I was only 2 years old at that time. I think specific Olympics will be important to each person. For now, it will be this one for me.
I would have been 10 when Calgary had their Olympics, but I don't remember anything about that one at all.
well, you were also probably to young to remember that Canada had some *MASSIVE* clashes between the Canadian NHL all stars and those same Soviet Teams...
these were titanic clashes as well, and naturally, all hockey fans here in the USA were rooting for the canadians as well.
from 1972 to 1987, the Canada vs Soviet matches were epic...i was a tad to young to see the two famed summit series in 1972 and 1974 (i was born in 71) but iwas old enough to see all the later "Canada Cup" games and the Challenge Cups as well.
the Soviets and Canada were matched pretty evenly in those games, with the Soviets winning 13 total games, Canada winning 12 and the two teams drew 5 times IIRC...but in all thed World Championships and exhibition games the Soviets dominated with 22 wins and 4 draws and Canada only won 4 times...
the Soviet pro teams that played NHL all star teams also when the majority of the time.
those Soviet teams from 70s and 80s were incredible...you could not help but be impressed by their passing, stickhandling and precision, especially on the larger european rinks...
I really loved hockey pre 1995...since then it has really lost importance to me as the NHL has become less interesting.
the rinks in northa america are still too small for my liking and i prefer the more open european style, but the smaller rink suits the more physical Canadian and American squads...
that being said, i do love to watch Ovechkin...Crosby is great, undeniably, and probably a better overall team guy in terms of passing, distribution and controlling the tempo as the center, wheras Ovechkin is a true dominating sniper.
I honestly wonder what Ovechkin could have done in the more free scoring 80s and 90s.
i loved those guys like Selanne, Bure, Mogilny, Hull, Bossy, Lemieux, Jagr, when all these guys were in their prime...and you had defensemen like Coffey, Leetch and Chelios...
it jsut seems like there is more emphasis on physicality and tangling on the boards in recent years...and as the players have gotten bigger and stronger and faster, my oopinion is that it is impeding offense.
i can understand not wanting to expand rinks to the european level, but north american rinks are just too small for my liking
our rinks are only 85 feet wide, while europes are 98.4 feet...
...not to mention the distance in the neutral zone between the blue lines is far shorter in North America, 50 feet vs 58 feet...and there is extra space, about 1.5 feet extra, from the boards to the goal line.
i really would like to see more open play, but doubt it will ever happen here.
even if we here in north america just opened it up a little bit, i think it would be great...say 91 feet in width....54 feet between the blue lines.
just enough to allow the really talented offensive players more room.
i always hated "grinder" dump and chase hockey...or don cherry hockey...i want to see flow, passing, skating, movement... not just grinders who tie up skill players on the boards all the time.
i used to love watching a guy like Bure flying up the ice...watching some knucklehead scrounging on the boards these days is just boring.