A Woman's Size

[BobLeeSwagger]

[quote author=sammygirly link=board=relationships;num=1035048854;start=15#26 date=01/13/03 at 15:03:56]This is all mental, seriously.  Think about it this way, if a woman can get a human head OUT, she can get you IN.  The vagina is a very versatile thing.  Provide the right stimulation, get her wet enough and make sure she's ready and girth should not be an issue at all.
[/quote]

I'm not disagreeing with you because I don't have a vagina and I agree with how flexible they are and I love vaginas dearly. But whenever I hear the "if we can accommodate a baby's head" argument, they never mention that accommodating that baby's head seems to hurt an awful lot.

 

[13788]

sammygirly:

Very true but honey if your girth matches the size of a baby's head....?~blesses you~ i'm just so very sorry....Godspeed!

 

[13788]

emilywee: i would have to chime in and give my opinion that our sizes down there ARE different, and sure can be affected by sexual experience and cock size of previous bfs, but i do think we vary as much as men vary in length and girth. i "bottom out" at eight inches and could never do what some of you other women do without major cervix pain.

 

[13788]

Late_Bloomer: I think any big guy with experience with more than one woman can tell you that there are different sizes naturally in women regardless of experience. It's always an experiment the first few times with a new girl seeing how far it can go in before you get the "ah! it hurts!" and the clenching on the lower-stomach area. :-[

 

[13788]

H8Monga: I've talked to a couple of my women friends who happened to have had bigger, in a glimmer of hope for me, they say they'd never do it with a big guy again because it hurt so much. They vary in weight/height.
One of my friends told me he found that petite girls have more trouble than big girls... and one of the big girls I've met told me she had a 10" guy and she took it all even though it hurt. She said she wouldn't do that again but it did help make her a size queen... which I think is a pity.

 

[13788]

Late_Bloomer: It's the old too much of a good thing is no good thing at all. I've said it before, if I could trade this dick in for one with a few inches trimmed down in both dimensions, I'd probably be happier with it. I'd at least like to lose some of the unecessary thickness considering you can adjust how much you put in length-wise... :-[

 

[13788]

vikingstone: A quick two cents from me...I concur that body size or previous cock size has little to do with it. My ex-wife is 5' 10" 150 and seriously stacked...lovely round tits, small waist, nice big butt that you could just fu.....but I digress...She was extremely tight and also quite shallow. I had to be very careful about bottoming out in her especially in the deeper positions. She told me that her previous boyfriend was hung like a rhino and he dumped her because no matter what he did she ended up bleeding or screaming etc. Sounds like a gem, doesn't he? And she was taller than him...

 

[13788]

H8Monga: Yeah he sounded like a keeper and so sensitive. I feel sorry for the next girl he gets if she is like your ex-wife and has the same selfish attitude.

Latebloomer, care to explain why? I am terribly baffled. Who can adjust what? ???

 

[13788]

Late_Bloomer: Well, my dick is about 10 inches long and my girlfriend is probably only 7.5" deep inside, so I can pretty easily slam into her cervix if I'm not careful. However, after months of sex with her, I know her body quite well and can tell when I'm getting close to hitting her cervix so that I avoid doing so. So in essence I can "adjust" the length to fit her depth. Unfortunately thickness has nothing like this and it just takes a certain girl and a lot of work to be able to have sex without a lot of pain for her. I kind of lucked out with my current girlfriend because it only took a few weeks to get her used to my thickness and now she enjoys it, but I have actually had a girlfriend before who I literally could not have sex with because of the thickness... length will never cause that problem because regardless of how long you are, you can always just not put all of it in. Make sense? ???

It's one of the many curses I've found comes with this size. It is so unnecessary also, hence my dislike of it... my gf's previous boyfriend was also her biggest until me at a massive 5 inches long and quite thin... a little on the small side, so I figure a little on the large side as opposed to down on the huge end would probaby be ideal.

I guess you just have to deal with the cards nature dealt you though. :-X

 

[13788]

H8Monga: Massive 5 inches eh? Well...



Can nature deal the cards again?

Please?

 

[13788]

Savannah: I'm truly amazed at all the misconception in an otherwise extremely informative site. Women are built differently, and it has NO correlation to outside dimensions. There are tiny women who can squat and deliver a child and very large women who have C-sections because they cannot accommodate childbirth.

It has more to do with pelvic span and cervical dilation. Anatomically, the vagina is on average 4.5', but can stretch to much greater lengths. Whether or not the cervix is flexible (has a lot to do with hormone levels) can have a bearing on the acuteness of pain, as can a "high" or "low" cervix. Patience and lubrication would seem to be the keys.

Finally, it's lovely to be dismissed as a person by words like "fatty" and "lard". Tsk, tsk. Your preferences are your own, but your prejudices affect us all.

Savannah

 

[13788]

SensuousCancer: [quote author=NineInchCock_160IQ link=board=relationships;num=1035048854;start=0#10 date=10/26/02 at 23:59:51]the large majority of women I have been with have been thin, of the couple average-chubby girls I have been with and the one fatty...  none of them had any problem at all.  The biggest complainers for me have been skinny girls.  I think fat girls lube up better (maybe some of that is sweat dripping off their asses), and tend to have a healthier libido and get more excited about sex.[/quote]

I find it amazing that the hung men here can be up in arms about being wanted just for their dicks yet consider it ok to bash "fattys" and other traits they are not personally attracted to.

"I may have a huge dick but that's not all I am, I'm a human being with feelings and personality."

You can put down a woman as being undesirable because of her body type yet turn around and bemoan the fact that you may be wanted because of yours and belittle the women who desire a larger dick as being shallow "SIZE QUEENS".

As for "fatty" having a heathier libido, more excited about sex, and being more lubricated there is a scientific basis for that. Fat stores the sex related hormones and I have read of studies that overweight women have more of these hormones hence more desire. When I see a woman who is filled out, has hips and thighs and boobs and booty, she often just screams "SEX" in every way. A skinny woman without these traits is no more appealing than a sexless eunic.

That is my personal opinion, of course.

SC

 

[13788]

berkeleyerin: I'm on the small side, 5'4", 110lbs, and I never have too much trouble taking up to about 9". After that it's possible, but I need more "adjustment time" and horniness.