Education so as to keep the masses undereducated and too lazy (or ill equipped) to pick up a book and read. There's a major conspiracy, in my humble opinion, to dismantle intellectual thought and discourse in the USA since at least the first year Reagan became President (who, as I understand preferred to read and reread the works of Zane Gray -- look him up, Zane Gray's books aren't bad writing, but you won't be terribly impressed). I don't hate the United States of America, but I do hate how the gullible TV-watching public has been conned into reading fluff that doesn't challenge them.
I remember looking at a list of goals taped above the computer of the payroll/book keeper at a software company where I worked. The goals were from a Stephen R. Covey book on self-improvement. One of those goals was: Read one book a month. One book a month! God help her, I hope she didn't overtax her little brain! Why not at least one book a week? I might add she was the sister-in-law of the CEO and never churned out a bi-monthly payroll without making 10 or 12 mistakes with the employees' paychecks. I truly felt sorry for her.
My Mexican grandmother gave me a copy of Death in Venice when I was 12 years-old for a birthday present. I was thrilled. I doubt 90% (or possibly a higher percentage) of posters to LPSG have a clue who wrote that book, let alone have read it. It's fucking unconscionable. And I'm not trying to say I'm better than anyone else because I'm a voracious reader.
My point is how most 'Mericuhns are purposefully disabled by government-sponsored public education and who will probably never experience the joy of consuming a good novel that challenges their thoughts and spurs them on to think for them selves. Case in point. Tom Sawyer was written for a reading audience of 10 to 14 year-olds. It's also a good read for adults, too. However, it has a universal appeal to young readers. Therefore, imagine how sad it was for me to discover that my 5th graders had not read the book. However, they did have the book read to them by a previous instructor. Yes, children, rest your heads on your desks as teacher reads one or two chapters of Tom Sawyer an hour before the end of the school day bell rings. That's a major tragedy. My maternal grandmother, who dropped out of the 6th grade after two months read Tom Sawyer when she was 11 years-old. And she was born in 1880!
Sorry, the graphic novel is just a thick comic book. It ain't literature. Therefore, even if the 1001 Books ya gotta read before you die is controversial, it pales in controversy compared to popular, contemporary science fiction. But those of you reading science fiction already know how poorly educated most of the USA population is. As for the graphic novel, well the panel drawings are so pretty you don't need to have an imagination.
I'm not above incorrectly using the wrong version of there, their, or they're when I'm typing fast. Same goes for the use of to and too, your and you're. But for the most part they are simple typos or an example of me not proof reading before I post. And I'm great and misspelling words when I should know better.
However, trust me folks, from the consistent bad grammar, outright poor spelling, and inability to write a complete sentence or inability to coordinate subjects and verbs that I read in so many posts on LPSG, believe me when I say you've gotten a raw deal from most of your State tax supported public schools. I suggest you get together and form a public interest groups intent upon getting a refund for receiving such lack luster educations.
As for the 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Kick the Bucket, although I don't agree with many of the selections you should all read as many of the suggested books that you can. Your lives will be a lot richer for it than just sitting around and watching Desperate Housewives.