Not worried. I have no desire to be kicked in the ass or kissed by Willtom27.
Ah. Then apparently you haven't been paying attention. Because I would, and I have, accepted both. With all requisite appreciation.
Not worried. I have no desire to be kicked in the ass or kissed by Willtom27.
Ah. Then apparently you haven't been paying attention. Because I would, and I have, accepted both. With all requisite appreciation.
...
I would interpose the thought here that this (a common language) is not something to aimed for
Different languages result in different cognitive patterns; it has been posited, for example, that German pre-eminence in science and philosophy can be attributed to the synthesizing capabilities of that language
likewise, because of the emotive aspects of languages like Spanish and nipponese, one who was truly bi-lingual in, say English (an analytical language under the typology I was looking at) and either Spanish or nipponese, would have demonstrably greater scientific thinking capabilities, something that was never quite clear to me as to why, when I was reading those propositions
What??
Certainly German has (had) a 'tradition' as a (the?) 'scientific language', and I'm sure there's evidence that cognition and liguistic form/function are related, as I'm sure there's evidence they're not.
...
What??
Certainly German has (had) a 'tradition' as a (the?) 'scientific language', and I'm sure there's evidence that cognition and liguistic form/function are related, as I'm sure there's evidence they're not.
Still, truth be told I imagine there's something in the notion, even if it's primarily cultural as opposed to biological in origin or perhaps merely a side effect.
Also, Nipponese isn't a language in itself, it's a cultural reference. In any event, right or wrong, Boroditsky would love ya for the plug - at least it sounds like her line of thinking.:smile:
Two phrases I find important to know in the native language when traveling.
1) My hotel room is on fire.
2) Are those persons lepers?
You can't get by without these.
don't think it was [SIZE=-1][SIZE=+3][SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]Boroditsky it was recalling, but I'm actually impressed you knew her work
and, BTW, I do think language both enables and constrains conceptualization
As Tennyson would put it:
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]I sometimes hold it half a sin
To put in words the grief I feel;
For words, like Nature, half reveal
And half conceal the Soul within.
[SIZE=-1][SIZE=+3][SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=-1][SIZE=+3][SIZE=+1][SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]