(As a member, not a mod, admin or Rob's lapdog!)
Take a look around the site for a second... It is littered with 100% straight men trying to hook up in the chat room with other men, 100% straight men posting about how straight they are, even though they're spending their evenings with their best mates cock in their mouths.
Now I couldn't care less if I tried about how they wish to label themselves, or what they consider straight/gay, but it is somewhat misleading when it comes to making the call as to where to draw the line gallery wise.
(In general)
I think it is safe to say that the majority of gay men aren't interested in viewing the female galleries.
I think it is safe to assume (though we have no verified ones) that the gay women aren't interested in viewing the male galleries.
I think it is safe to assume that bi-sexual men/women don't really care which galleries they're viewing.
I think it is safe to assume that gay men are interested in looking at men, regardless of their sexuality.
I think it is safe to assume that if any group within the forum is going to have an issue with comments from other men, it is likely to be those within the 100% straight group.
I think it is safe to assume that while MOST people aren't going to run screaming around the room at the sight of male on male gallery activity, if anyone is going to get pissy about it showing up in the straight group, it's going to be the 100% straights. (You should see the number of complaints, quite rude ones at times that come in about anything even slightly, possibly, maybe, if you squint and have had lots to drink, gay found in the straight adult websites section!)
I think it is safe to assume that not everyone is as clear cut as the next, and in the grand scheme of things, for these purposes, put themselves in the wrong percentage.
I think it is safe to assume, that unless reported, I'll not be looking at any of them!
So while I agree that the groupings aren't perfect, and I agree that 99% straight does not a gay person make, it is the most logical solution to keeping the content grouped as accurately as possible, without requesting that Rob either:
1. Demand everyone display a percentage
2. The percentage be based solely upon the images within their gallery (if they have one)
3. That they change their percentage should their gallery change.
or
1. Demand the mod team do a daily sweep of all galleries by those who either don't declare a percentage, or aren't 100% either way. Each gallery to be checked each and every day, and well, we can't change which group they fall under with this temporary system, so we'll either have to remove the gallery, or change the users percentage...
I personally don't like either of those options, and would support neither.
Rob has stated that this is a temporary system, a quick fix until the real one is in place with all of it's bells, whistles and flashing lights. He never said it was perfect, he said it was "quick"
Edit: For those commenting that sorting isn't needed, give this thread a quick read and you'll see that many members think quite differently...
http://www.lpsg.org/234327-**-announcement-**-site-downtime.html I personally don't care either way, but I don't use the gallery!