Advice to get ball's deep!

[RawDog]

In short, go slow until you know what's where, and never believe anyone who tells you, "it doesn't hurt, don't worry about it", unless it is the person you are having sex with at the time, in which case you can apply it to that person only.

Good philosophy.

You may put pressure on it through pressure on the posterior fornix wall but to say that one is stimulating the PoD is misleading. There's nothing to suggest that the PoD itself has anything to do with pleasurable sensations. We don't say, "some women really love having their bladder pounded", or, "I got up into her bladder", even though the bladder lies outside the anterior vaginal wall (as the PoD does the posterior) and through opposing pressure to the penis can enhance the pleasure from stimulating the AFE. It's not the PoD being stimulated any more than it is the bladder so I don't see why it should be mentioned as though it were an erogenous zone. It's erroneous.

So where would you say the pleasure is coming from when we do come in contact with that deep spot then? My wife's had a total hysterectomy, so there's not even a cervix there to be stimulated anymore. When we do get int the rhythm of grinding deep, there is a definite "sinewy" feeling rib that my cockhead feels like it's shifting front to back to front over.

I wish I could describe it better, but when we get that deep and rub for a few minutes, she has the most explosive orgasms. She says it's the deep spot combined with her clit on my pelvic bone being stimulated.

 

[Riven650]

Good philosophy.



So where would you say the pleasure is coming from when we do come in contact with that deep spot then? My wife's had a total hysterectomy, so there's not even a cervix there to be stimulated anymore. When we do get int the rhythm of grinding deep, there is a definite "sinewy" feeling rib that my cockhead feels like it's shifting front to back to front over.

I wish I could describe it better, but when we get that deep and rub for a few minutes, she has the most explosive orgasms. She says it's the deep spot combined with her clit on my pelvic bone being stimulated.

Scar tissue is a lot less elastic than 'normal' tissue, so that 'sinewy' patch you can feel might be the scar where her cervix once was.

The reason your wife enjoys you being buried deep might be that she's just enjoying the feeling of her vagina being stretched lengthwise. Also the being filled widthwise puts pressure on the 'legs' of the clit which are around the entrance to the vagina. And, as she says, combine all that with pressure on her clit from your pubic bone = dynamite combination. More power to you both!

 

[RawDog]

Scar tissue is a lot less elastic than 'normal' tissue, so that 'sinewy' patch you can feel might be the scar where her cervix once was.

Good theory, but I forgot to mention that "sinewy" patch was there before her hysterectomy too.

 

[Riven650]

Aah. I really don't know then. You're working your way in between her bowel and her bladder, and there's a lot of connective tissue in the area. Did she keep her ovaries? If so, they're very close by. Everything's packed full in there. A gynecologist might have an answer.

 

[redbear52]

My experience is that women vary greatly in the amount of cervical contact they can tolerate without feeling pain. And I know for a fact that the angle at which the cervix projects into the vaginal canal differs considerably from woman to woman. In some the cervix projects nearly end-on into the very end of the vaginal canal, in others it projects nearly horizontally into the anterior (front) portion of the vaginal canal, etc. The cervix also varies in size from one woman to another, and definitely varies in size and sensitivity in at least some women, during different phases of the menstrual cycle.

Women don't all match some standard anatomical diagram that depicts the "normal" or "most common" anatomical relationship.

In some women, the cervix moves out of the way pretty easily, and in others it does not. I agree that many women will tolerate sustained pressure on the cervix, or relatively gentle "nudging", but not forceful jabbing. But I have had a couple of lovers in whom I could box the cervix pretty forcefully with no objection or apparent discomfort on their parts.

 

[D_Sparroe Spongecaques]

I love doggie. It's my favourite position. But it's not a good position until you're comfortable with his size.

I'm like you in that the more aroused I am, the more I can take.

What ^^ said.

 

[Gillette]

So where would you say the pleasure is coming from when we do come in contact with that deep spot then? My wife's had a total hysterectomy, so there's not even a cervix there to be stimulated anymore. When we do get int the rhythm of grinding deep, there is a definite "sinewy" feeling rib that my cockhead feels like it's shifting front to back to front over.

I wish I could describe it better, but when we get that deep and rub for a few minutes, she has the most explosive orgasms. She says it's the deep spot combined with her clit on my pelvic bone being stimulated.

That sinewy rib may be where her Douglas pouch is. But just because you can feel that sinewy rib does not mean that it's the sinewy rib that is being stimulated. It's still the vaginal wall delivering the sensation to the brain. That there is resistance on the outside of that wall when your penis thrusts against the inside of the wall may heighten the sensation but the fact remains that it is vaginal stimulation.

I find it easier to cum on a full bladder. For similar reasons that a girthier cock presses more firmly against my vaginal walls, a fuller bladder helps to press my anterior vaginal wall more firmly against the cock. It's not the bladder being stimulated, it's presence and fullness just aids in the stimulation my vaginal wall receives.

Regarding length I think Riven is right about the stretch feeling good. The flesh of the vagina is elastic. I think when the vagina is stretched lengthwise that it narrows the canal in the process, much as a sock stretched out will narrow as it gets longer as opposed to only increasing in length accordion style. I think this narrowing of the canal when stretched lengthwise increases the pressure of the vaginal walls against the cock.

In any instance your cock is not stimulating her PoD nor is my bladder being stimulated by the man's penis. The PoD and the bladder are merely aiding, through resistance, the pressure the cock puts on the vaginal walls.

Assuming you outweigh your wife if you were to stand pressed up against her and leaned your weight into her, she'd only feel so much force before she'd be pushed out of the way. That's analogous to the pliancy of the vaginal walls in response to the rigidity of an erection. Do the same thing but with her braced against a wall on the opposite side from you. Now that she can't yield to the pressure she will experience more of it, to the point where you crush her or knock down the wall.

Here's the thing. It's not the wall registering or delivering the sensation of pressure.

Clear as mud?

 

[RawDog]

Interesting point I hadn't thought of before. Since I feel it from the penis' perspective, it's hard for me to discern what feels good for my wife, much less why it feels good.

It all boils down to:

1) Does it feel good: Yes

2) How do we make it feel good: Sinking it all the way in until it stops, push in a little further until it almost hurts, Rock back and forth

3) Why does it feel good: Either it's from the longitudinal push, the lateral stretch, or the gnashing on the back wall against something providing resistance (or all 3 combined), mixed with the clit being stimualted by the pelvic bone.

 

[RawDog]

I've been fixated more and more on your reply, Gillette. But more to the way your brain works. What's your take on the g-spot?

 

[Gillette]

I've been fixated more and more on your reply, Gillette. But more to the way your brain works. What's your take on the g-spot?

The question is pretty open so I'm not sure where to start for an answer.

Drifterwood posted a thread about this some time ago. I tend to agree with the information in the link.
http://www.lpsg.org/125066-the-female-prostate.html

 

[RawDog]

I hope you take this as a compliment, but they way you think reminds me of me sometimes. You look at things, gather information and come to some conclusions that are about 4 or 5 steps detached from popular notion. Then you go back and clearly define those 4 or 5 steps with irritating ease.

I say irritating in an "I'm fucking jealous" manner by the way. (EDIT: How do you say "I want to fuck your brains" without sounding really really creepy?)

But, back to the subject, I was just wondering if you had any thoughts on the g-spot that wasn't popularly accepted.

The question is pretty open so I'm not sure where to start for an answer.

Drifterwood posted a thread about this some time ago. I tend to agree with the information in the link.
http://www.lpsg.org/125066-the-female-prostate.html

 

[B_henry miller]

My question is I cant get balls deep in my wife, she is only small and i bump her cervix if I try to go all the way in!

I really want my balls slapping against her pussy.

I think this should be included in the standard marriage vows: "To have and to hold. In sickness and in health. Rick or poor. To have my balls slapping against her pussy."

 

[double_digit]

(EDIT: How do you say "I want to fuck your brains" without sounding really really creepy?)

"Come with me dear-heart, we'll explore our capacious abilities to satisfy ourselves beyond reason, together. And we shall not stop until we are void, senseless and inarticulate with passion."

I think I was born 200 years too late, I could write Victorian age Gothic smut/horror fiction stories.

 

[Gillette]

I hope you take this as a compliment, but they way you think reminds me of me sometimes. You look at things, gather information and come to some conclusions that are about 4 or 5 steps detached from popular notion. Then you go back and clearly define those 4 or 5 steps with irritating ease.

I say irritating in an "I'm fucking jealous" manner by the way. (EDIT: How do you say "I want to fuck your brains" without sounding really really creepy?)

But, back to the subject, I was just wondering if you had any thoughts on the g-spot that wasn't popularly accepted.

I thank you for the compliment. I had always assumed from the way that people often take issue with me over points I hadn't even made that my convoluted posts were incomprehensible.

Thoughts that aren't popularly accepted about the g-spot... that it exists seems controversial enough. Honestly I didn't have any specific unusual thoughts on it but after rereading Drifter's article it occurs to me that the full bladder business could come into play there as well. Note that the female prostate is wrapped around the urethra. Pressure on the bladder could force fluid down the tube putting pressure on the FP from the inside out, which in turn might make it that much more sensitive to pressure from the penis from inside the vagina.

My wild assed guess for the day.

Non creepy way to say you want to fuck my brains might be to say you want to make me feel like I've just watched Jacob's Ladder.

 

[RawDog]

Honestly I didn't have any specific unusual thoughts on it but after rereading Drifter's article it occurs to me that the full bladder business could come into play there as well. Note that the female prostate is wrapped around the urethra. Pressure on the bladder could force fluid down the tube putting pressure on the FP from the inside out, which in turn might make it that much more sensitive to pressure from the penis from inside the vagina.

Bingo! I knew I could count on that gray matter. My wife and I were talking about how my morning wood most of the time subsides to flaccid pretty quickly after I piss in the morning. I think the full bladdder theory can work both ends of the spectrum.

I asked my wife about your theory and she said it makes sense, but she hates having sex with a full bladder because it hurts that way.

Non creepy way to say you want to fuck my brains might be to say you want to make me feel like I've just watched Jacob's Ladder.

I like it!

 

[Gillette]

My wife and I were talking about how my morning wood most of the time subsides to flaccid pretty quickly after I piss in the morning. I think the full bladdder theory can work both ends of the spectrum.

I hadn't even considered that but it makes perfect sense. (I feel a thread coming on)

I asked my wife about your theory and she said it makes sense, but she hates having sex with a full bladder because it hurts that way.

If your positioning or girth puts a lot of pressure on her front wall, yeah, I can see that getting very sensitive to the point of discomfort quite quickly.

 

[RawDog]

I hadn't even considered that but it makes perfect sense. (I feel a thread coming on)

Beat you to it (by about 4 months):

http://www.lpsg.org/178650-morning-wood-and-the-first.html