- Joined
- Jun 11, 2018
- Posts
- 1,016
- Media
- 26
- Likes
- 6,055
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
so, I’ve been having a debate with a friend.
If a guy is 4.7 x 4” erect, would you consider him small?
My friend basically says that that size would be “regular” and not really small unless it was compared with a larger guy.
My take is that it’s below average and small on its own. And would be noticeably smaller than a regular guy whether there is someone else to compare to or not.
I’m thinking that this guy is 4.7 x 4 himself, or somewhere in that range, and doesn’t want to admit an obvious truth about that size when, I suspect, it would apply to himself.
What’s you guys’ take. If a guy or his girlfriend admitted to you that he had 4.7” x 4”, would you think flat out that he is small or “regular”?
If a guy is 4.7 x 4” erect, would you consider him small?
My friend basically says that that size would be “regular” and not really small unless it was compared with a larger guy.
My take is that it’s below average and small on its own. And would be noticeably smaller than a regular guy whether there is someone else to compare to or not.
I’m thinking that this guy is 4.7 x 4 himself, or somewhere in that range, and doesn’t want to admit an obvious truth about that size when, I suspect, it would apply to himself.
What’s you guys’ take. If a guy or his girlfriend admitted to you that he had 4.7” x 4”, would you think flat out that he is small or “regular”?