Enid
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
- Posts
- 7,326
- Media
- 10
- Likes
- 17,472
- Points
- 393
- Age
- 53
- Location
- Arlington, Texas, US
- Sexuality
- Unsure
- Gender
- Female
- Enid,
Yes, it's her body... and she desires about an abortion.
But it still remains complicated because it includes two parties. No matter what. the reason are health issues and the moral question of "killing" an 8 month old baby
And this creates a problem...
The husband doesn't want a child, the woman refuse to do an abortion.
Why should he care for the child?
Why?
It's the woman's body.. if they have full control over it, shouldn't they carry the full burden of protection?
If I own a car and refuse to lock it up, it's me who has to pay the costs if it gets stolen...
That's what I think makes it complicated.
If you argue a woman has full control of her body and abortion is legal, you can't argue men have to carry 50% of the consequences.
Sure, it's logical that you can't force a woman to do, or not to do an abortion, but it doesn't has to mean man have to accept it without "compensation".
Child support is for the child. If a man has heterosexual sex, even with protection, he has to recognize that contraception does fail in some cases. Therefore, he is just as responsible for that child as the mother is, if she chooses to carry that child to term.