A glimpse into Obama's security?

Notaguru2

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Posts
1,519
Media
0
Likes
10
Points
123
Location
Charleston, SC
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
If you saw Obama's speech, did you notice those huge panes of what appeared to be glass around Obama? They weren't teleprompters because I could see those. I wonder if it was some type of protective type thing... I haven't seen these on stage before.
 

Phil Ayesho

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Posts
6,189
Media
0
Likes
2,789
Points
333
Location
San Diego
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Probably bullet proof glass- the Secret Service does not want to lose THIS one...

And the far right did try their best to get Amurahcans scared shitless of Obama...
 

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Probably bullet proof glass- the Secret Service does not want to lose THIS one...

And the far right did try their best to get Amurahcans scared shitless of Obama...

you truly are an idiot phil.

does the secret service want to lose *ANY* president they protect?

idiot.
 

B_RedDude

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Posts
1,929
Media
0
Likes
82
Points
183
Location
California
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I read this morning on MSNBC that they were thick bullet-proof glass


If you saw Obama's speech, did you notice those huge panes of what appeared to be glass around Obama? They weren't teleprompters because I could see those. I wonder if it was some type of protective type thing... I haven't seen these on stage before.
 

marleyisalegend

Loved Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Posts
6,126
Media
1
Likes
611
Points
333
Age
38
Location
charlotte
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
yeah that somehow losing Obama would be worse, for racial reasons...cause that makes him more important than anyone...ever.

Phil said nothing about Obama's race, nor did he say that Obama is more important than anyone. You've misinterepreted the comments of an intelligent man to sound like drivel. Stop translating Phil's words into your unintelligible language.
 

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
No, but they've sure lost a few.

oh the secret service has lost a few?

nice try...they lost *ONE*

JFK

unbelievable...these people are dedicated professionals who risk their lives to protect the president and you say they have "lost a few"?

yeah they have only been protecting the president since *AFTER* the McKInley assassination, which is what spurred them to protect the president at congress' request.

since then they have lost only *ONE* president, and it took a lunatic with a rifle a couple hundred yards away to do it.

why don't you email them to tell them how disappointed you are in their performance over the years.
 

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Phil said nothing about Obama's race, nor did he say that Obama is more important than anyone. You've misinterepreted the comments of an intelligent man to sound like drivel. Stop translating Phil's words into your unintelligible language.

then why did he capitalize *THIS* president genius, if it wasn't to single obama out for a reason?

since you are an expert reader, please tell me why he capitalized the word *THIS* president?

he clearly was stating somehow, for some reason, that THIS president is somehow different...so i think it merits an explanation...maybe you should look again at the word THIS being capitalized...according to your expertise in cognitive interpretation, a capitalized word in that regard is used for emphasis...so then you answer for Phil...why was THIS capitalized?

maybe you did not read closely enough, because the interpretation is quite clear to anyone who sees "THIS" president capitalized...unless they are a silly kid like you.

if phil is that intelligent, then why did he capitalize THIS, unless in his incredible intelligence he did not mean to suggest that Obama was somehow different unique or a special case other than previous presidents?

It is a perfectly fair explanation, and if Phil in his infinite wisdom is so smart, he can explain why he typed it that way and does not need a silly kid like you to try and defend him in your childlike and clumsy way since you didn't note the capitalization of *THIS*
 
Last edited:

Flashy

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Posts
7,901
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
183
Location
at home
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
^Do you enjoy putting words in people's mouths? Do you think people don't realize that you do it?

i think it is funny, how when i quote someone DIRECTLY it is called putting words in people's mouths.

you need to reread this thread.

or go back to school and learn to read again.

notguru said the secret service had "lost a few"...he was totally wrong.
Phil ayesho said they better protect THIS president, implying there was something more important about THIS president that needed to be protected.

No, but they've sure lost a few.

the Secret Service does not want to lose THIS one


don't blame me because you cannot read.

it is right there in plain english
 

marleyisalegend

Loved Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Posts
6,126
Media
1
Likes
611
Points
333
Age
38
Location
charlotte
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
It is a perfectly fair explanation, and if Phil in his infinite wisdom is so smart, he can explain why he typed it that way and does not need a silly kid like you to try and defend him in your childlike and clumsy way since you didn't note the capitalization of *THIS*

OMG Flashy called me childlike and clumsy? Damn, that's straight from the horses mouth. :frown1: