StaffnRod
Superior Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Posts
- 5,769
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 5,585
- Points
- 358
- Location
- Texas (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
As one who has perused the threads overtime, I tend to agree with your perceptions as I too have noticed a more recent focus on the Fem Orgs without looking close for the *HUNG* dudes aspect. The caveat enters with definition of the very subjective word *Hung*- which for some as you, limits to 'size queens' OR those who look to any combo of a sufficient size, motion & passionate techniques to bring on those ' actual-female-orgasms' , like all males may strive for achieving personally. This last thought follows my prior comments " Seems the (porn vid) studios have seen the bankable value of catching those orgasmic girly cums & squirts ", nearly as much as the stroking stud cock's required money shot. (of whatever size or girth)You know, I'm glad that you all have been enjoying the thread, but it has gone very far from it's intended subject matter. Actual female orgasm from *HUNG* dudes. I didn't mean HUNG in the general sense, I meant HUNG for pornstars. To me, the baseline size of these dicks should be, at minimum, the size of a Johnny Sins or Bruno Dickemz, and there are WAAAYYYYY too many guys in these videos who are barely even average for the porn world. I seem to remember seeing another thread that features female orgasm regardless of the co-star(s), most of these videos belong there or on a new thread simply titled "Real female orgasm." It has gotten to the point that so many videos are posted with average to below average men getting women off that I don't even feel like combing through them anymore to find the occasional type I am looking for, which are size queens getting off on truly hung co-stars. Initially, most of this thread's responders were posting videos that matched the intention of it's title, and though there were less vids posted overall, they were reliably appropriate. I am going for quality over quantity, please take all of your vid posts of under-endowed men who know how to get ladies off (regardless of the hope they give to those men who are similarly lacking in that region) to a new thread.
Just To preclude future critiques of any vid shares here, all centering on the subjective word *Hung*;
suggest that a baseline list for clarifying expectations for *Hung* cock size vs.those 'under-endowed men' - remembering factors that may include others than the proverbial BBC
> pure length (C. Stokes) could be offset by girth (J. Deen or C. Diamond)
>Current pro films distort sizes with fisheye lens, aspect ratios etc; especially in POV shots
>without that above, even P. North could look just a bit above the 6" avg, in many pre-1990 vids
>obviously those Amat. poorly lit, Lower quality clips w/o definitions will be of greater scrutiny
>given too tight of constraints like ''size queen" expectations could exclude many notables;
actors like M. Ferrara, C. Dera, T. Gunn, C.White+ + to name a few
Yet again, I do agree those less endowed like Tyler Nixon are way below par for this thread.
At any-rate, I followed suggestions & started the migration with a re-post of what may be
perceived as not qualifying here- yet Preston P, seems to provide plenty of cock for Maddy O.
Maddy's spanked reddened ass leads to orgasmic convulsions ~ 25.3' & 30.3'
http://www.veporn.net/video/work-is-long-when-youre-wearing-a-thong-maddy-oreilly-preston-parker ..'
Please advise with basics of that baseline list of bigger than avg. *Hung* dudes.
Last edited: