Aesthetically: Cut Or Uncut? Vote!

Better looking?


  • Total voters
    436
D

deleted808122

Guest
I like both; just BIG

Yup. However....

Pound for pound, uncut gets my juices flowing more heavily. More toys to play with and there's the visual illusion of a longer shaft. If his foreskin is even the slightest bit loose, I love running my tongue all around underneath it. Sheath him back and you get that beautiful, soft, much more sensitive head.
 

uncutwonder v2.0

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Posts
81
Media
35
Likes
1,550
Points
193
Location
Boston (Massachusetts, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
As an uncut guy who’s with another uncut guy: on aesthetics only I prefer cut cocks. To use and play with I prefer uncut.

If I had to explain the aesthetic reasons it’s probably the sleekness and simplicity of a cut cock. Same goes with my preference for cars haha.
 

notsolittle

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Posts
753
Media
366
Likes
5,924
Points
598
Location
Scotland, United Kingdom
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I am un-cut, but my frenulum has detached from the head, so I can also look like I am cut if I pull the foreskin all the way back.
If I'm honest, I would prefer uncut, being a self-sucker, having a foreskin to play with is awesome!!
 

DiomedesXVI

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Posts
3,230
Media
112
Likes
27,392
Points
408
Location
Calgary (Alberta, Canada)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
As a circumcized guy I realize I am partial to what I'm used to seeing. I like the visual impact of the fully exposed glans more than all that extra skin.

That said, I have never played with an uncut guy. Looks like fun.
I am just going to dispel a common phrasing I see about foreskin here, so don't take it personally :)

The foreskin is not "extra skin", it is the amount you're born with and naturally have. Extra would be like having 6 toes, it's anomalous and doesn't occur outside of extremely rare congenital aberrations. Foreskin is something every male is born with, thus it cannot be "extra". There are indeed men who are naturally born without foreskin, but that is actually a congenital aberration haha, a condition called aposthia.

I just wish people would stop thinking the foreskin is some extra (and by virtue of extra, entirely unnecessary or unnatural) thing, it's not. Thanks for letting me speak up.