1bigg1...

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Didn’t you just explain why in another thread when saying “conservatives are douche bags” ….. so what’s the question again?
 

D_N Flay Table

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
2,711
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
183
Didn’t you just explain why in another thread when saying “conservatives are douche bags” ….. so what’s the question again?

I am a fiscal conservative, but me and my family cannot tolerate the way the country has been run for the last 8 years.
YOU might work in a economy proof profession, but most of Americans do not.
Please, and really be specific...
Why are you choosing McCain Palin as your party?
 

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
McCain has wisdom that Obama will not have for decades and the world, especially the bad guys respect him. In that regard I have a feeling Obama is a laughing-stock.

The economy will work itself out no matter who gets in although pandering to the bottom will make that recovery much slower.

Nothing personal against Obama, I just think he is an idealist without-a-clue successfully selling sound-bites to those with even-less-of-a-clue.
 

B_ScaredLittleBoy

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Posts
3,235
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Is it "wisdom" to want to go to war for an indeterminate amount of time?

Is it "wisdom" to deny a woman freedom of her own body and for her to have no say

Is it "wisdom" to have every sentence you speak contain some reference to war and national security?

I would have thought a person with wisdom would realise that war is an illness that causes problems and is not a 'cure' for anything. Or do you think national and international situations have been improved by the war in Iraq?

I would have thought a person with wisdom would realise that government; a collective has no right to decide what is an individual matter and bypass and ignore the wants or needs of the individual. This seems to be the Republican MO though, in terms of abortion and many other issues.

I would have thought a person with wisdom would have a vocabulary that expanded to more than just synonyms for war and national security. I would have thought a person with wisdom would be able to eloquently and thoroughly discuss matters such as economy, domestic housing and employment. And to offer viable and effective solutions.

Definitions of "wisdom" must be extremely disparate between countries. Because I could have sworn McCain was an antonym for 'wisdom' in the Oxford Dictionary.
 

curious n str8

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Posts
913
Media
6
Likes
8
Points
163
Age
33
Location
The big AK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Is it "wisdom" to want to go to war for an indeterminate amount of time? No, but is it "wisdom" to want to prevent terrorists attacks against innocent people, btw how many terrorist attacks has your country had in the past few yrs?

Is it "wisdom" to deny a woman freedom of her own body and for her to have no say Yes when it involves innocent fetuses,and if you ask most women who had an abortion they never feel good about it.

Is it "wisdom" to have every sentence you speak contain some reference to war and national security? Now your just exzadurating.

I would have thought a person with wisdom would realise that war is an illness that causes problems and is not a 'cure' for anything. Or do you think national and international situations have been improved by the war in Iraq? Depend on who's view your looking at.

I would have thought a person with wisdom would realise that government; a collective has no right to decide what is an individual matter and bypass and ignore the wants or needs of the individual. This seems to be the Republican MO though, in terms of abortion and many other issues. Especially when it comes one's individual taxes.

I would have thought a person with wisdom would have a vocabulary that expanded to more than just synonyms for war and national security. I would have thought a person with wisdom would be able to eloquently and thoroughly discuss matters such as economy, domestic housing and employment. And to offer viable and effective solutions. I've always thought it was more effective to use a simple vocabulary when taking to people why confuse them with a vocabulary they can't understand.

Definitions of "wisdom" must be extremely disparate between countries. Because I could have sworn McCain was an antonym for 'wisdom' in the Oxford Dictionary.
I guess you could say the same for Obama.
 

dreamer20

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Posts
7,963
Media
3
Likes
19,599
Points
643
Gender
Male

Originally Posted by ScaredLittleBoy http://www.lpsg.org/images36/buttons/viewpost.gif
Is it "wisdom" to want to go to war for an indeterminate amount of time?

No, but is it "wisdom" to want to prevent terrorists attacks against innocent people, btw how many terrorist attacks has your country had in the past few yrs?


curious n str8 re:terrorism: Britain has been invaluable to the USA and has warned the U.S. about terrorist threats numerous times.

See Claire Talon's post: Re: The So Called "War On Terror"

Claire Talon said:
Lately I've come to a very good conclusion, I guess. It was while I was watching TV, and saw the coverage of the umpteenth declaration of the good ol' "War on Terrorism" speeches of Bush. Here's what I thought.

I saw that all arrests and successful investigations of latest acts of terrorism came from countries where these investigations were handled by police forces, while military is never, or hardly involved. On the other hand, we (the US) have employed a lot of military forces and come up with a lot of nothing.

This made me think that the term "war on terrorism" is not a matching metaphor. While war implies that you have a concrete opponent, a clear objective, and clear conditions that make you a winner or vanquished, the struggle against terrorism isn't so easy. Therefore, anyone who expects to win this "war" is misled, moreover, this so-called war must be considered as a permanent struggle against an abstract opponent, which will never be won. A "victory" in this case will mean that terrorism is only subdued for some time, forced to hide and remain inactive because of a lack of possible targets, and the increased danger of the terrorists' plans being uncovered through agents infiltrating into the terrorist networks. History proves this, as terrorist organizations which have been infiltrated by the police and intelligence agencies usually grind to a halt, and are very limited in their operations.
 

lucky8

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Posts
3,623
Media
0
Likes
187
Points
193
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The best way to prevent terrorism is to not let terrorists inside the country. That is the ONLY way they can attack us, from INSIDE our country, and increasing measures to stop them from entering is the only sure-fire way to prevent attacks. They don't have international cruise missiles piled up in those caves they live in...get real. And even if they did, I'm sure our immense missile defense system would be next to impossible to penetrate, we're fucking America, the most advanced, safest, and most protected nation on Earth. The war has only strengthend the movement and recruited more anti-American sentiment than there was before we went into Iraq. Iraq is by far worse off now than it was when Saddam was in power. Let's secure our borders before we wage another war on 100s of 1000s of poor cave dwellers who have no means of attacking from outside of America.
 

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
The best way to prevent terrorism is to not let terrorists inside the country. That is the ONLY way they can attack us, from INSIDE our country, and increasing measures to stop them from entering is the only sure-fire way to prevent attacks. They don't have international cruise missiles piled up in those caves they live in...get real. And even if they did, I'm sure our immense missile defense system would be next to impossible to penetrate, we're fucking America, the most advanced, safest, and most protected nation on Earth. The war has only strengthend the movement and recruited more anti-American sentiment than there was before we went into Iraq. Iraq is by far worse off now than it was when Saddam was in power. Let's secure our borders before we wage another war on 100s of 1000s of poor cave dwellers who have no means of attacking from outside of America.

Your plan for isolationism will not work. We already have people legally living here bombing buildings (WTC), flying jets into buildings (WTC), attacks on our embassies outside of the country, bomb-laden speedboat attack etc. but in the overall scheme of things these are really nothing with what’s going on all over the world nearly everyday.

Like it has been doing for 2000 years now, it will continue to escalate and WMD along with easy delivery methods get easier and cheaper everyday. This 2000 year old problem needs to be addressed and should have been decades ago. Tightening up the borders (which will never work anyway as I could show you many easy places to cross where you would never be seen) is not the answer, extermination is and we may as well do that where they breed.
 

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
.....

Is it "wisdom" to deny a woman freedom of her own body and for her to have no say

.....

Greater wisdom than murdering a baby. We would throw her in jail quickly if she murdered her baby 1 second after it was delivered and to me anyway, delivery is not a milestone that warrants separate treatment for murder.
 

D_N Flay Table

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
2,711
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
183
See...
You are GAY in Wisconsin and a Republican..
Why don't you "come out" as openly gay at your party's rallies?
I am sure they would love you.
and you sir...
are a total douche.
there...
I said it.
 

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
See...
You are GAY in Wisconsin and a Republican..
Why don't you "come out" as openly gay at your party's rallies?
I am sure they would love you.
and you sir...
are a total douche.
there...
I said it.


Not sure what decade you are living in but gay republicans are not a new concept and yeah, one of my homes is in Wisconsin, another in a "blue" state and another in a "red" state. Sorry to burst your bubble but nobody gives a fuck in any of them. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

BIGDP

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Posts
508
Media
11
Likes
396
Points
458
Location
Austin (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Hey, DJG --

Although you don't need it, I've got your back against these red state douches and wieners.

Just remember, George W. Bullshit, and his 8 years with our trillions of dollars at war for nothing plus thousands of young men and women killed, and our latest and greatest decline on Wall Street and bailing out his dad's friends, etc. That's all the republican you need to know.

Sorry, folks, but you can tell I feel a little bit passionate about our man in the White House.

Bring on the criticism, bitches!!!
DP
 

Mensch1351

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Posts
1,166
Media
0
Likes
341
Points
303
Location
In the only other State that begins with "K"!
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Your plan for isolationism will not work. We already have people legally living here bombing buildings (WTC), flying jets into buildings (WTC), attacks on our embassies outside of the country, bomb-laden speedboat attack etc. but in the overall scheme of things these are really nothing with what’s going on all over the world nearly everyday.

Like it has been doing for 2000 years now, it will continue to escalate and WMD along with easy delivery methods get easier and cheaper everyday. This 2000 year old problem needs to be addressed and should have been decades ago. Tightening up the borders (which will never work anyway as I could show you many easy places to cross where you would never be seen) is not the answer, extermination is and we may as well do that where they breed.

And then of course we have the terrorist Timothy McVeigh who was born and raised here!!! Ya know -- the Oklahoma bombings!
 

davec94

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
341
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
163
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Your plan for isolationism will not work. We already have people legally living here bombing buildings (WTC), flying jets into buildings (WTC), attacks on our embassies outside of the country, bomb-laden speedboat attack etc. but in the overall scheme of things these are really nothing with what’s going on all over the world nearly everyday.

Like it has been doing for 2000 years now, it will continue to escalate and WMD along with easy delivery methods get easier and cheaper everyday. This 2000 year old problem needs to be addressed and should have been decades ago. Tightening up the borders (which will never work anyway as I could show you many easy places to cross where you would never be seen) is not the answer, extermination is and we may as well do that where they breed.

What is this 2000 year thing you're talking about? Neither America or Islam existed 2000 years ago...
 

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
What is this 2000 year thing you're talking about? Neither America or Islam existed 2000 years ago...

Just figurative speech to make a point, I should have said “since the beginning of recorded history” minimum and answering your question = religious extremism in government is the problem.

The peoples of the eastern Mediterranean & Middle East areas got their law starting with the alleged Moses, next the Christians come along and claim this alleged god had a son or reincarnated himself (depending on their view of the trinity) named the alleged Jesus with another gobbledygook mess of alleged laws, next Muhammad claims the alleged Old Testament angle Gabriel came to him with additional revelation from the alleged Jewish god and he had his set of laws written accordingly….. and then of course there were a zillion others like Joseph Smith (Mormon) and CT Russell (Jehovah’s Witnesses) with their alleged additional revelation.

The point, the Jews and Christians have been pretty much shoved back into the closet where they belong law-wise while the followers of Islam are generally the law