The reason there are different standards is because they aren't actually testing for the virus. They test for antibodies, which is a very common way of testing for diseases. Even though one guy on the video made it sound like this was unheard of, and some other idiot claimed that if you had antibodies then you were immune to whatever you body developed the antibodies for. Because they are testing for a reaction to the virus, and not the virus itself, there are different levels of certainty depending on the test. Some are more stringent than others. Just like if you get tested for pregnancy, one test might be positive and the next one negative... but that doesn't mean that you were pregnant one minute and not the next. That's absurd.
Yes but get tested in Africa and you have twice as much chance of being tested positive than in Australia, if the whole planet are working together for a cure, it seems strange that they haven't set one official standard.
As for facts not being exposed, here are a few examples that I came across:
911 WTC -
*free fall collapse of 3 towers into their footprint, no fire has ever made a skyscraper do this, let alone 3
*Officially unexplained pools of molten metal in the wreckage
*Bomb sniffing dogs withdrawn from the building days before 911
etc. etc.
The American Union -
Are you Americans/Canadians/Mexicans ready for the
Amero? How many of you have even heard of it?
I also find it difficult to believe that anyone would just watch youtube to get their information and accept it as truth. If you discover things like the examples I mentioned, your curiousity will make you find as many sources as possible to back up those facts.
Some theories sound too fantastic to be believed but there have been many accounts of people going to extremes to achieve control over the population in history so these theories (if there is evidence to back up the facts) shouldn't be dismissed without analysis.