A Burning Question: Buff vs. Fit?

wishiwashung

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
465
Media
1
Likes
369
Points
283
Location
Massachusetts, USA
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Well I am just wondering what you guys have a preference for, Fit [I guess that'd be thin] or buff [like a body builder] types?
For clarification my idea of "Fit" would be something like: http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n267/sha-shinizzle/bloggie/tattoos.jpg , where the man isn't hugely muscular but thin[ner].
An example of "Buff" would be: Well actually I think you get it, I can't really find a picturing showing my idea.
Anyways my preference is "Fit", can't wait to hear yours!:biggrin1:
 

D_Martin van Burden

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 6, 2002
Posts
3,229
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
258
I'm thinking that fit men are becoming more popular. One of my friends is in really good shape, but despite having a good build, he wishes he were a lot leaner. And I know that my body probably couldn't handle a bodybuilder's frame, so... I'm going to go for fit too.

To that, I add that it's not necessary to shave every bit of body hair off of you in an effort to do a throwback toward prepubescence. That's cool if you don't grow it naturally, but give the Mach 3 a rest already. :)
 

wishiwashung

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
465
Media
1
Likes
369
Points
283
Location
Massachusetts, USA
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
You know I was thinking that it seemed that "fit" was becoming more popular too. I wonder if this is something that changes in society similar to say, fashion, or this is some sort of new trend.

I must admit though, I prefer less hair than more. I like hair on legs and hair on under-arms is fine, but I'm not much of an advocate for back hair or a forest on the chest. Then again I also really fall for the guys with "emo/scene" hair, but thats a whole new thread in itself.
 

erratic

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Posts
4,289
Media
0
Likes
512
Points
333
Sexuality
No Response
I tend to like fit because fit guys tend to look more evenly-proportioned. Some buff guys look amazing, but I find most have at least one muscle group that doesn't look in sync with the others.
 

ZOS23xy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Posts
4,906
Media
3
Likes
31
Points
258
Location
directly above the center of the earth
I don't have the genetics to be extremely buff. I'll go for fit and flexible. I see too many people who get stiffer in their old age because they didn't do a walk around the block every other day.

Buff can be sexy, and I've had a share of some of them, but I find fit to be just as good.

Too much weight on me worries me...
 

Jovial

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Posts
2,328
Media
8
Likes
124
Points
193
Location
CA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I think buff can mean fit, but I guess the OP is taking buff to mean bigger muscles and fit to mean lean with less muscle. Can't someone be both?



<----------------- me in avatar...am I buff, fit or both?
 

SteveHd

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Posts
3,678
Media
0
Likes
82
Points
183
Location
Daytona
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I think buff can mean fit, but I guess the OP is taking buff to mean bigger muscles and fit to mean lean with less muscle. Can't someone be both?
In general buff would also be fit. I think the O/P was trying to differentiate a "slight build," that is someone who is just shy of being "defined".

Offhand, I can't think of a better term for "fit". Perhaps "swimmer's build"?
<----------------- me in avatar...am I buff, fit or both?
Borderline "buff" in my view. I like the full body pics!
 

Strathos

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Posts
69
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
151
Location
TN
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
My absolute favorite kind of body is the way Patrick Warburton in that Tim Allen movie. To me, that is perfection.